BOT current

BOT current — CS2 Stats

76561198050138811[U:1:89873083]Steam profile ↗

1,229Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,951Purple band · top ~8.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21302 of 54256 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,692 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBOT currentFACEITLevel 8 · 1,692 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,951 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning41
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51454Last 10051%Win rateLWTWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression3.2
Utility3.9
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.1
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time533ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–7
130Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 10mirageWeakest map · 39% over 33
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC33132039%-0.00
dust2C25111444%-0.00
ancientA127558%-0.02
infernoA117464%-0.00
cacheS108280%0.03
anubisA74357%0.00
nuke21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 33). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

673Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19953%1.0114.9
Ancient12360%1.0315.8
Dust211048%1.0115.6
Anubis8539%0.9715.3
Inferno5944%0.9514.7
Nuke2245%0.8613.9
Vertigo850%1.3015.1
Train540%0.7511.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.3%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
555msReaction time
25.1%T opening success
33.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
6.94HE damage / grenade
5.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4997 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.0968% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0518%27 Aug
inferno13–30.0834%26 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0033%26 Aug
inferno9–60.0117%26 Aug
mirage13–90.0234%26 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0332%26 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0230%25 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0014%25 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0224%25 Aug
dust22–00.0450%25 Aug
mirage13–70.0638%25 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0424%25 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0123%25 Aug
dust28–130.0223%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0313%21 Aug
mirage6–130.0216%20 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0113%19 Aug
dust29–13-0.0330%19 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0319%19 Aug
anubis13–20.0421%18 Aug
inferno9–30.0854%18 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0418%17 Aug
ancient12–13-0.0511%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0217%11 Aug
cache13–50.0412%10 Aug
ancient13–110.0122%10 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0321%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.144%9 Aug
cache5–13-0.0118%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0126%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0729%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0411%6 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0414%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0411%27 Jul
dust27–130.0324%27 Jul
dust20–13-0.1332%27 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0120%26 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0416%26 Jul
dust213–110.018%26 Jul
dust22–130.0327%26 Jul
ancient16–130.0416%24 Jul
dust26–13-0.0114%24 Jul
dust213–5-0.0324%24 Jul
mirage13–70.1119%24 Jul
dust212–120.0024%24 Jul
mirage13–50.0117%21 Jul
dust212–16-0.0123%21 Jul
mirage13–60.0127%21 Jul
ancient13–70.0219%21 Jul
dust214–16-0.0221%21 Jul
anubis13–00.0324%21 Jul
mirage13–100.0325%21 Jul
dust213–4-0.0031%21 Jul
cache12–120.0614%8 Jul
cache13–8-0.0313%8 Jul
cache13–10.0164%8 Jul
cache13–30.0867%8 Jul
cache13–20.0263%7 Jul
cache13–30.0748%7 Jul
cache13–20.0225%7 Jul
mirage15–15-0.1056%6 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0333%6 Jul
dust27–130.0141%6 Jul
mirage13–40.0213%2 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0716%30 Jun
inferno13–11-0.030%30 Jun
mirage5–90.0914%25 Jun
nuke22–19-0.0118%15 Jun
inferno13–110.0124%11 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0522%30 May
anubis13–16-0.0018%10 May
ancient13–6-0.0316%8 May
ancient13–90.0314%7 May
dust213–11-0.0419%30 Apr
dust29–130.0935%27 Apr
mirage13–50.0213%27 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0531%24 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0232%24 Apr
cache13–80.0726%23 Apr
dust216–130.0125%22 Apr
mirage13–100.0719%22 Apr
anubis7–130.0216%21 Apr
dust213–80.0519%21 Apr
ancient7–13-0.096%21 Apr
dust29–130.0033%20 Apr
dust213–60.0617%18 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0140%18 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0117%17 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0327%16 Apr
mirage9–130.0721%16 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0318%16 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0321%14 Apr
ancient17–19-0.0523%13 Apr
ancient16–140.0419%13 Apr
anubis19–15-0.0022%13 Apr
mirage8–130.0634%13 Apr
dust28–13-0.0435%13 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0333%13 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0523%13 Apr
dust213–4-0.0315%8 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →