skznt

skznt — CS2 Stats

AQ76561198056864998[U:1:96599270]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,623Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,891Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,451Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90088 of 251268 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,248 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Jul 2026 (102 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,451 +3,447 1 May – 2 Jul · 20 days played
15,65919,767peak 19,7671 May2 Jul
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,248Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-01-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,248
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 103 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 316 below peak (19,767)
  • +1,742 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 549 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate43.6%43.7%44.8%1.2% short
Shot accuracy14.3%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.021.03above
Match win rate45.8%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGskzntFACEITLevel 5 · 1,248 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,451 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,248csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning59
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateLWWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time619ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy25.4%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 16–14 · inferno, 9 May →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 28 May →
461msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · mirage, 16 May →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 29 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
13–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 88% over 8ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2311–1248%0.00
mirageS2315–865%0.01
nukeC145–936%-0.00
overpassS107–370%0.01
ancientD92–722%-0.01
anubisC94–544%0.00
infernoS87–188%0.03
cache—43–175%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,184Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
4,376Matches
45.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
43.6%Headshot %
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9,695MVPs
1,891Hours (in match)
3,284Bombs planted
1,038Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

10,073dust2
5,933inferno
3,498vertigo
2,673nuke
1,198train
398cbble
83office
59assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

276Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
75.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2157%0.9414.7
Dust21050%1.2819.4
Vertigo771%1.2917.1
Ancient560%1.0016.2
Inferno560%1.1114.4
Nuke540%0.7311.0
Overpass475%1.1816.8
Anubis333%0.9313.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
615msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
10.76HE damage / grenade
5.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2497% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.0526%2 Jul →
mirage9–0-0.0425%22 Jun →
inferno13–30.0117%22 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0421%22 Jun →
overpass11–130.0519%18 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0430%18 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0435%8 Jun →
overpass13–7-0.0229%8 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0425%8 Jun →
dust216–130.0428%7 Jun →
nuke11–130.0720%7 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0336%7 Jun →
dust213–70.0112%7 Jun →
mirage13–50.0327%7 Jun →
nuke11–130.0023%6 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0121%6 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0224%6 Jun →
anubis13–16-0.0224%6 Jun →
inferno13–100.0836%6 Jun →
inferno13–40.0329%6 Jun →
mirage11–130.0332%6 Jun →
ancient13–110.0212%6 Jun →
cache13–160.0718%6 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0917%4 Jun →
dust213–30.0632%4 Jun →
mirage13–20.0832%29 May →
nuke6–13-0.0030%29 May →
dust210–13-0.0125%29 May →
overpass15–150.0331%29 May →
dust213–8-0.0418%29 May →
overpass13–100.0532%29 May →
dust213–10.0724%29 May →
ancient11–130.0432%29 May →
nuke15–150.0923%28 May →
dust213–90.0247%28 May →
anubis10–13-0.0522%28 May →
dust213–110.0323%28 May →
mirage13–110.0623%28 May →
ancient15–15-0.0118%26 May →
mirage13–6-0.0312%26 May →
anubis9–130.0416%24 May →
nuke11–130.0527%22 May →
dust217–190.0118%19 May →
cache13–10-0.0129%19 May →
overpass13–90.0218%19 May →
dust25–13-0.0025%18 May →
inferno13–9-0.0226%17 May →
mirage13–90.0517%17 May →
nuke13–100.0528%17 May →
nuke6–13-0.0115%17 May →
anubis13–11-0.0211%17 May →
overpass13–50.0214%17 May →
mirage13–8-0.0122%17 May →
mirage8–13-0.0216%16 May →
mirage16–130.0422%16 May →
anubis13–10-0.017%16 May →
mirage8–13-0.0129%10 May →
anubis13–70.0225%10 May →
dust25–13-0.0120%10 May →
mirage13–110.0221%10 May →
dust213–60.0120%10 May →
cache13–70.0633%9 May →
cache13–60.0226%9 May →
dust20–9-0.0917%9 May →
ancient10–13-0.016%9 May →
dust211–13-0.0321%9 May →
inferno16–140.0917%9 May →
mirage13–60.0218%9 May →
mirage10–130.0525%9 May →
ancient6–13-0.0725%9 May →
mirage13–110.0017%9 May →
mirage8–130.0430%8 May →
dust27–13-0.0438%8 May →
dust28–130.0218%6 May →
mirage11–130.0116%5 May →
dust213–70.0423%5 May →
mirage13–80.0324%1 May →
dust213–110.0128%1 May →
mirage13–90.0021%1 May →
ancient9–13-0.029%25 Apr →
nuke13–50.0416%25 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0022%25 Apr →
mirage10–130.0019%25 Apr →
overpass13–110.0421%23 Apr →
inferno13–40.0519%22 Apr →
ancient8–130.0422%22 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0520%18 Apr →
anubis16–130.0620%18 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0622%17 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0117%17 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0723%27 Feb →
overpass16–14-0.0218%26 Feb →
nuke13–10-0.0032%19 Feb →
overpass16–140.0326%19 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0817%16 Feb →
dust27–130.0819%9 Feb →
nuke13–60.0026%9 Feb →
overpass3–13-0.0917%9 Feb →
dust213–5-0.0513%3 Feb →
anubis10–130.0114%22 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.