Uchiha Madara on Vichy Catalán

Uchiha Madara on Vichy Catalán — CS2 Stats

76561198059733357[U:1:99467629]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,362Tracked matches68%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,657Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,118Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61708 of 230915 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,891 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,118 → 21,118
0Faceit ELO · 1,891 → 1,891
+6Tracked matches · now 1,362
0.0ppWin rate · 67.9% → 67.9%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 29 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,118 +1,119 29 Dec19 Sept · 17 days played
16,17121,118peak 21,11829 Dec19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,891 +0 4 Sept19 Sept · 2 observations
1,8911,891peak 1,8914 Sept19 Sept
21,118Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,891Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2025-12-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,891
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 110 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,118
  • +4,509 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,882 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate41.3%46.8%48.3%6.9% short
Shot accuracy11.7%13.0%13.2%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.091.061.07meets
Match win rate47.1%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGUchiha Madara on Vichy Ca…FACEITLevel 8 · 1,891 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,118 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,891csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning42
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61363Last 10061%Win rateWWWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +6.6pp headshot accuracy · +28ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 91 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.3
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.2
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time502ms−102ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+5.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 17 Aug
45%Best headshot accuracy · 10–0 · mirage, 18 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 18 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 11 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA32191359%0.01
dust2A2516964%-0.00
nukeA116555%-0.02
infernoS96367%-0.01
cacheS96367%-0.01
ancientA74357%0.04
anubisC52340%0.00
vertigo110100%0.00
overpass110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,275Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,866Matches
47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
41.3%Headshot %
11.7%Shot accuracy
9,022MVPs
1,657Hours (in match)
3,913Bombs planted
823Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,698
AWP11,168
P902,334
Negev1,933
P2501,831
SSG 081,489

Lifetime map wins

7,123dust2
3,990inferno
3,438nuke
1,046cbble
767vertigo
457train
160office
70lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

470Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
77.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8149%0.8713.9
Dust26548%0.9314.7
Anubis6560%1.4115.8
Inferno5650%1.0916.1
Ancient4151%0.9215.0
Nuke2948%1.0618.2
Vertigo1560%0.9014.1
Train540%0.8114.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
6.9°Preaim
503msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
5.51HE damage / grenade
4.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.1289% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–130.0121%18 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0021%18 Sept
mirage13–60.0135%18 Sept
vertigo13–100.0025%18 Sept
dust213–4-0.1017%18 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0020%18 Sept
cache13–2-0.0428%18 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0323%18 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0429%18 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0332%18 Sept
mirage9–00.1023%18 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0719%18 Sept
dust213–100.0214%18 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0328%18 Sept
dust210–13-0.0233%17 Sept
mirage8–130.0020%16 Sept
mirage15–15-0.029%15 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0114%15 Sept
dust213–6-0.0510%15 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0913%15 Sept
inferno13–70.0025%15 Sept
cache13–90.0317%14 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0223%14 Sept
dust29–13-0.0322%14 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0310%11 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0417%11 Sept
dust213–4-0.0519%11 Sept
dust22–130.0126%11 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0317%8 Sept
mirage13–100.0324%7 Sept
nuke13–90.0113%7 Sept
nuke16–14-0.0423%7 Sept
inferno13–60.0218%7 Sept
dust28–13-0.0323%7 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0718%7 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0321%6 Sept
dust213–110.0724%6 Sept
dust213–110.0023%5 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0925%5 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0413%5 Sept
mirage13–80.0516%5 Sept
dust213–30.1021%5 Sept
cache13–20.0621%5 Sept
inferno13–20.039%5 Sept
dust213–100.0242%4 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0114%4 Sept
cache16–14-0.0915%3 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0215%3 Sept
cache13–80.0311%3 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0417%3 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0011%3 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0718%3 Sept
mirage13–50.1019%3 Sept
mirage10–00.0445%18 Aug
dust213–11-0.0228%17 Aug
mirage13–30.0319%17 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0227%17 Aug
mirage13–70.1326%17 Aug
nuke13–90.0621%17 Aug
anubis9–13-0.056%16 Aug
dust211–130.0221%16 Aug
cache13–1-0.0133%16 Aug
dust213–60.0118%16 Aug
mirage13–50.0416%16 Aug
nuke11–13-0.049%16 Aug
cache4–13-0.0520%16 Aug
dust211–130.0215%13 Jul
cache10–130.0321%13 Jul
ancient13–110.0311%13 Jul
mirage13–90.0714%13 Jul
dust213–100.0119%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.0420%11 Jul
ancient13–00.1213%11 Jul
anubis11–130.0014%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0412%11 Jul
anubis16–140.0612%10 Apr
dust211–13-0.0313%10 Apr
mirage9–130.0722%10 Apr
ancient13–20.1315%10 Apr
inferno14–160.0219%10 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0412%10 Apr
dust213–8-0.0216%10 Apr
mirage13–20.0015%10 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0016%5 Apr
mirage7–130.0120%5 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0014%4 Apr
mirage4–130.0018%4 Apr
anubis13–100.1017%2 Apr
ancient11–130.0413%2 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0211%26 Mar
dust25–13-0.063%30 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0215%28 Jan
dust213–10.0235%23 Jan
dust212–16-0.0111%23 Jan
nuke12–50.0010%20 Jan
dust213–3-0.0110%20 Jan
mirage13–00.0216%20 Jan
overpass13–90.0523%20 Jan
dust216–130.0321%19 Jan
dust213–11-0.0116%29 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →