NozeyGoblin

NozeyGoblin — CS2 Stats

US76561198048398787[U:1:88133059]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

892Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,842Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 892 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,473 +4,850 7 May – 19 Jul · 21 days played
21,62326,586peak 26,5867 May19 Jul
26,708Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-05-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning60
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −83ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.8
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 665ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 9 May →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 1–5 · inferno, 9 May →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · cache, 4 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 13 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16infernoWeakest map · 29% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3018–1260%0.02
infernoD216–1529%-0.00
nukeS1611–569%0.00
ancientD134–931%-0.00
dust2S64–267%0.03
cache—42–250%-0.00
anubis—41–325%0.00
overpass—42–250%0.00
train—10–10%-0.03
vertigo—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

120,220Lifetime kills
1.35K/D · Top 10% of tracked players
4,802Matches
51.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
50.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
9,986MVPs
1,842Hours (in match)
1,777Bombs planted
766Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,603
AWP19,424
P2502,751
SSG 082,236
FAMAS1,239

Lifetime map wins

4,530dust2
3,845nuke
3,121inferno
1,485train
1,289office
912assault
743vertigo
571cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

182Matches
56%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3247%1.1115.6
Mirage2638%0.9314.8
Dust22273%1.1113.9
Nuke2167%1.0614.8
Anubis1457%1.0115.1
Inferno1354%1.1617.9
Train1040%1.0418.6
Cache250%1.2417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
579msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
49.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
8.63HE damage / grenade
8.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7531% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0229%4 Sept →
ancient13–30.0822%4 Sept →
cache13–100.0522%4 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0329%2 Sept →
inferno13–80.0322%27 Aug →
ancient13–20.0620%27 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.035%25 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0221%20 Aug →
inferno10–130.0231%14 Aug →
dust213–90.0831%14 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0119%13 Aug →
inferno13–40.0614%11 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0416%6 Aug →
mirage13–40.1213%4 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.038%1 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0032%30 Jul →
inferno16–130.0313%21 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0523%19 Jul →
ancient11–130.0218%18 Jul →
anubis13–110.0725%18 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0715%16 Jul →
nuke16–13-0.0414%14 Jul →
mirage10–130.0336%14 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0132%13 Jul →
nuke13–00.0816%13 Jul →
mirage13–00.1222%13 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0118%11 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0216%11 Jul →
ancient13–70.0127%11 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0220%11 Jul →
inferno13–70.028%11 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0110%10 Jul →
nuke13–40.0230%10 Jul →
inferno13–70.0014%9 Jul →
mirage13–100.0817%9 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.028%8 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0314%8 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0411%8 Jul →
mirage13–30.0719%5 Jul →
inferno10–130.0219%5 Jul →
overpass11–130.0819%26 Jun →
mirage13–60.014%1 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0212%1 Jun →
inferno4–130.0729%31 May →
mirage13–80.0122%31 May →
inferno11–13-0.0414%30 May →
mirage13–40.0113%29 May →
inferno10–13-0.0118%28 May →
dust212–120.0216%28 May →
mirage13–8-0.0113%28 May →
mirage3–13-0.0320%26 May →
ancient13–16-0.056%26 May →
nuke13–100.0226%26 May →
overpass13–9-0.0521%25 May →
inferno3–9-0.1517%25 May →
overpass9–13-0.0323%25 May →
ancient9–13-0.0220%25 May →
inferno14–160.0323%25 May →
ancient15–150.0323%24 May →
ancient15–15-0.0118%24 May →
overpass13–40.0217%24 May →
mirage13–9-0.038%24 May →
mirage11–130.0120%24 May →
inferno9–130.0412%22 May →
mirage10–130.0411%22 May →
mirage13–70.0431%22 May →
nuke5–13-0.0412%21 May →
anubis10–13-0.0414%21 May →
cache13–7-0.0126%21 May →
inferno7–13-0.0230%19 May →
mirage10–130.0322%19 May →
mirage15–150.0317%18 May →
nuke13–9-0.0324%18 May →
mirage15–15-0.0222%18 May →
inferno6–13-0.0617%15 May →
mirage13–90.0523%15 May →
nuke13–100.0314%15 May →
dust213–70.0421%14 May →
dust25–13-0.0120%14 May →
mirage13–60.0226%14 May →
nuke8–13-0.0128%12 May →
mirage13–50.1123%12 May →
ancient3–13-0.0719%12 May →
mirage6–13-0.0121%12 May →
inferno10–130.0230%11 May →
mirage13–110.0520%10 May →
ancient11–13-0.0513%10 May →
dust213–90.0117%10 May →
inferno11–13-0.0329%9 May →
mirage13–4-0.0313%9 May →
nuke13–40.0518%9 May →
nuke6–13-0.0722%9 May →
train8–13-0.0326%9 May →
nuke13–80.1524%9 May →
ancient13–30.0619%9 May →
inferno1–5-0.0243%9 May →
vertigo3–130.0218%9 May →
dust213–110.0520%9 May →
anubis8–130.0322%7 May →
mirage16–140.0019%7 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.