Amhplify

Amhplify — CS2 Stats

FI76561198057078261[U:1:96812533]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,622Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,990Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,563Top 25% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#49816 of 261490 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Nov 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,563 +3,061 30 Jul – 5 Nov · 18 days played
18,99022,563peak 22,56330 Jul5 Nov
22,563Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-07-15

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,563
  • +1,565 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,573 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,437 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate38.7%45.7%46.8%8.1% short
Shot accuracy20.7%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.281.051.06above
Match win rate38.2%45.7%46.3%8.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAmhplifyFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,563 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning72
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateWLLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility7.2
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 76% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 76% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning7.2
Utility7.2
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels7.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time542ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy12.8%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 12.0% → last ⅓ avg 12.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 6 Aug →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 7–2 · ancient, 30 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–2 · ancient, 15 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 1 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisD217–1433%0.01
infernoS1812–667%0.03
nukeB157–847%0.02
ancientA149–564%0.01
cacheA148–657%0.02
mirageC104–640%0.03
dust2A53–260%0.02
vertigo—32–167%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

162,445Lifetime kills
1.28K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
8,530Matches
38.2%Match win rate
38.7%Headshot %
20.7%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 7 players
15,546MVPs
4,358Hours (in match)
8,844Bombs planted
2,055Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,811inferno
3,923dust2
2,494cbble
2,005train
1,074nuke
933vertigo
490lake
213safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

408Matches
52%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
83.1ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2442%1.0815.9
Ancient2143%1.0415.6
Inferno1958%1.3416.1
Vertigo1443%0.9715.9
Nuke1040%1.2315.8
Mirage617%1.1019.3
Overpass580%1.0618.2
Cache333%0.7912.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
71.8%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
545msReaction time
76.5%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
12.7%Flash assists
8.75HE damage / grenade
11.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2682° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.8945% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.039%12 Nov →
nuke10–130.0420%12 Nov →
anubis9–13-0.0319%12 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.057%5 Nov →
inferno16–19-0.0312%5 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.037%5 Nov →
vertigo16–13-0.0017%5 Nov →
nuke13–60.037%27 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0313%27 Oct →
vertigo14–160.0111%27 Oct →
inferno13–20.1215%27 Oct →
nuke13–90.0812%27 Oct →
mirage14–160.0413%24 Oct →
anubis13–50.0429%24 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0522%24 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0310%24 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0118%24 Oct →
anubis8–130.0114%24 Oct →
dust213–60.085%21 Oct →
nuke16–130.0314%21 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.018%21 Oct →
ancient13–100.0210%21 Oct →
cache13–40.0112%21 Oct →
ancient8–20.0413%15 Oct →
cache13–50.0322%15 Oct →
mirage7–130.026%15 Oct →
anubis10–130.069%15 Oct →
inferno13–100.0616%13 Oct →
anubis13–20.1211%13 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.017%13 Oct →
ancient13–40.0313%13 Oct →
inferno13–40.0310%11 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0414%11 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.029%11 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0314%28 Sept →
anubis13–70.0411%28 Sept →
ancient5–130.0514%28 Sept →
cache13–110.029%27 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.043%27 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0610%27 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.018%17 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0213%17 Sept →
cache16–130.0518%17 Sept →
mirage9–130.0812%17 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.048%15 Sept →
nuke9–130.0213%15 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0512%15 Sept →
cache10–130.0112%9 Sept →
mirage13–100.0613%9 Sept →
inferno16–120.1318%3 Sept →
anubis11–130.0316%3 Sept →
anubis7–1-0.025%3 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.026%1 Sept →
anubis13–30.088%1 Sept →
ancient13–10.1017%1 Sept →
nuke13–110.0215%26 Aug →
nuke13–160.0012%25 Aug →
nuke2–130.0015%25 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.065%25 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.067%23 Aug →
cache8–130.0111%21 Aug →
mirage13–70.0210%16 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0110%16 Aug →
inferno10–130.0123%16 Aug →
anubis13–110.035%12 Aug →
ancient13–50.0414%12 Aug →
dust216–130.0516%12 Aug →
mirage13–70.0418%11 Aug →
anubis11–130.0413%11 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0214%11 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0112%10 Aug →
cache13–3-0.046%10 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0513%10 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0110%10 Aug →
cache13–110.0219%6 Aug →
nuke13–20.1711%6 Aug →
inferno13–70.1311%6 Aug →
cache8–13-0.057%6 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0111%6 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0115%6 Aug →
anubis9–130.1216%6 Aug →
inferno13–100.058%30 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.038%30 Jul →
cache13–50.1114%30 Jul →
ancient7–20.0231%30 Jul →
dust27–13-0.025%27 Jul →
cache13–40.179%25 Jul →
dust213–30.0211%25 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0811%25 Jul →
inferno13–100.048%25 Jul →
anubis8–130.0210%21 Jul →
mirage16–130.064%21 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0114%21 Jul →
inferno13–40.0911%21 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0313%19 Jul →
inferno8–130.037%19 Jul →
ancient13–30.0322%15 Jul →
nuke9–130.0013%15 Jul →
inferno16–140.0311%15 Jul →
cache14–160.036%15 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.