Kvan-

Kvan- — CS2 Stats

76561198068688207[U:1:108422479]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,433Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,363Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,840Blue band · top ~39.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,605 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 6 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,840 -9,054 6 Apr16 Sept · 25 days played
12,68222,854peak 22,8546 Apr16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,605 +0 1 Sept9 Sept · 2 observations
1,6051,605peak 1,6051 Sept9 Sept
22,854Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,605Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-04-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,605
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 146 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 10,014 below peak (22,854)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,160 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches171+16
Win rate35%0%+35pp
K/D0.980.92+0.06
Headshot %38%42%−3pp

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate35.7%46.8%48.3%12.6% short
Shot accuracy10.1%13.0%13.2%3.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.061.070.08 short
Match win rate45.6%46.3%46.9%1.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKvan-FACEITLevel 8 · 1,605 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER12,840 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,605csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning50
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40564Last 10040%Win rateLLLWLWLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −72ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility3.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.0
Utility3.4
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time560ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 30 Apr
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 18 Apr
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 16 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 4 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD2261627%0.00
infernoB21101148%0.01
dust2D123925%-0.01
mirageD123925%0.00
ancientC125742%0.01
cacheS97278%0.04
anubisC73443%0.01
overpassA53260%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

97,834Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
5,586Matches
45.6%Match win rate
35.7%Headshot %
10.1%Shot accuracy
12,725MVPs
2,186Hours (in match)
3,311Bombs planted
1,150Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,770
AWP10,185
MAC-102,895
MP92,698
FAMAS2,280

Lifetime map wins

10,125inferno
9,106dust2
3,653vertigo
3,144nuke
834train
192cbble
154office
55safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

218Matches
57%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
100.1ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3060%1.1516.8
Inferno2374%1.5319.0
Ancient2040%1.0816.4
Anubis2065%1.4420.1
Vertigo1267%1.3617.9
Dust2944%1.3319.8
Overpass850%1.3619.4
Nuke743%0.7813.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
553msReaction time
46.3%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
6.67HE damage / grenade
2.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.0717 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–13-0.0119%16 Sept
dust23–13-0.0014%16 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0414%15 Sept
cache13–100.0017%15 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0018%14 Sept
inferno13–9-0.078%13 Sept
anubis9–130.0319%13 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0228%13 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0013%13 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0018%13 Sept
inferno11–130.0712%12 Sept
cache13–9-0.0410%12 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0313%12 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0126%11 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0218%11 Sept
nuke13–60.0112%11 Sept
dust24–13-0.0116%11 Sept
mirage1–130.0415%7 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0323%16 Aug
mirage10–130.0322%15 Aug
dust210–13-0.0016%7 Aug
inferno13–40.018%7 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0515%7 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0714%7 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0315%7 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0227%26 Jul
nuke6–130.0513%26 Jul
inferno16–140.1016%26 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0214%26 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0117%26 Jul
cache10–130.0214%26 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0410%19 Jul
cache13–110.0620%19 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0211%19 Jul
inferno6–13-0.029%19 Jul
ancient11–130.0125%19 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0523%19 Jul
inferno13–10-0.047%16 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0511%28 Jun
dust215–150.0014%28 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0419%28 Jun
nuke13–20.0514%28 Jun
cache13–110.0716%28 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0822%28 Jun
overpass13–4-0.0515%2 Jun
dust213–50.0118%1 Jun
nuke6–130.019%1 Jun
mirage13–110.059%1 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0615%1 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0417%20 May
nuke5–130.0517%20 May
overpass13–110.1212%10 May
inferno14–160.109%10 May
dust26–130.0518%10 May
ancient5–130.077%10 May
dust213–16-0.0415%9 May
cache13–80.0421%9 May
ancient13–160.0712%4 May
ancient13–10.0625%4 May
inferno16–130.0510%4 May
nuke16–140.0515%4 May
inferno13–100.0914%4 May
inferno2–13-0.1213%2 May
nuke13–9-0.015%2 May
cache13–70.0113%30 Apr
cache12–120.0022%30 Apr
cache13–30.177%30 Apr
ancient13–160.059%27 Apr
mirage11–13-0.046%26 Apr
mirage8–13-0.035%26 Apr
nuke9–130.0312%21 Apr
dust213–11-0.078%21 Apr
ancient5–13-0.039%21 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0124%20 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0218%19 Apr
ancient13–90.059%19 Apr
dust25–13-0.0522%18 Apr
nuke7–130.0518%18 Apr
overpass4–130.0113%18 Apr
dust25–130.0116%18 Apr
nuke13–80.1332%18 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0411%17 Apr
inferno15–150.0614%14 Apr
dust210–13-0.0318%14 Apr
nuke8–130.0419%14 Apr
inferno13–40.1320%13 Apr
mirage13–70.0916%13 Apr
inferno13–60.0816%13 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0116%12 Apr
anubis13–10.1017%12 Apr
mirage11–130.0110%12 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0611%12 Apr
anubis13–60.008%12 Apr
ancient13–90.008%12 Apr
mirage5–130.0216%12 Apr
inferno5–130.0224%12 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0616%12 Apr
overpass16–140.0620%11 Apr
dust216–13-0.0416%9 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0518%6 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →