ikke skyt

ikke skyt — CS2 Stats

76561198069558651[U:1:109292923]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,120Tracked matches42%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,141Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,980Top 50% of 211,308 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98799 of 258281 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,002 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (33 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,980 +21 2 Aug – 25 Sept · 14 days played
18,41419,999peak 19,9992 Aug25 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,002 +0 3 Sept – 10 Sept · 2 observations
1,0021,002peak 1,0023 Sept10 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,002Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,002
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 49 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,019 below peak (19,999)
  • -135 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,020 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate44.2%44.8%45.7%1.4% short
Shot accuracy1.4%12.4%12.7%11.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.031.050.17 short
Match win rate44.1%45.2%45.7%1.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGikke skytFACEITLevel 6 · 1,002 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,980 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,002csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning46
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–49–6Last 10045%Win rateLWLLLWLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · +33ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 668ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 662ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact2.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time642ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 691ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–2 · overpass, 5 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 4 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · inferno, 5 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 55% over 22mirageWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2212–1055%-0.02
mirageD175–1229%-0.03
nukeC166–1038%-0.02
infernoC156–940%-0.05
anubisB137–654%0.00
cacheC125–742%-0.04
rush_001—22–0100%-0.05
overpass—11–0100%0.15
eldorado—11–0100%-0.02
ancient—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,946Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
1,954Matches
44.1%Match win rate
44.2%Headshot %
1.4%Shot accuracy
3,104MVPs
680Hours (in match)
1,865Bombs planted
463Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,955
AWP1,805
Knife412
MP9395

Lifetime map wins

3,376dust2
2,371inferno
1,761nuke
401train
187bank
170vertigo
126lake
71safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

399Matches
48%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
62.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16248%0.8811.6
Dust27547%0.7911.9
Ancient4038%0.7711.7
Inferno3951%0.9113.2
Overpass3067%1.0814.2
Nuke2442%0.7313.6
Anubis2055%0.648.8
Train956%0.9616.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
91.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
662msReaction time
52.6%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
8.77HE damage / grenade
5.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4163 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0413%22 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0217%22 Oct →
mirage8–130.0224%19 Oct →
mirage4–130.0535%19 Oct →
dust27–130.0123%19 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0314%16 Oct →
inferno9–130.0023%14 Oct →
anubis12–120.0113%14 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0126%13 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0438%11 Oct →
cache13–80.0440%10 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0214%6 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0130%4 Oct →
rush_0018–4-0.1211%4 Oct →
rush_0018–60.0244%4 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0419%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.056%26 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0011%25 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0119%25 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0815%20 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0414%19 Sept →
cache7–13-0.068%17 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0025%17 Sept →
inferno13–90.0325%16 Sept →
dust213–40.0114%12 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0821%12 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0323%12 Sept →
mirage8–2-0.108%10 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0515%10 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0126%10 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0520%10 Sept →
inferno0–9-0.190%7 Sept →
anubis13–10.0417%7 Sept →
mirage13–110.0229%7 Sept →
mirage13–90.0828%6 Sept →
anubis2–130.1125%6 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0119%6 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0525%5 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0318%5 Sept →
overpass9–20.1519%5 Sept →
inferno9–6-0.0613%5 Sept →
eldorado9–7-0.0212%5 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1738%5 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0416%5 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0412%5 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0519%5 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0118%5 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0647%4 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0519%4 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.060%4 Sept →
nuke13–100.0014%3 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0013%3 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1917%3 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0523%3 Sept →
nuke7–130.0129%1 Sept →
inferno11–130.0318%1 Sept →
nuke13–70.0217%27 Aug →
inferno13–50.0830%27 Aug →
dust213–50.0518%27 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0940%27 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0340%24 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0214%23 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0423%22 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0414%22 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0323%20 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0110%19 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0524%19 Aug →
anubis12–120.0511%19 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0324%18 Aug →
dust216–14-0.028%18 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0416%16 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0226%16 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0519%16 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0840%15 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0113%15 Aug →
cache14–16-0.080%14 Aug →
anubis13–1-0.035%14 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0212%14 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0511%14 Aug →
mirage2–8-0.1114%12 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0214%12 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0319%11 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0010%11 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0319%10 Aug →
cache13–40.0123%10 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0129%10 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0317%10 Aug →
anubis13–20.0318%10 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0927%9 Aug →
nuke7–30.016%9 Aug →
dust213–7-0.039%9 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0721%7 Aug →
nuke12–120.0023%7 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0616%7 Aug →
mirage1–80.0117%7 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.039%2 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0415%2 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0613%2 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0936%2 Aug →
anubis12–20.0118%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.