luca

luca — CS2 Stats

DE76561198060330858[U:1:100065130]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,701Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,964Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+11Tracked matches · now 1,701
−6.7ppWin rate · 60.0% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 11 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

35Days played since 2026-02-11

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,860), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate55.0%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy18.0%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.131.061.07above
Match win rate48.8%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlucaFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning66
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50491Last 10050%Win rateWLLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.3
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time589ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 4 Aug
47%Best headshot accuracy · 12–1 · nuke, 7 Jul
398msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 30 Jul
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 30 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 74% over 19anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2191243%0.00
infernoB20101050%0.01
cacheS1914574%0.02
anubisD113827%0.01
nukeS118373%0.01
ancientC83538%-0.02
mirage42250%-0.02
overpass3030%-0.02
vertigo21150%-0.00
shelter1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

187,799Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,585Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
55.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
18.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
24,690MVPs
3,507Hours (in match)
7,575Bombs planted
2,373Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4771,111
AWP9,784
P2502,410
MAC-102,333
Knife2,234

Lifetime map wins

16,567inferno
13,620dust2
3,524train
2,923cbble
2,793nuke
1,420assault
1,355vertigo
387aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,748Matches
52%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
80.2ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25536%1.0216.0
Inferno4156%1.2416.5
Cache4062%1.3316.3
Mirage3450%1.0516.4
Ancient3053%1.1117.9
Anubis2748%1.1217.0
Nuke1867%1.1016.9
Overpass10%1.3225.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
582msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
59.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
9.52HE damage / grenade
6.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5498% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0214%22 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0125%21 Sept
anubis9–130.0013%14 Sept
nuke13–100.0121%13 Sept
inferno9–130.0233%13 Sept
cache13–50.0630%13 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0512%13 Sept
inferno11–130.0430%13 Sept
anubis13–50.0123%13 Sept
anubis11–130.0430%11 Sept
ancient13–13-0.0416%5 Sept
dust22–13-0.0832%5 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0212%5 Sept
inferno13–110.0423%25 Aug
ancient5–13-0.1117%19 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0612%19 Aug
cache13–40.0921%19 Aug
nuke13–60.0322%19 Aug
dust213–100.0532%19 Aug
cache13–4-0.0213%18 Aug
cache13–10-0.0218%18 Aug
inferno13–60.0319%18 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0721%17 Aug
cache13–50.0729%17 Aug
cache13–110.0017%17 Aug
inferno13–40.0633%17 Aug
ancient9–130.0228%17 Aug
dust211–13-0.0428%17 Aug
dust213–110.0223%16 Aug
anubis23–250.0322%16 Aug
cache13–70.0327%16 Aug
cache13–90.0520%16 Aug
anubis19–170.0329%13 Aug
dust23–130.0338%12 Aug
nuke19–15-0.0120%11 Aug
inferno13–60.0020%10 Aug
inferno13–100.0024%10 Aug
dust24–130.0120%10 Aug
nuke13–70.0317%10 Aug
dust27–13-0.0111%10 Aug
cache13–30.0424%10 Aug
ancient13–100.1023%10 Aug
inferno8–130.0028%10 Aug
cache7–13-0.0020%8 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0827%8 Aug
cache8–13-0.0639%7 Aug
mirage8–130.0233%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0526%7 Aug
inferno4–130.0129%7 Aug
cache13–30.0032%4 Aug
dust213–110.1130%4 Aug
cache13–90.0127%4 Aug
dust211–130.0031%4 Aug
dust217–190.0329%4 Aug
dust27–130.0021%3 Aug
inferno16–140.0218%3 Aug
nuke9–130.0138%31 Jul
anubis16–140.0524%31 Jul
cache7–13-0.0126%30 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0819%30 Jul
cache13–50.0738%30 Jul
dust213–60.0437%30 Jul
inferno13–80.0221%30 Jul
inferno13–20.0332%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0525%26 Jul
dust216–12-0.0123%26 Jul
cache13–20.1125%26 Jul
dust213–110.0232%26 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0527%26 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0116%26 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0219%23 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0522%21 Jul
nuke13–100.0125%19 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0027%13 Jul
dust213–8-0.0331%13 Jul
dust213–6-0.0327%13 Jul
inferno17–190.0513%12 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0421%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0324%10 Jul
shelter12–12-0.0031%9 Jul
dust211–13-0.0130%9 Jul
cache10–13-0.0417%8 Jul
cache10–13-0.0720%7 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0122%7 Jul
nuke12–10.0747%7 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0017%7 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0524%12 May
nuke13–70.0532%12 May
overpass7–130.0322%12 May
anubis3–130.0430%12 May
dust213–100.0322%12 May
nuke4–13-0.0237%11 May
ancient7–20.0333%11 May
inferno6–130.0041%11 May
overpass2–13-0.0423%11 May
overpass7–13-0.0423%15 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0821%15 Apr
inferno9–7-0.0033%15 Apr
vertigo13–40.0110%11 Feb
vertigo7–13-0.0224%11 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →