agiks18

agiks18 — CS2 Stats

LV76561198339752724[U:1:379486996]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,435Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,929Top 50% of 211,308 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#99421 of 258293 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,836 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,929 +3,930 15 Sept – 17 Oct · 17 days played
14,99918,929peak 18,92915 Sept17 Oct
18,929Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,836Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
16Days played since 2026-09-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,836
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 165 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,929
  • +3,930 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,071 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGagiks18FACEITLevel 6 · 1,836 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,929 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,836csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning63
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–40–7Last 10053%Win rateWWWWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +5.7pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time563ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%−5.5%
first ⅓ avg 29.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 4 Oct →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 17 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 18 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2512–1348%0.04
dust2A2414–1058%0.03
cacheA148–657%0.02
anubisB137–654%0.02
ancientS96–367%0.01
nukeB84–450%0.05
infernoD51–420%0.04
vertigo—21–150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,850Matches
50%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
80.5ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage30951%1.2816.8
Ancient17346%1.2516.8
Dust216048%1.2717.4
Anubis16044%1.2817.6
Inferno10754%1.2117.3
Vertigo8357%1.3816.6
Nuke4353%1.2917.9
Overpass3941%1.3417.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
568msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
61.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
5.18HE damage / grenade
20.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6669% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0123%17 Oct →
dust216–120.0131%17 Oct →
mirage13–90.0160%17 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0217%17 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0320%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0833%16 Oct →
cache5–130.0130%16 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0016%16 Oct →
mirage13–90.0428%16 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0125%16 Oct →
dust213–50.0536%16 Oct →
anubis13–100.0234%11 Oct →
nuke15–150.0620%11 Oct →
dust211–130.0415%11 Oct →
ancient13–100.0119%11 Oct →
ancient10–130.0011%11 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0530%11 Oct →
mirage8–130.0113%11 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0311%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0536%10 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0115%10 Oct →
ancient13–90.0524%10 Oct →
mirage13–70.0327%10 Oct →
anubis13–70.0220%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0128%10 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0124%9 Oct →
anubis5–130.0114%9 Oct →
dust213–160.0622%9 Oct →
cache13–80.0125%9 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0428%9 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0115%9 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0026%9 Oct →
mirage13–160.0524%9 Oct →
inferno15–150.0826%6 Oct →
cache16–13-0.0126%4 Oct →
mirage13–70.0434%4 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0224%4 Oct →
cache13–90.0331%4 Oct →
mirage13–50.1531%4 Oct →
nuke13–40.1244%4 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0318%4 Oct →
anubis13–50.0516%4 Oct →
mirage2–130.0514%4 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0224%4 Oct →
cache15–150.0331%4 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0214%4 Oct →
cache13–70.0131%4 Oct →
nuke11–130.1324%4 Oct →
dust213–30.1328%3 Oct →
dust216–120.0140%3 Oct →
mirage12–120.0932%3 Oct →
cache9–130.0832%3 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0436%3 Oct →
cache13–60.0118%3 Oct →
nuke13–70.0734%3 Oct →
anubis11–130.0238%3 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0132%2 Oct →
mirage13–80.0238%2 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0331%2 Oct →
dust212–120.0229%2 Oct →
inferno6–130.0126%2 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0121%2 Oct →
cache5–130.0226%2 Oct →
inferno13–100.1228%26 Sept →
mirage15–150.0419%26 Sept →
ancient13–100.0533%26 Sept →
mirage8–130.0629%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0429%26 Sept →
anubis3–50.0023%26 Sept →
dust22–13-0.1115%26 Sept →
vertigo10–130.0221%26 Sept →
nuke11–130.0527%26 Sept →
anubis15–150.0624%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0138%26 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0333%25 Sept →
ancient14–160.0223%25 Sept →
nuke16–130.0447%25 Sept →
mirage13–50.0636%25 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0125%25 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0148%24 Sept →
mirage6–130.0438%24 Sept →
cache11–130.0717%23 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0233%23 Sept →
dust213–70.1328%23 Sept →
dust28–130.0424%22 Sept →
anubis13–40.1137%18 Sept →
dust216–130.0420%18 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0135%18 Sept →
dust213–110.0423%18 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0436%18 Sept →
cache13–40.1218%18 Sept →
mirage4–130.0726%18 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0128%18 Sept →
anubis11–130.0126%18 Sept →
mirage13–50.1035%18 Sept →
dust213–50.1432%18 Sept →
mirage8–130.0336%18 Sept →
dust213–90.0945%18 Sept →
mirage16–120.1228%18 Sept →
dust213–50.0929%15 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.