Τάκης Ζαχαράτος (c

Τάκης Ζαχαράτος (c — CS2 Stats

76561198050066032[U:1:89800304]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,705Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,642Hours in CS
CSDB Rating2.8 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,172 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,785 +462 19 Sept – 10 Oct · 5 days played
13,89014,785peak 14,78519 Sept10 Oct
14,785Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,172Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-09-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,172
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 29 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate34.5%43.8%44.8%10.3% short
Shot accuracy13.2%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.881.021.030.16 short
Match win rate45.1%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGΤάκης Ζαχαράτος (cFACEITLevel 5 · 1,172 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,172csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim30
Positioning33
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLLLTLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +59ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 686ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim3.0
Utility6.2
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 60% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.0
Positioning3.3
Utility6.2
Mechanics3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 2.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time631ms+43ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy11.3%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 10.0% → last ⅓ avg 11.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 10 Oct →
27%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 12 Oct →
414msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 15 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
11–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2611–1542%-0.03
dust2B2312–1152%-0.03
mirageB199–1047%-0.03
ancientS128–467%-0.03
cacheS64–267%-0.02
anubisD51–420%-0.06
vertigo—20–20%-0.16
debris—22–0100%0.07
nuke—22–0100%0.06
eldorado—10–10%-0.13
poseidon—11–0100%-0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

126,277Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
8,136Matches
45.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
34.5%Headshot %
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
13,343MVPs
3,642Hours (in match)
15,668Bombs planted
1,784Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,254
AWP5,964
P2505,008
UMP-454,009
P903,927
FAMAS3,777

Lifetime map wins

18,075inferno
15,570dust2
9,309vertigo
2,029nuke
1,472train
324dust
302cbble
278italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,198Matches
50%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
64.2ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26050%0.8411.7
Ancient13350%0.9313.1
Inferno13045%0.8511.0
Dust211955%0.8211.9
Anubis4450%0.8112.4
Nuke3253%0.8111.6
Train3253%1.0013.9
Overpass2462%0.6811.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.2%Headshot accuracy
27.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
63.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
626msReaction time
21.2%T opening success
26.0%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.26HE damage / grenade
11.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.2003% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.203% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–16-0.0510%7 Nov →
inferno9–13-0.0821%7 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0525%5 Nov →
vertigo8–8-0.2311%30 Oct →
eldorado6–9-0.133%30 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0918%30 Oct →
debris9–10.0110%19 Oct →
debris9–00.125%19 Oct →
nuke9–00.139%19 Oct →
nuke9–2-0.013%19 Oct →
inferno9–40.0816%19 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0013%16 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0113%15 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0215%15 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0313%15 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0313%15 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0412%15 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.066%14 Oct →
inferno13–90.028%14 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0713%14 Oct →
mirage13–80.0127%12 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.085%12 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.075%12 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.107%10 Oct →
dust215–15-0.048%10 Oct →
vertigo8–8-0.096%10 Oct →
poseidon9–5-0.0523%10 Oct →
inferno9–30.1512%10 Oct →
overpass8–8-0.048%10 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0615%10 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.045%10 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.045%10 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0210%10 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0211%10 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.039%9 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.072%9 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0412%28 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0812%28 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0514%28 Sept →
dust213–70.0210%28 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0519%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.053%27 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0318%27 Sept →
dust29–13-0.038%27 Sept →
cache13–80.038%26 Sept →
inferno22–18-0.0211%26 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0212%25 Sept →
dust29–13-0.049%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0612%25 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0614%25 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0511%22 Sept →
dust213–11-0.019%22 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0415%22 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0710%22 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.060%21 Sept →
ancient6–10.0611%21 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0414%21 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.075%21 Sept →
dust23–13-0.066%21 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0815%21 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0820%21 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.068%20 Sept →
ancient19–17-0.059%20 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0118%20 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0210%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0311%19 Sept →
inferno13–90.0214%19 Sept →
ancient13–40.009%19 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0817%19 Sept →
cache15–15-0.046%19 Sept →
dust213–10-0.049%19 Sept →
ancient13–100.0215%19 Sept →
dust213–40.0117%19 Sept →
inferno13–30.029%19 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0312%19 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.098%19 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0515%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.077%19 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.078%18 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0620%18 Sept →
mirage13–90.004%18 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0610%18 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0615%18 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0215%18 Sept →
ancient13–60.0410%18 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.1110%8 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0315%8 Sept →
dust213–90.0011%8 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0410%7 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0717%7 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.033%7 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.097%7 Sept →
mirage13–20.084%7 Sept →
cache16–140.003%6 Sept →
mirage13–110.0812%6 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0012%6 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.052%6 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.068%6 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0010%6 Sept →
dust213–10-0.056%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.