KILLACOPS69

KILLACOPS69 — CS2 Stats

FR76561198048644027[U:1:88378299]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

719Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,961Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,980Light Blue band · top ~55% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 31 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,980 -8,601 31 Jul21 Sept · 26 days played
9,98018,581peak 18,58131 Jul21 Sept
18,581Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-07-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 8,601 below peak (18,581)
  • -5,705 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 20 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2514+11
Win rate20%43%−23pp
K/D1.020.72+0.30
Headshot %49%62%−13pp

Measured 14 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; previous 11 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,275), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.1%44.8%45.7%2.6% short
Shot accuracy4.0%12.5%12.7%8.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.861.031.050.19 short
Match win rate42.3%45.2%45.7%3.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKILLACOPS69FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER9,980 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning52
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43552Last 10043%Win rateWLLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −8.6pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility3.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch5.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.2
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time564ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 1 Sept
43%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 17 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 19 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D1851328%-0.00
nukeC1881044%0.02
infernoB178947%-0.01
mirageD1641225%-0.00
ancientS118373%0.01
anubisC104640%-0.01
cacheA106460%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,836Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
2,672Matches
42.3%Match win rate
43.1%Headshot %
4.0%Shot accuracy
5,535MVPs
995Hours (in match)
1,743Bombs planted
438Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,470dust2
3,410nuke
2,600inferno
554vertigo
538train
67office
18assault
18dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

66Matches
56%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
86.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21753%1.1418.5
Mirage1560%1.1618.1
Ancient1070%1.1719.9
Nuke757%1.3118.1
Inferno633%0.9318.2
Anubis540%0.9115.4
Cache475%1.0017.0
Vertigo250%0.8015.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
562msReaction time
48.5%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.74HE damage / grenade
2.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.9706 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.8456% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.0136%21 Sept
mirage11–130.0416%21 Sept
anubis6–130.0110%21 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0420%21 Sept
dust213–11-0.0514%20 Sept
inferno6–130.0820%20 Sept
cache7–130.0815%20 Sept
mirage8–130.0017%19 Sept
ancient13–80.0317%19 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0424%15 Sept
cache2–13-0.0423%13 Sept
nuke13–30.0838%13 Sept
ancient13–110.0528%13 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0827%13 Sept
ancient13–30.0419%12 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0233%9 Sept
cache7–13-0.0331%9 Sept
mirage10–130.0326%9 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0227%9 Sept
cache13–8-0.0123%9 Sept
dust25–13-0.0218%9 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0316%9 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0012%9 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0620%9 Sept
nuke13–50.0115%8 Sept
dust26–130.0029%8 Sept
nuke10–130.0016%8 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0717%7 Sept
dust213–8-0.0329%7 Sept
inferno9–130.0516%7 Sept
dust27–13-0.0921%7 Sept
dust215–150.0923%7 Sept
anubis11–130.0427%6 Sept
dust23–13-0.0329%6 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0014%6 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0215%5 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0214%5 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0415%4 Sept
ancient13–90.0419%1 Sept
nuke3–50.0726%1 Sept
dust213–10.2131%1 Sept
mirage13–90.0325%1 Sept
nuke13–30.0919%31 Aug
cache13–10-0.0318%27 Aug
ancient7–130.0525%27 Aug
dust24–13-0.0323%26 Aug
ancient5–13-0.027%26 Aug
dust213–50.0025%25 Aug
inferno7–130.0341%25 Aug
cache14–160.0217%25 Aug
mirage11–130.0018%24 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0122%24 Aug
mirage14–160.0317%24 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0730%24 Aug
anubis4–13-0.058%20 Aug
dust25–13-0.0628%20 Aug
inferno13–60.0229%19 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0717%19 Aug
nuke13–40.1822%19 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0621%18 Aug
cache13–4-0.0118%18 Aug
dust20–13-0.0516%18 Aug
inferno13–80.0323%18 Aug
ancient13–70.0014%18 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0642%18 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0324%18 Aug
dust213–8-0.0116%18 Aug
cache13–80.0113%18 Aug
nuke11–130.0518%17 Aug
dust26–130.0321%17 Aug
anubis13–30.0526%17 Aug
cache13–50.0219%17 Aug
dust24–13-0.0343%17 Aug
mirage13–90.0315%17 Aug
nuke13–110.1529%17 Aug
inferno13–100.0424%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0415%15 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0417%15 Aug
anubis13–110.0113%15 Aug
mirage5–13-0.058%15 Aug
nuke13–80.0217%15 Aug
ancient13–40.0540%15 Aug
mirage10–130.0316%15 Aug
mirage13–80.0026%15 Aug
inferno13–10.0426%15 Aug
cache13–9-0.0221%14 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0225%14 Aug
anubis11–130.0114%14 Aug
anubis3–13-0.1013%13 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0517%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.0017%11 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0521%10 Aug
ancient13–110.0218%7 Aug
nuke6–130.0113%4 Aug
dust28–13-0.0121%1 Aug
nuke6–130.0424%1 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0320%1 Aug
dust24–130.0320%1 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0816%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0419%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →