Ryu7 海王

Ryu7 海王 — CS2 Stats

76561198057501483[U:1:97235755]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,528Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,367Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,546 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Aug 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,546 → 1,546
+21Tracked matches · now 4,528
−10.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 30 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,464 -2,535 31 Mar6 Jul · 6 days played
21,94524,999peak 24,99931 Mar6 Jul
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,546Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-03-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,546
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 205 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches124+8
Win rate67%75%−8pp
K/D0.961.19−0.23
Headshot %55%49%+6pp

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.4%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy13.3%13.0%13.2%meets
Kill/death ratio0.951.061.070.13 short
Match win rate44.2%46.3%46.9%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRyu7 海王FACEITLevel 8 · 1,546 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,546csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning54
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateLLWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · −109ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility7.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.4
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time654ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 686ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 4–1 · dust2, 26 May
44%Best headshot accuracy · 4–1 · dust2, 26 May
500msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 14 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 30 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 23ancientWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28181064%-0.02
dust2S2316770%0.01
infernoC1971237%-0.02
ancientC145936%-0.03
cacheC83538%-0.02
anubis42250%-0.01
nuke330100%-0.00
overpass1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

187,084Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
8,032Matches
44.2%Match win rate
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
19,339MVPs
5,912Hours (in match)
10,760Bombs planted
2,432Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4770,915
AWP11,895
Knife4,939
MAC-103,615
MP93,107

Lifetime map wins

16,997inferno
11,471dust2
3,405nuke
2,638vertigo
1,382train
312cbble
32lake
19stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,606Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
76.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage48352%1.0615.9
Ancient25147%0.9815.4
Inferno19048%1.0015.4
Anubis18249%1.0415.0
Dust216152%1.0615.9
Nuke10650%1.0315.1
Vertigo6138%1.0415.6
Overpass2138%0.8814.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
651msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
10.50HE damage / grenade
12.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6856% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0621%14 Sept
mirage17–19-0.0423%12 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0621%12 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0512%12 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0522%11 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0217%5 Sept
anubis9–13-0.019%28 Aug
dust213–90.0629%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.017%24 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0415%24 Aug
dust216–14-0.0524%21 Aug
mirage19–16-0.0315%19 Aug
dust25–130.0136%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0513%16 Aug
dust29–13-0.0217%16 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0119%15 Aug
dust213–7-0.0230%11 Aug
inferno9–130.0026%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.0222%4 Aug
mirage16–140.0125%1 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0520%1 Aug
cache11–13-0.0222%1 Aug
inferno13–00.0212%30 Jul
dust213–9-0.0517%27 Jul
dust213–90.0427%27 Jul
cache4–13-0.0221%27 Jul
inferno9–130.0027%27 Jul
mirage13–90.0419%26 Jul
inferno14–160.0517%24 Jul
mirage13–60.0621%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0719%21 Jul
dust213–110.0111%21 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0521%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0116%16 Jul
cache13–90.0321%15 Jul
ancient13–100.0020%14 Jul
mirage19–16-0.0021%14 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0515%11 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0017%8 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0526%8 Jul
ancient13–70.0321%8 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0316%6 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0829%6 Jul
mirage5–130.0134%6 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0118%6 Jul
anubis13–110.0017%4 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0226%4 Jul
dust213–90.0315%4 Jul
mirage13–60.0217%4 Jul
ancient13–110.0113%4 Jul
inferno13–70.0422%4 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0121%4 Jul
dust213–100.0328%3 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0519%3 Jul
dust213–90.0333%3 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0615%3 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0810%3 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0616%26 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0921%26 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0324%26 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0322%26 Jun
ancient9–13-0.054%1 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0333%1 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0424%26 May
dust213–11-0.0127%26 May
dust24–10.1244%26 May
mirage13–9-0.0418%25 May
dust213–90.0625%25 May
ancient11–13-0.0126%25 May
dust211–13-0.0224%25 May
inferno10–13-0.0431%18 May
mirage9–130.0228%18 May
cache13–80.0320%4 May
cache8–13-0.063%4 May
cache1–13-0.077%4 May
cache13–9-0.0222%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0428%30 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0215%25 Apr
inferno13–160.0525%25 Apr
nuke13–60.0134%20 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0413%20 Apr
nuke13–100.0117%13 Apr
dust22–130.0229%11 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0411%11 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0515%10 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0324%9 Apr
inferno13–4-0.009%9 Apr
ancient8–130.0123%8 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0421%7 Apr
inferno4–13-0.029%7 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0427%4 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0524%4 Apr
mirage13–80.0329%4 Apr
dust213–7-0.0526%4 Apr
dust213–100.0413%4 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0414%4 Apr
dust216–130.0516%31 Mar
dust28–13-0.0030%30 Mar
anubis13–80.0336%30 Mar
dust213–100.0223%30 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →