naJ.S

naJ.S — CS2 Stats

DE76561198047478629[U:1:87212901]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,295Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,393Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,601 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,601 → 1,601
+73Tracked matches · now 1,295
+6.7ppWin rate · 53.3% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,758 -1,810 24 Apr – 3 Jul · 3 days played
24,75826,568peak 26,56824 Apr3 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,601 +0 1 Sept – 20 Sept · 3 observations
1,6011,601peak 1,6011 Sept20 Sept
26,568Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,601Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-04-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,601
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 150 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.8%46.8%48.2%2.4% short
Shot accuracy16.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.061.07above
Match win rate69.2%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnaJ.SFACEITLevel 8 · 1,601 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,601csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning64
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLLWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.9pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility6.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 67% on T to 47% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time514ms−113ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 11–13 · cache, 11 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–9 · inferno, 17 May →
352msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · cache, 14 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 11 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 77% over 22mirageWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2217–577%-0.02
dust2A1912–763%-0.01
cacheC176–1135%-0.00
anubisB136–746%-0.02
ancientC125–742%-0.01
mirageD50–50%-0.03
overpassC52–340%-0.01
nuke—31–233%-0.01
boulder—10–10%-0.01
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.05
poseidon—10–10%-0.03
warden—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

128,761Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
10,708Matches
69.2%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 8 players
45.8%Headshot %
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15,777MVPs
2,595Hours (in match)
6,062Bombs planted
1,524Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,246
AWP17,552
P2505,104
P903,549
FAMAS2,864
SSG 082,444

Lifetime map wins

20,668dust2
11,335inferno
7,350nuke
1,350train
1,130vertigo
861cbble
384dust
326safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

854Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
80.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis15752%1.0816.9
Inferno14254%1.1216.8
Ancient10543%1.0916.9
Dust28853%1.1817.3
Nuke3956%1.1416.5
Vertigo3339%1.1418.0
Cache2759%1.3520.5
Mirage2030%0.7512.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
515msReaction time
67.0%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.46HE damage / grenade
10.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–13-0.0315%30 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0014%23 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0512%23 Oct →
dust213–80.0123%14 Oct →
ancient16–130.0021%12 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0525%12 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.085%12 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0410%10 Oct →
inferno13–100.0220%9 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0426%9 Oct →
anubis16–120.0316%9 Oct →
dust22–13-0.1120%9 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.0414%8 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.028%8 Oct →
dust213–80.0437%8 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0614%8 Oct →
dust213–90.0422%8 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.0120%7 Oct →
anubis13–60.0226%7 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0522%7 Oct →
mirage11–130.0725%6 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0121%6 Oct →
cache13–60.0317%6 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0623%4 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0212%2 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.038%2 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0437%2 Oct →
dust213–30.0721%1 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0028%30 Sept →
inferno13–110.0118%14 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0532%13 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0432%11 Sept →
anubis13–90.0816%3 Sept →
anubis13–80.0422%2 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0532%2 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0221%15 Aug →
cache5–13-0.047%14 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0518%13 Aug →
inferno13–100.0017%30 Jul →
inferno13–70.0121%30 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.1325%22 Jul →
inferno13–50.0114%22 Jul →
boulder10–13-0.0128%21 Jul →
fachwerk13–8-0.0510%21 Jul →
dust213–100.0432%19 Jul →
cache13–50.0924%18 Jul →
cache16–120.0728%12 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0327%11 Jul →
nuke13–10.0638%11 Jul →
cache11–130.1118%11 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0246%9 Jul →
overpass11–13-0.0816%3 Jul →
ancient0–13-0.0214%3 Jul →
overpass13–90.0414%3 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0431%3 Jul →
overpass16–130.0228%3 Jul →
inferno13–60.0421%3 Jul →
dust26–130.0017%3 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.037%19 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0518%17 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0616%17 Jun →
ancient13–60.0433%14 Jun →
inferno13–60.0616%14 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0621%13 Jun →
inferno13–40.0110%13 Jun →
cache16–14-0.0711%7 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0519%6 Jun →
inferno16–19-0.0722%17 May →
inferno5–9-0.1150%17 May →
poseidon2–9-0.0335%12 May →
ancient8–13-0.0514%12 May →
cache8–13-0.0611%11 May →
overpass11–130.0022%5 May →
mirage9–13-0.0217%5 May →
ancient13–80.0220%5 May →
dust213–4-0.087%5 May →
cache12–12-0.0024%30 Apr →
cache8–13-0.0328%30 Apr →
cache13–110.0524%30 Apr →
ancient2–13-0.0123%30 Apr →
cache12–12-0.0129%30 Apr →
cache13–11-0.0221%30 Apr →
cache11–13-0.0111%29 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0316%28 Apr →
dust213–90.0527%27 Apr →
mirage2–13-0.008%27 Apr →
inferno9–6-0.1036%26 Apr →
anubis13–3-0.0433%24 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0450%24 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0316%24 Apr →
inferno13–20.0323%24 Apr →
inferno13–5-0.0320%24 Apr →
ancient13–90.0531%24 Apr →
dust213–90.0520%24 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0615%24 Apr →
inferno16–120.0518%24 Apr →
ancient0–13-0.0943%15 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.065%8 Apr →
warden10–13-0.037%8 Apr →
dust26–130.0025%3 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.