kuivis

kuivis — CS2 Stats

76561198054539775[U:1:94274047]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

888Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,880Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,845Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32781 of 252461 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (38 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,845 -1,278 9 Jul – 9 Sept · 19 days played
22,77726,493peak 26,4939 Jul9 Sept
26,611Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-07-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,648 below peak (26,493)
  • +1,068 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,155 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,654), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate46.5%48.2%50.9%4.5% short
Shot accuracy15.8%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.09 short
Match win rate50.6%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkuivisFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,845 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning64
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateWWWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 428ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.7
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time493ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 493ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 28 Aug →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · shelter, 9 Jul →
344msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 29 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 9 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
2–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2312–1152%0.01
mirageC166–1038%-0.01
nukeB158–753%0.03
anubisA138–562%0.02
ancientB136–746%0.01
cacheB136–746%0.02
dust2—43–175%-0.02
debris—10–10%-0.26
poseidon—10–10%0.01
shelter—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,226Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
2,896Matches
50.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
46.5%Headshot %
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
6,342MVPs
1,880Hours (in match)
1,824Bombs planted
726Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,492inferno
3,334nuke
1,600vertigo
1,423dust2
863cbble
395train
233militia
170office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

169Matches
62%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
72.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

15%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2560%1.1916.0
Inferno1553%1.0314.5
Ancient1464%1.0715.8
Anubis1362%1.0013.9
Vertigo1250%1.3816.5
Nuke875%1.2317.8
Overpass771%1.0815.0
Cache3100%0.9414.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
485msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
64.3%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
7.11HE damage / grenade
9.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.7984% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.0323%9 Sept →
anubis13–60.1324%9 Sept →
inferno13–100.0223%9 Sept →
anubis2–130.0129%9 Sept →
mirage5–130.0015%9 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0315%9 Sept →
nuke13–70.0122%9 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0118%7 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0021%7 Sept →
inferno7–130.0612%1 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0634%1 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0015%1 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0220%1 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0017%31 Aug →
cache3–130.0722%31 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.038%31 Aug →
nuke13–30.0928%31 Aug →
inferno7–130.0125%31 Aug →
mirage7–130.0510%28 Aug →
nuke13–30.1412%28 Aug →
anubis13–80.0715%28 Aug →
inferno16–130.0023%28 Aug →
mirage11–130.0410%27 Aug →
mirage13–90.0314%27 Aug →
cache13–60.0935%27 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0210%27 Aug →
anubis13–160.0215%26 Aug →
mirage13–100.0622%26 Aug →
ancient11–130.1026%26 Aug →
inferno13–90.0528%26 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0111%21 Aug →
cache3–10-0.069%21 Aug →
nuke13–70.0836%17 Aug →
nuke13–80.0520%17 Aug →
inferno13–70.0116%17 Aug →
inferno13–40.0012%13 Aug →
nuke13–160.0220%13 Aug →
anubis13–80.0124%13 Aug →
ancient13–60.0216%13 Aug →
nuke8–130.0127%7 Aug →
inferno13–2-0.0216%7 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0129%7 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0530%7 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0330%1 Aug →
inferno15–150.0016%1 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0724%1 Aug →
inferno13–30.0013%1 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0028%1 Aug →
ancient15–150.0512%30 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0233%30 Jul →
ancient11–130.0138%30 Jul →
anubis7–130.0525%30 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0231%30 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0311%30 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0628%30 Jul →
nuke5–130.0719%29 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0520%29 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0213%29 Jul →
cache2–130.0128%29 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0317%29 Jul →
inferno11–130.0313%28 Jul →
cache13–70.0421%28 Jul →
nuke13–70.0116%28 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0417%28 Jul →
anubis16–12-0.0514%24 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0119%21 Jul →
anubis13–70.0314%21 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0118%21 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0316%21 Jul →
debris0–9-0.2613%20 Jul →
poseidon4–90.0121%20 Jul →
inferno6–90.0222%20 Jul →
nuke7–90.0819%20 Jul →
inferno13–80.0616%19 Jul →
ancient13–60.0320%19 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0131%18 Jul →
inferno13–40.0413%18 Jul →
cache13–40.0726%10 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0215%10 Jul →
inferno15–150.0115%10 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0221%10 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0317%10 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0315%10 Jul →
mirage13–40.019%10 Jul →
mirage6–130.0020%10 Jul →
ancient8–130.0212%10 Jul →
cache13–50.0916%9 Jul →
anubis13–50.0614%9 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0420%9 Jul →
inferno13–20.0421%9 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0515%9 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0013%9 Jul →
nuke13–100.0320%9 Jul →
shelter13–110.0463%9 Jul →
nuke0–13-0.0811%9 Jul →
dust213–10.0033%9 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.059%9 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0114%9 Jul →
ancient13–20.0517%9 Jul →
inferno13–20.0019%9 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.