ReApeR

ReApeR — CS2 Stats

DE76561198071332252[U:1:111066524]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

580Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
703Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,250Blue band · top ~32.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 4 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,250 +1,513 4 Jun15 Sept · 32 days played
12,44414,999peak 14,9994 Jun15 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2026-06-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 749 below peak (14,999)
  • +1,121 over 30 days · improving
  • +334 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 750 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.8%43.8%44.9%meets
Shot accuracy2.7%12.0%12.4%9.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.021.040.09 short
Match win rate45.6%44.7%45.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGReApeRFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,250 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning59
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility6.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time570ms−93ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 15 Sept
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 10 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · ancient, 20 Aug
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 7 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 36anubisWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A36231364%-0.00
ancientC2181338%-0.02
anubisD1751229%0.00
mirageB105550%-0.01
cacheC73443%0.02
nuke42250%-0.02
inferno32167%0.01
vertigo110100%-0.02
debris1010%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,257Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
992Matches
45.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
44.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2.7%Shot accuracy
1,879MVPs
470Hours (in match)
1,187Bombs planted
223Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,679dust2
801vertigo
616nuke
536inferno
243train
44office
19lake
3ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

85Matches
59%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
69.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23462%0.9614.0
Ancient2277%1.0213.2
Anubis1429%1.1515.4
Mirage540%0.9110.8
Inferno450%0.5210.0
Vertigo250%1.3715.5
Train250%0.649.5
Nuke2100%0.478.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
70.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
560msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
60.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
15.03HE damage / grenade
13.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.8555% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6515% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.039%15 Sept
anubis13–40.1812%15 Sept
cache8–130.0712%14 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0310%10 Sept
dust213–90.0111%6 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0316%6 Sept
dust216–14-0.0617%29 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0113%28 Aug
dust213–20.0618%27 Aug
anubis10–13-0.084%25 Aug
anubis10–130.0220%25 Aug
dust213–110.008%24 Aug
dust213–110.0322%24 Aug
anubis17–19-0.0315%23 Aug
dust213–6-0.0123%23 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0324%23 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0515%22 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0017%20 Aug
dust27–13-0.0411%18 Aug
dust210–13-0.029%16 Aug
anubis11–130.0422%16 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0725%16 Aug
ancient13–80.0510%15 Aug
dust213–90.0114%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.007%14 Aug
ancient13–100.0417%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0125%13 Aug
dust213–70.0919%12 Aug
mirage16–130.0516%9 Aug
dust27–130.059%9 Aug
dust213–4-0.0613%9 Aug
ancient8–13-0.046%9 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0615%9 Aug
dust23–13-0.0122%2 Aug
dust25–13-0.0313%1 Aug
vertigo9–5-0.0223%1 Aug
cache10–13-0.0012%26 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0029%25 Jul
dust26–13-0.0419%25 Jul
inferno8–130.0121%23 Jul
dust213–9-0.019%23 Jul
anubis13–110.0214%22 Jul
cache8–13-0.0226%21 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0016%21 Jul
anubis13–40.048%20 Jul
dust213–8-0.008%20 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0735%20 Jul
dust213–50.0111%19 Jul
ancient10–130.0017%17 Jul
mirage13–80.059%17 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0316%16 Jul
cache13–90.0116%16 Jul
inferno13–50.0119%16 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0721%16 Jul
nuke7–130.0023%15 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0419%15 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0313%15 Jul
dust22–13-0.0412%14 Jul
dust213–70.0415%14 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0020%14 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0813%14 Jul
anubis9–13-0.055%14 Jul
anubis6–130.0816%13 Jul
cache13–30.1019%13 Jul
debris8–80.0831%13 Jul
dust213–10-0.0419%13 Jul
dust213–20.1222%13 Jul
dust213–3-0.069%13 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0017%10 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0116%10 Jul
cache6–13-0.0725%10 Jul
cache13–50.0936%10 Jul
nuke13–80.0116%10 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0112%9 Jul
ancient5–13-0.1010%9 Jul
dust212–12-0.0123%8 Jul
dust213–5-0.0221%6 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0318%2 Jul
anubis10–130.0414%1 Jul
ancient13–40.0519%1 Jul
ancient11–130.0114%1 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0619%1 Jul
ancient10–130.0014%1 Jul
dust214–16-0.0215%29 Jun
ancient16–120.0411%12 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0316%11 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0511%9 Jun
dust26–130.0018%9 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0016%8 Jun
dust213–7-0.0127%8 Jun
inferno13–90.0010%8 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0620%8 Jun
dust216–14-0.0313%7 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0118%7 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0213%7 Jun
dust213–9-0.0314%7 Jun
dust213–0-0.0210%7 Jun
dust213–160.0721%7 Jun
dust213–90.0016%4 Jun
dust213–5-0.0010%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →