Chmielcik

Chmielcik — CS2 Stats

AM76561198053947842[U:1:93682114]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

761Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,661Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,571 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,571 → 1,571
+2Tracked matches · now 761
−3.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,571 +0 2 Sept – 16 Sept · 4 observations
1,5711,571peak 1,5712 Sept16 Sept
1,571Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-03-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,571
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 180 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches28——
Win rate39%——
K/D0.86——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.3%46.8%48.2%2.9% short
Shot accuracy13.9%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.801.061.070.27 short
Match win rate41.2%46.3%46.9%5.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChmielcikFACEITLevel 8 · 1,571 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,571csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning52
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateLLWWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.9pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time536ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 25 May →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · inferno, 25 May →
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 7 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 1 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC187–1139%-0.01
anubisA1811–761%0.00
cacheA1710–759%-0.00
ancientA148–657%-0.01
nukeA148–657%0.00
overpassS75–271%-0.00
mirageC52–340%-0.03
dust2—43–175%-0.01
vertigo—20–20%0.03
poseidon—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

110,289Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
5,815Matches
41.2%Match win rate
45.3%Headshot %
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
8,228MVPs
1,606Hours (in match)
3,955Bombs planted
921Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,432
AWP15,218
P902,632
UMP-451,870
MAC-101,556

Lifetime map wins

9,578dust2
4,834inferno
2,883nuke
1,814shorttrain
1,258safehouse
1,189dust
1,068train
929cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

172Matches
55%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
74.2ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3647%1.2814.6
Ancient3345%1.0314.8
Anubis3070%1.1215.8
Nuke1942%0.9914.4
Overpass1471%1.1915.9
Cache1457%1.0314.9
Mirage956%0.8613.9
Dust2743%1.0415.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
535msReaction time
24.9%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
9.46HE damage / grenade
8.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.8996% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0721%18 Sept →
inferno8–130.0122%18 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0117%15 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0219%15 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0213%12 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0414%12 Sept →
anubis13–60.0416%12 Sept →
ancient13–100.0319%12 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0113%8 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0112%7 Sept →
nuke7–130.0131%7 Sept →
cache13–100.0222%7 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0415%4 Sept →
anubis13–90.0524%4 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.099%4 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0316%4 Sept →
nuke13–110.0338%1 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0516%1 Sept →
cache7–130.0628%1 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0526%1 Sept →
cache10–130.0319%31 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.0512%31 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0916%21 Aug →
ancient13–100.0111%21 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0420%21 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0114%21 Aug →
inferno10–130.0325%12 Aug →
cache13–90.0111%12 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0127%9 Aug →
anubis13–90.0112%9 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0227%9 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0319%9 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0337%8 Aug →
dust213–60.0217%8 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0513%8 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0528%8 Aug →
dust213–40.0725%8 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0011%8 Aug →
inferno13–100.0124%8 Aug →
anubis7–130.0019%8 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0019%8 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0013%8 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0618%2 Aug →
ancient13–60.0533%2 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0018%2 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0117%1 Aug →
nuke13–100.0317%1 Aug →
anubis13–20.0514%1 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0126%1 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0115%1 Aug →
anubis11–130.0216%21 Jul →
nuke13–40.0218%21 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0426%21 Jul →
inferno13–70.0015%15 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0420%15 Jul →
cache13–50.0519%15 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0416%10 Jul →
anubis7–130.0327%10 Jul →
vertigo8–80.0631%2 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.0726%28 Jun →
inferno8–8-0.0038%28 Jun →
cache6–13-0.0419%24 Jun →
overpass13–6-0.0314%24 Jun →
anubis13–100.0120%24 Jun →
cache13–9-0.038%22 Jun →
nuke13–20.0013%22 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0212%22 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.079%18 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0130%18 Jun →
overpass7–00.008%18 Jun →
anubis9–130.0524%18 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.0423%8 Jun →
nuke13–30.0320%8 Jun →
inferno9–130.0026%8 Jun →
anubis13–80.0122%7 Jun →
ancient13–20.0818%7 Jun →
cache13–110.0231%7 Jun →
inferno9–20.1144%25 May →
poseidon6–9-0.0815%25 May →
ancient13–40.0318%13 May →
cache13–110.0220%13 May →
mirage13–5-0.0116%13 May →
vertigo8–8-0.0019%13 May →
anubis10–13-0.0413%4 May →
overpass13–10-0.0210%4 May →
anubis10–13-0.0621%4 May →
cache16–140.0521%1 May →
inferno13–110.0317%1 May →
cache12–12-0.0215%1 May →
cache13–40.0113%1 May →
nuke9–60.0636%1 May →
inferno8–8-0.0315%1 May →
inferno10–13-0.0323%8 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0426%8 Apr →
inferno14–16-0.0325%8 Apr →
overpass4–130.0537%8 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.0310%25 Mar →
anubis13–11-0.0632%25 Mar →
overpass13–20.0618%25 Mar →
overpass19–16-0.0317%17 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.