aNdrinosk1 ·.·

aNdrinosk1 ·.· — CS2 Stats

ES76561198056138113[U:1:95872385]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,666Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,588Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22288 of 261675 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,811 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 -206 24 Aug – 12 Nov · 40 days played
22,34026,299peak 26,29924 Aug12 Nov
26,299Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,970Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-08-24

Faceit ELO

  • 159 below peak (1,970)
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 190 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,299 below peak (26,299)
  • +528 over 30 days · improving
  • -206 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,553), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate40.9%48.2%50.9%10.0% short
Shot accuracy17.2%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.241.071.09above
Match win rate51.1%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaNdrinosk1 ·.·FACEITLevel 9 · 1,811 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,970csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning73
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateLLLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.8
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels7.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 75% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 75% on T to 54% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.3
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels8.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time504ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 517ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 26 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 12 Nov →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 15 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 10 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 19ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D206–1430%0.02
infernoA1911–858%0.02
cacheC177–1041%0.04
nukeA169–756%0.02
mirageC135–838%0.01
ancientD82–625%0.01
anubisB63–350%0.01
vertigo—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

202,849Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
8,019Matches
51.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
40.9%Headshot %
17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
34,596MVPs
3,632Hours (in match)
14,093Bombs planted
3,783Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP55,749
AK-4750,742
P2504,970
P904,614
Knife4,252
FAMAS3,308

Lifetime map wins

21,667inferno
8,729dust2
6,512nuke
4,183cbble
4,127train
1,013vertigo
143shorttrain
101dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,277Matches
51%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
88.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8551%1.3420.2
Inferno8068%1.4119.6
Nuke4461%1.2619.0
Ancient3855%1.2218.1
Anubis2730%1.7722.3
Dust22232%0.9815.7
Cache1958%1.2920.8
Vertigo617%1.1516.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
501msReaction time
75.1%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
9.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0117%12 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0428%12 Nov →
dust29–130.0816%12 Nov →
cache4–13-0.0440%12 Nov →
mirage16–140.0515%11 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0813%11 Nov →
anubis9–130.0226%11 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0921%11 Nov →
cache13–20.0521%10 Nov →
anubis13–50.1116%9 Nov →
cache13–110.0725%9 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.0526%9 Nov →
dust211–130.0725%8 Nov →
ancient4–130.0134%8 Nov →
nuke13–100.0614%7 Nov →
nuke13–110.0110%6 Nov →
ancient16–130.0218%5 Nov →
dust213–60.1219%5 Nov →
inferno16–120.0023%5 Nov →
inferno16–130.0926%4 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0224%30 Oct →
cache5–130.0012%30 Oct →
inferno13–70.1030%30 Oct →
cache13–110.0421%30 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0313%29 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0320%27 Oct →
dust213–40.0515%27 Oct →
dust213–30.0719%27 Oct →
dust213–100.0315%26 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0410%26 Oct →
cache11–130.0827%26 Oct →
cache6–130.0224%26 Oct →
inferno13–110.1122%25 Oct →
cache13–160.0825%25 Oct →
nuke13–80.0231%25 Oct →
cache13–90.1133%25 Oct →
inferno13–100.0228%25 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0521%23 Oct →
mirage6–130.048%23 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0418%23 Oct →
nuke13–50.0624%23 Oct →
inferno13–30.0418%23 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0415%22 Oct →
ancient13–70.0129%22 Oct →
mirage8–130.0220%22 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0211%20 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0813%20 Oct →
mirage13–110.0520%20 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0728%20 Oct →
anubis6–3-0.1113%20 Oct →
anubis9–00.1021%20 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0322%18 Oct →
nuke13–40.1128%18 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0019%18 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0130%18 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0414%17 Oct →
cache13–100.0913%15 Oct →
cache11–130.0126%15 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0337%15 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0333%15 Oct →
dust213–20.0915%15 Oct →
ancient15–150.0016%15 Oct →
inferno13–30.0816%14 Oct →
ancient9–130.0422%9 Oct →
mirage13–100.0816%9 Oct →
nuke10–130.0919%8 Oct →
dust24–130.0117%8 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0130%6 Oct →
dust213–160.0629%5 Oct →
nuke9–130.0224%5 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0410%1 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0320%30 Sept →
nuke13–100.0530%30 Sept →
dust24–130.0317%30 Sept →
nuke13–20.1422%26 Sept →
ancient8–130.0429%25 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0236%25 Sept →
inferno9–130.0526%25 Sept →
cache6–130.0824%23 Sept →
inferno10–130.1028%20 Sept →
inferno13–70.0717%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0814%17 Sept →
inferno13–50.0226%17 Sept →
mirage13–40.1031%15 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0925%15 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0420%15 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0214%13 Sept →
vertigo5–90.0433%5 Sept →
cache13–90.0530%2 Sept →
cache3–130.0816%30 Aug →
ancient9–130.0313%29 Aug →
nuke13–60.0913%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0133%28 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0325%28 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0220%27 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0233%27 Aug →
mirage13–80.1024%26 Aug →
dust29–130.0615%24 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0226%24 Aug →
dust213–100.0523%24 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.