Otcov sin

Otcov sin — CS2 Stats

SN76561198049712352[U:1:89446624]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,721Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,115Top 25% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18191 of 229398 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,771 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,115 → 25,115
0Faceit ELO · 1,771 → 1,771
+6Tracked matches · now 1,721
0.0ppWin rate · 63.3% → 63.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 55 days played since 29 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,115 +5,116 29 May18 Sept · 32 days played
19,99926,297peak 26,29729 May18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,771 +0 30 Aug18 Sept · 5 observations
1,7711,771peak 1,77130 Aug18 Sept
26,297Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,771Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2026-05-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,771
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 230 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,182 below peak (26,297)
  • -1,182 over 30 days · declining
  • +3,385 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,885 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOtcov sinFACEITLevel 9 · 1,771 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,115 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,771csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning50
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY65323Last 10065%Win rateWLWWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −79ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time551ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 20 Aug
60%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · dust2, 30 Aug
352msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · ancient, 23 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 15 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2617965%0.01
mirageB1910953%0.01
infernoS1511473%-0.01
ancientS1410471%0.00
cacheA117464%0.02
nukeS76186%-0.02
anubisD62433%-0.00
overpass220100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

630Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
78.9ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14349%1.0114.6
Dust212754%1.0715.7
Inferno10748%0.9615.1
Ancient7162%1.0816.4
Nuke5240%1.0015.6
Anubis5246%0.9714.9
Cache2673%1.2318.7
Overpass1747%1.0616.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
553msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
6.46HE damage / grenade
8.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4312 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3554% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0320%17 Sept
dust26–13-0.0123%16 Sept
mirage13–20.1024%13 Sept
cache13–60.0737%4 Sept
cache19–17-0.0519%3 Sept
anubis10–130.0319%2 Sept
dust22–5-0.0620%1 Sept
dust213–30.0427%31 Aug
dust213–5-0.0348%31 Aug
dust20–13-0.0160%30 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0535%30 Aug
dust213–60.0123%27 Aug
anubis4–100.0114%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0219%24 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0117%23 Aug
cache11–13-0.0427%20 Aug
mirage13–40.1416%20 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0721%19 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0523%18 Aug
dust22–13-0.1060%18 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0517%18 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0416%17 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0617%16 Aug
inferno13–7-0.1025%15 Aug
cache13–80.0223%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0515%14 Aug
ancient13–110.0023%13 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0115%13 Aug
inferno13–100.0221%2 Aug
inferno13–110.0124%31 Jul
inferno13–60.0233%30 Jul
inferno13–60.0728%29 Jul
dust28–13-0.0219%27 Jul
dust27–13-0.0419%26 Jul
ancient13–100.0424%25 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0038%24 Jul
dust24–13-0.0819%24 Jul
dust216–130.0327%23 Jul
inferno10–130.0229%23 Jul
mirage9–10.0614%22 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0338%22 Jul
ancient7–13-0.049%20 Jul
anubis3–8-0.040%20 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0320%18 Jul
ancient15–150.0128%18 Jul
dust213–80.0119%18 Jul
cache13–70.1039%18 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0121%18 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0123%18 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0223%17 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0119%17 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0115%16 Jul
dust213–50.0218%16 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0631%15 Jul
cache13–10.0725%15 Jul
inferno13–40.0213%15 Jul
nuke13–60.0110%15 Jul
ancient13–90.0123%15 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0332%13 Jul
dust213–40.0632%12 Jul
nuke13–110.0727%11 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0714%11 Jul
dust213–10.0924%11 Jul
cache13–90.0525%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0218%11 Jul
cache3–130.0529%10 Jul
anubis13–90.0231%9 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0421%9 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0755%9 Jul
cache4–130.0133%9 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0128%9 Jul
cache8–130.0014%8 Jul
cache13–7-0.0229%8 Jul
inferno13–80.0027%7 Jul
dust213–70.0632%7 Jul
dust213–60.0427%7 Jul
mirage13–100.0128%6 Jul
mirage6–130.0321%6 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0117%2 Jul
dust213–4-0.0131%2 Jul
mirage15–150.0122%2 Jul
dust213–100.0541%2 Jul
ancient13–40.0822%2 Jul
dust213–10-0.0120%1 Jul
dust213–110.0530%1 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0225%22 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0131%21 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0519%21 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0326%20 Jun
ancient13–30.0920%8 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0315%4 Jun
dust213–90.0120%4 Jun
dust213–70.0326%4 Jun
mirage13–110.0732%3 Jun
dust26–130.0229%3 Jun
mirage15–150.0231%31 May
dust213–8-0.0214%31 May
inferno13–11-0.0519%30 May
mirage13–70.0018%29 May
mirage11–13-0.0027%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →