♿-Turkkis

♿-Turkkis — CS2 Stats

FI76561198058099332[U:1:97833604]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,291Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,870Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,447 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,291 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 57 days played since 6 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,467 +5,467 6 Dec5 Jul · 17 days played
15,00020,586peak 20,5866 Dec5 Jul
20,586Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,447Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2025-12-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,447
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 84 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate39.1%46.8%48.3%9.1% short
Shot accuracy12.3%13.0%13.2%0.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.061.070.16 short
Match win rate46.6%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♿-TurkkisFACEITLevel 8 · 1,447 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,447csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning42
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55396Last 10055%Win rateWLLWWLLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +76ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.3
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.2

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time575ms−89ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 12 Jun
41%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · inferno, 1 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · nuke, 18 Aug
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 3 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12nukeWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2315865%0.02
dust2B1991047%-0.02
ancientA138562%-0.02
infernoB137654%-0.03
cacheS128467%-0.00
nukeC114736%0.01
anubisA53260%-0.01
overpass41325%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,702Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
3,903Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
39.1%Headshot %
12.3%Shot accuracy
7,575MVPs
1,870Hours (in match)
5,631Bombs planted
887Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,022
P904,285
AWP3,127
P2501,695
MP71,639
MP91,571

Lifetime map wins

6,146inferno
4,069dust2
3,995nuke
1,231vertigo
733cbble
664train
105office
88bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

530Matches
52%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
68.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10555%0.9212.5
Dust25048%0.8914.2
Nuke4963%1.0714.4
Inferno4461%0.9313.1
Cache3644%0.8814.3
Ancient3060%0.9013.6
Overpass2259%0.9813.0
Anubis2148%0.9113.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
572msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
25.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
7.48HE damage / grenade
9.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4992 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.0027% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–8-0.0114%1 Sept
dust26–130.0016%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0320%29 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0019%28 Aug
anubis13–100.0321%27 Aug
cache8–130.0315%27 Aug
dust26–13-0.0411%27 Aug
ancient12–12-0.069%27 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0024%27 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0321%27 Aug
nuke13–70.0025%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0622%22 Aug
mirage13–50.0320%22 Aug
inferno16–140.0211%21 Aug
mirage11–130.0717%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0814%18 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0012%18 Aug
mirage10–130.0513%17 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0618%14 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0521%13 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0815%13 Aug
cache13–90.0320%13 Aug
inferno13–60.0115%7 Aug
cache6–13-0.066%3 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0113%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0615%1 Aug
inferno11–130.0241%1 Aug
mirage13–30.0722%1 Aug
cache13–9-0.058%31 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0324%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0117%30 Jul
mirage22–200.0115%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0212%21 Jul
ancient16–140.0113%15 Jul
nuke10–13-0.058%12 Jul
anubis4–13-0.109%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0413%7 Jul
nuke13–80.0216%5 Jul
overpass2–9-0.0213%5 Jul
nuke13–60.0416%4 Jul
cache10–13-0.0317%4 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0216%1 Jul
mirage13–7-0.043%27 Jun
nuke9–70.0715%12 Jun
mirage13–40.1311%12 Jun
dust213–6-0.0123%12 Jun
inferno13–30.0110%11 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0121%11 Jun
cache13–7-0.0220%11 Jun
dust213–50.0225%8 Jun
ancient13–5-0.1012%4 Jun
overpass4–130.0523%3 Jun
ancient13–100.0717%3 Jun
overpass6–10.0611%3 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0514%2 Jun
inferno14–16-0.039%2 Jun
mirage13–70.0224%30 May
ancient16–140.0013%30 May
mirage13–50.0326%30 May
dust28–13-0.114%30 May
anubis13–8-0.0121%22 May
inferno7–13-0.0017%22 May
inferno13–4-0.0515%22 May
ancient13–6-0.0019%17 May
dust213–10-0.0118%17 May
ancient13–16-0.0116%16 May
dust28–130.0421%16 May
cache16–14-0.0216%14 May
mirage11–130.1019%12 May
dust216–140.0217%10 May
dust29–130.0416%10 May
ancient13–7-0.0321%9 May
dust29–13-0.0325%9 May
dust213–16-0.0720%5 May
dust213–2-0.0315%3 May
cache16–140.0115%3 May
cache13–100.0517%3 May
cache13–6-0.0226%3 May
cache13–7-0.0117%3 May
cache12–120.0418%29 Apr
dust213–8-0.0414%28 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0115%26 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0714%26 Apr
ancient15–150.0521%21 Mar
anubis13–60.0510%4 Mar
mirage15–150.0313%6 Jan
dust27–130.0426%29 Dec
nuke15–150.0115%21 Dec
dust213–4-0.0415%19 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0321%15 Dec
dust211–130.0227%13 Dec
dust25–13-0.0718%13 Dec
inferno13–9-0.0518%12 Dec
dust213–4-0.0815%11 Dec
mirage13–30.099%10 Dec
nuke6–130.0417%9 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0318%9 Dec
dust213–90.0118%8 Dec
overpass10–130.0115%6 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0212%6 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →