🗿⃤⃢🍷ċøřvïñmëîśŧēŗ

🗿⃤⃢🍷ċøřvïñmëîśŧēŗ — CS2 Stats

IS76561198054082977[U:1:93817249]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

817Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,186Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#42866 of 252732 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,668 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,931 +600 17 Sept – 22 Sept · 4 days played
22,33123,733peak 23,73317 Sept22 Sept
23,733Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,668Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-03-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,668
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 83 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate54.4%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy18.2%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.901.051.060.16 short
Match win rate39.8%45.7%46.3%6.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG🗿⃤⃢🍷ċøřvïñmëîśŧēŗFACEITLevel 7 · 1,668 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,668csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning48
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–46–10Last 10044%Win rateWLWLLTWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time562ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 8–8 · nuke, 19 Mar →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · mirage, 19 Mar →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 14 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC208–1240%-0.01
infernoC187–1139%-0.03
dust2B137–654%-0.01
vertigoA95–456%0.00
nukeD82–625%-0.01
poseidonA85–363%0.01
cacheD72–529%0.01
anubisS54–180%0.03
train—21–150%-0.02
ancient—21–150%-0.04
eldorado—21–150%-0.04
overpass—21–150%0.02
shelter—10–10%0.09
office—10–10%0.06
debris—10–10%-0.00
sanctum—10–10%-0.22

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

231,923Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
6,926Matches
39.8%Match win rate
54.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
18.2%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 7 players
19,524MVPs
4,279Hours (in match)
4,646Bombs planted
3,586Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47106,686
AWP22,755
SG 5537,278
P2503,322
FAMAS3,151

Lifetime map wins

8,991inferno
7,995dust2
3,984vertigo
2,085train
1,957nuke
1,585cbble
233office
155militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

775Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
74.2ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1242%0.8813.3
Mirage1155%1.2315.0
Anubis944%1.0212.6
Dust2757%0.8715.3
Ancient633%0.8814.5
Vertigo580%1.3015.0
Nuke425%0.649.8
Train1100%1.3619.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
558msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
12.01HE damage / grenade
10.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.0976% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–30.0316%14 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0112%11 Oct →
train13–100.0125%11 Oct →
train7–13-0.0524%11 Oct →
vertigo3–13-0.049%28 Sept →
shelter12–120.0932%28 Sept →
vertigo13–20.0224%24 Sept →
vertigo13–70.1219%24 Sept →
office9–130.0639%22 Sept →
dust22–130.0321%22 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0529%22 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.045%22 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0922%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0118%20 Sept →
anubis13–10.0822%20 Sept →
mirage13–60.0330%20 Sept →
anubis13–80.0111%19 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0317%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0518%18 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0919%18 Sept →
cache13–160.0413%18 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0317%17 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0913%17 Sept →
mirage13–110.0228%17 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.029%17 Sept →
inferno13–40.0018%17 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0620%16 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.049%16 Sept →
mirage16–120.048%20 Aug →
dust29–130.0820%18 Aug →
mirage13–110.0528%18 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0733%9 Aug →
dust219–15-0.0120%9 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0417%9 Aug →
dust213–60.0412%9 Aug →
vertigo13–60.0235%9 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0516%31 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0123%31 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0321%11 Jul →
eldorado5–9-0.047%10 Jul →
nuke9–130.0116%10 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0218%10 Jul →
inferno13–80.0515%10 Jul →
dust213–100.0223%10 Jul →
poseidon8–80.0824%10 Jul →
debris8–8-0.0038%10 Jul →
eldorado9–7-0.0527%10 Jul →
mirage13–30.0918%10 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0519%9 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0415%9 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0424%9 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0421%9 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0617%9 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0321%7 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0714%1 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0226%1 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0318%1 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.1126%1 Jul →
anubis13–30.0029%1 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0315%1 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0524%1 Jul →
poseidon9–6-0.0531%27 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.0922%27 Jun →
poseidon9–70.0235%27 Jun →
vertigo9–60.0712%26 Jun →
poseidon9–50.0235%26 Jun →
dust27–130.0116%24 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0627%24 Jun →
vertigo7–9-0.0326%24 Jun →
inferno8–8-0.0216%24 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0625%23 Jun →
poseidon5–9-0.0416%12 Jun →
cache11–13-0.0523%1 Jun →
cache13–90.0920%31 May →
cache3–130.0337%31 May →
cache12–120.0116%31 May →
anubis13–90.0825%31 May →
anubis12–12-0.0320%31 May →
inferno7–90.0316%22 Apr →
vertigo4–9-0.1018%19 Apr →
poseidon6–9-0.0124%19 Apr →
nuke9–6-0.049%19 Apr →
poseidon9–10.0518%17 Apr →
nuke3–9-0.057%17 Apr →
inferno2–9-0.1912%17 Apr →
inferno16–14-0.0214%15 Apr →
vertigo13–100.0914%3 Apr →
vertigo7–9-0.1139%19 Mar →
nuke8–80.1219%19 Mar →
mirage13–10.0745%19 Mar →
poseidon9–50.0419%19 Mar →
inferno9–60.1025%19 Mar →
mirage13–70.0619%18 Mar →
dust212–12-0.0820%18 Mar →
nuke7–130.0124%12 Mar →
mirage10–130.0122%12 Mar →
overpass2–130.0116%12 Mar →
overpass13–60.0416%12 Mar →
sanctum1–9-0.2238%10 Mar →
inferno8–80.0233%10 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.