xbox — CS2 Stats

US76561198060806396[U:1:100540668]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,313Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,685Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	62.5%	49.0%	52.0%	above
Shot accuracy	13.5%	13.1%	13.7%	meets
Kill/death ratio	1.66	1.08	1.08	above
Match win rate	44.9%	46.9%	48.8%	3.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning61

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateLWLTWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression7.2

Utility4.6

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning6.1

Utility4.6

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time524ms−46ms

first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms

Headshot accuracy20.5%−2.7%

first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — train 13–0

13–0Biggest win — train

9Longest win streak

11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	30	20–10	67%	0.03
cache	C	28	12–16	43%	0.06
anubis	B	14	7–7	50%	0.03
ancient	S	11	8–3	73%	0.01
inferno	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.02
dust2	S	5	4–1	80%	0.07
train	—	3	1–2	33%	0.08
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

179,563Lifetime kills

1.66K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players

4,879Matches

44.9%Match win rate

62.5%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players

13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players

18,073MVPs

2,685Hours (in match)

4,696Bombs planted

1,918Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4798,041

M4A4 / M4A1-S20,725

AWP13,042

Desert Eagle9,284

P2000 / USP-S9,170

Glock-185,480

P2502,378

MP92,377

MAC-102,040

Knife1,731

Lifetime map wins

6,493dust2

5,889inferno

1,213nuke

962vertigo

717train

500cbble

110office

34dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

462Matches

52%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

82.7ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	88	49%	1.17	16.4
Ancient	57	65%	1.11	16.6
Anubis	35	51%	1.32	16.7
Inferno	32	44%	1.12	16.4
Dust2	13	62%	0.96	16.2
Vertigo	13	62%	1.21	15.6
Cache	10	70%	1.36	17.4
Overpass	9	44%	1.38	19.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.8%Spray accuracy

86.0%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

524msReaction time

36.8%T opening success

44.0%CT opening success

0.37Enemies flashed / flash

7.0%Flash assists

11.96HE damage / grenade

5.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3746 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.808% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
train	8–13	-0.00	11%	29 Aug →
train	13–0	0.20	32%	29 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.03	30%	27 Aug →
train	12–12	0.04	31%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	17%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	28%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.07	29%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.09	22%	25 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.07	23%	24 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.06	27%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.07	23%	24 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	25%	22 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.02	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.13	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.07	16%	20 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.15	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	8%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	26%	20 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.04	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.07	22%	19 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	15%	19 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.18	12%	19 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.06	30%	18 Aug →
nuke	3–9	-0.07	18%	18 Aug →
inferno	4–9	-0.07	14%	18 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.04	11%	18 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	9%	18 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.07	22%	18 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	11%	18 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.03	33%	18 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	15%	17 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	18%	16 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.02	27%	16 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	14%	16 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.00	17%	16 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.03	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.14	20%	16 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.01	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.16	25%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.11	19%	15 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.16	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	19%	15 Aug →
mirage	2–1	-0.05	14%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.15	30%	15 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.18	23%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.11	22%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	23%	14 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.08	16%	13 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.00	20%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.01	14%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	21%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	19%	8 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.03	20%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.13	25%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	21%	8 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.08	25%	8 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	10%	8 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.03	20%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.06	25%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.07	34%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	24%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	9%	6 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.07	22%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.00	18%	6 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.11	28%	4 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.00	38%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	31%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.01	12%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.05	21%	30 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.03	21%	30 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	20%	29 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	25%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.12	41%	26 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	26%	26 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.00	18%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.04	30%	25 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.12	33%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.06	33%	23 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.07	25%	20 Jul →
nuke	9–5	0.09	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.02	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–6	0.01	11%	18 Jul →
mirage	1–13	0.01	29%	18 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.14	26%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.06	24%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	17%	16 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.09	0%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.03	24%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.05	30%	12 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.13	19%	7 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.14	25%	6 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.02	17%	6 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	8%	4 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.11	21%	3 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	27%	3 Jul →