aciddlew

aciddlew — CS2 Stats

76561198057082191[U:1:96816463]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,622Tracked matches75%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,565Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,202Top 50% of 211,308 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53403 of 258286 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,248 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,202 +1,430 6 Sept – 23 Oct · 24 days played
20,43423,486peak 23,4866 Sept23 Oct
23,486Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,248Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,248
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 103 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,284 below peak (23,486)
  • -948 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,798 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate37.2%44.8%45.7%8.5% short
Shot accuracy14.3%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.071.031.05above
Match win rate43.9%45.2%45.7%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaciddlewFACEITLevel 6 · 1,248 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,202 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,248csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning51
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–38–7Last 10055%Win rateWWWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +5.4pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Last 20

  • 14–5–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time559ms+39ms
first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 1 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 6 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 6 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 27infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2717–1063%0.00
mirageA2212–1055%0.01
cacheA138–562%0.00
ancientA116–555%-0.00
nukeC94–544%0.00
anubisA85–363%-0.01
infernoD51–420%-0.04
vertigo—42–250%0.04
overpass—10–10%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

115,374Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
6,498Matches
43.9%Match win rate
37.2%Headshot %
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
13,227MVPs
2,452Hours (in match)
4,221Bombs planted
1,328Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,079
AWP22,592
Knife4,294
P2502,982
MP72,165
P902,077

Lifetime map wins

15,648dust2
8,453office
3,799inferno
3,295nuke
3,146vertigo
789train
418cbble
191dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

358Matches
51%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
70.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
4%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3956%1.0814.6
Vertigo2846%0.8112.3
Dust22861%1.0414.6
Anubis2167%0.8413.1
Ancient1759%1.1014.8
Inferno1275%1.1414.3
Overpass933%0.9013.2
Nuke450%1.1618.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
551msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
6.76HE damage / grenade
10.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3465% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–50.1015%24 Oct →
ancient13–70.0624%24 Oct →
mirage13–50.0815%24 Oct →
vertigo10–13-0.0222%24 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0926%24 Oct →
dust213–60.0323%24 Oct →
cache13–0-0.0129%24 Oct →
dust213–50.0514%24 Oct →
dust213–10.0315%24 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0425%24 Oct →
mirage13–90.1110%23 Oct →
mirage13–90.088%23 Oct →
mirage13–40.0821%23 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0115%23 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.104%23 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0116%23 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0322%20 Oct →
inferno7–5-0.0638%20 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.086%17 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0312%17 Oct →
anubis13–100.0119%11 Oct →
nuke15–150.0122%11 Oct →
dust211–13-0.096%11 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0215%11 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0420%11 Oct →
cache13–90.0421%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0324%10 Oct →
anubis16–140.029%10 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0310%10 Oct →
mirage13–70.0311%10 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.004%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0121%10 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0119%9 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0122%9 Oct →
cache13–80.0114%9 Oct →
dust213–90.0320%9 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0529%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0315%9 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0013%9 Oct →
overpass7–130.1018%7 Oct →
inferno15–150.0123%6 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0014%4 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0014%4 Oct →
dust26–130.0123%4 Oct →
cache13–70.1115%4 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0413%4 Oct →
cache9–130.0313%3 Oct →
dust23–130.0116%3 Oct →
cache13–60.028%3 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0019%3 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0121%2 Oct →
mirage13–80.0511%2 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0329%2 Oct →
dust212–120.0119%2 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0326%2 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0220%2 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0712%2 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0126%1 Oct →
dust213–110.1314%1 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.037%26 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0026%26 Sept →
vertigo10–130.0725%26 Sept →
nuke11–130.029%26 Sept →
anubis15–150.0413%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0117%26 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0116%22 Sept →
dust213–100.0523%21 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0015%20 Sept →
dust213–80.0120%20 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0224%18 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0321%18 Sept →
ancient14–160.045%18 Sept →
nuke14–160.1021%18 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0918%18 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.017%18 Sept →
dust213–60.0029%17 Sept →
dust213–40.0424%17 Sept →
dust213–10-0.048%17 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0218%14 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0612%12 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.083%12 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.069%12 Sept →
dust210–130.006%12 Sept →
mirage13–110.1010%12 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.043%11 Sept →
dust213–80.0021%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.0613%9 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0213%8 Sept →
cache10–130.0011%8 Sept →
ancient13–60.0316%8 Sept →
mirage7–130.0113%8 Sept →
mirage11–130.0014%6 Sept →
dust21–13-0.1113%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0510%6 Sept →
mirage13–90.003%6 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0423%6 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.045%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0210%6 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0519%6 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0850%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.