Gwynedd

Gwynedd — CS2 Stats

US76561198064214067[U:1:103948339]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,226Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,219Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating27,716Top 5% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3114 of 251442 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (38 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 27,716 → 27,716
+2Tracked matches · now 4,226
+0.8ppWin rate · 60.7% → 61.5%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,716 +534 10 Mar – 6 Sept · 18 days played
26,18228,403peak 28,40310 Mar6 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,678 +0 2 Sept – 6 Sept · 2 observations
2,6782,678peak 2,6782 Sept6 Sept
28,403Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,678Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-03-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 687 below peak (28,403)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,284 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,304), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate59.2%50.9%
Shot accuracy18.0%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.111.09
Match win rate58.2%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGwyneddFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,716 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,678csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning53
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–32–8Last 10060%Win rateTTLWWLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 4–3–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 9–8–3 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility7.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.3
Utility7.5
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact8.8

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 18 Mar →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 18 Mar →
406msFastest reaction time · 1–10 · overpass, 20 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 27 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 88% over 8nukeWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2818–1064%0.02
overpassC167–944%0.02
mirageS1310–377%0.02
infernoB126–650%0.04
ancientA106–460%0.03
anubisS87–188%0.03
nukeC73–443%-0.00
cache—32–167%-0.04
italy—10–10%0.01
alpine—10–10%0.08
warden—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

238,575Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players
7,149Matches
58.2%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 10 players
59.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
18.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players
21,822MVPs
8,882Hours (in match)
7,230Bombs planted
2,091Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47122,033
AWP8,797
MP94,354
FAMAS4,015
P2502,870

Lifetime map wins

36,010dust2
11,638inferno
4,676nuke
4,209vertigo
1,215train
632office
53cbble
32italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

633Matches
60%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
81.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis7272%1.1415.9
Ancient5556%1.1115.1
Vertigo3379%1.2916.9
Nuke3250%1.2317.5
Mirage2952%1.0615.7
Dust21553%1.1617.3
Overpass1060%0.9312.7
Inferno450%0.9616.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
583msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
14.0%Flash assists
9.44HE damage / grenade
14.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2266% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–12-0.0314%1 Oct →
dust212–120.0122%1 Oct →
dust26–130.0740%5 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0226%8 May →
cache13–110.0427%8 May →
cache2–13-0.1313%8 May →
mirage16–130.0327%8 May →
overpass12–12-0.0020%23 Apr →
nuke13–40.1417%22 Apr →
mirage6–130.0312%22 Apr →
anubis13–70.0133%22 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.0213%22 Apr →
ancient13–50.0327%22 Apr →
inferno6–130.0516%22 Apr →
mirage13–4-0.0219%22 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0327%22 Apr →
dust213–90.0421%20 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0431%16 Apr →
dust21–8-0.0035%16 Apr →
overpass13–80.0225%14 Apr →
anubis13–100.0119%14 Apr →
inferno12–120.0613%14 Apr →
dust213–90.0126%13 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0231%12 Apr →
inferno13–80.1126%10 Apr →
mirage13–110.0524%8 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0721%8 Apr →
dust213–100.0729%2 Apr →
mirage16–120.0222%2 Apr →
overpass9–20.0019%2 Apr →
overpass16–140.0231%31 Mar →
italy9–130.0124%31 Mar →
anubis13–110.0125%30 Mar →
anubis13–80.0325%30 Mar →
anubis13–50.0530%28 Mar →
mirage13–80.0715%28 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0419%28 Mar →
overpass13–10.0727%27 Mar →
ancient13–80.0934%27 Mar →
dust213–10.1224%27 Mar →
ancient13–5-0.0118%26 Mar →
dust213–30.0111%26 Mar →
overpass14–160.0117%26 Mar →
alpine9–130.0832%26 Mar →
warden13–110.0140%26 Mar →
nuke11–130.0213%24 Mar →
dust213–90.0221%24 Mar →
dust211–130.0535%23 Mar →
overpass13–100.0622%23 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0030%23 Mar →
ancient13–90.0222%23 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0318%23 Mar →
dust213–60.0425%22 Mar →
dust213–50.0316%22 Mar →
dust213–8-0.0018%21 Mar →
mirage10–130.0523%21 Mar →
inferno13–90.1032%20 Mar →
overpass1–100.0221%20 Mar →
dust213–80.0121%20 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0323%20 Mar →
dust213–90.0731%18 Mar →
dust213–60.1830%18 Mar →
mirage13–30.0412%18 Mar →
nuke13–80.0028%18 Mar →
anubis13–60.1033%18 Mar →
inferno8–130.0129%18 Mar →
dust29–130.0345%18 Mar →
inferno6–130.0427%18 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0126%18 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0530%17 Mar →
overpass13–40.1126%17 Mar →
ancient13–70.0330%17 Mar →
inferno12–1-0.0217%17 Mar →
mirage13–40.0717%17 Mar →
dust213–40.0935%17 Mar →
mirage13–4-0.0031%17 Mar →
dust213–3-0.0022%17 Mar →
dust213–80.0124%17 Mar →
ancient10–130.0519%17 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0424%17 Mar →
inferno13–90.0120%16 Mar →
dust212–12-0.0419%16 Mar →
anubis12–120.0621%16 Mar →
overpass5–130.0316%16 Mar →
overpass12–120.0528%15 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0417%15 Mar →
dust213–70.0520%13 Mar →
inferno13–30.0723%13 Mar →
overpass13–90.0018%13 Mar →
dust213–90.0216%12 Mar →
overpass12–120.0531%12 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0117%12 Mar →
ancient9–130.0616%12 Mar →
nuke0–2-0.150%11 Mar →
ancient13–80.1121%11 Mar →
inferno11–130.0629%10 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0018%10 Mar →
mirage13–70.0210%10 Mar →
inferno7–20.0129%10 Mar →
nuke13–80.0426%9 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.