Kitty

Kitty — CS2 Stats

JP76561198046926191[U:1:86660463]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

997Tracked matches76%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,211Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating23,936Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29976 of 230430 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,261 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+293Premier CS Rating · 23,643 → 23,936
0Faceit ELO · 1,261 → 1,261
+6Tracked matches · now 997
+3.5ppWin rate · 72.4% → 75.9%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 5 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,936 +2,413 5 Aug20 Sept · 20 days played
18,99623,936peak 23,9365 Aug20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,261 +0 14 Sept19 Sept · 2 observations
1,2611,261peak 1,26114 Sept19 Sept
24,063Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,261Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,261
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 90 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,936
  • +3,936 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,064 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.4%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy12.0%12.0%12.4%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.021.04above
Match win rate34.3%44.7%45.2%10.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKittyFACEITLevel 5 · 1,261 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER23,936 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,261csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning50
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53434Last 10053%Win rateWWLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.0
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time546ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 16–12 · mirage, 19 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · nuke, 8 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · ancient, 26 Aug
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB189950%0.01
dust2B178947%0.00
mirageC167944%0.01
ancientS1510567%0.02
anubisB137654%0.00
infernoA127558%0.02
nukeA85363%0.03
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,099Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
3,218Matches
34.3%Match win rate
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
12.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
4,616MVPs
1,211Hours (in match)
1,810Bombs planted
686Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,244dust2
3,143inferno
1,074train
739nuke
295vertigo
243cbble
74office
39lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

181Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
83.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24262%1.2317.6
Ancient4154%1.2018.3
Inferno3050%1.1316.6
Mirage2148%1.1617.3
Anubis1942%0.9515.8
Cache1040%1.4116.8
Nuke757%1.4615.4
Overpass683%1.1815.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.3%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
533msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
13.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.658% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.0228%20 Sept
cache16–130.0321%20 Sept
inferno4–130.0324%19 Sept
mirage13–100.0716%19 Sept
mirage16–120.1122%19 Sept
inferno13–100.0619%19 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0411%18 Sept
anubis13–4-0.0412%18 Sept
cache7–13-0.063%12 Sept
cache13–10.0020%11 Sept
anubis11–130.0412%11 Sept
inferno13–110.0127%11 Sept
ancient14–160.0311%11 Sept
anubis13–100.044%11 Sept
nuke13–100.0421%10 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0112%10 Sept
cache13–50.0819%9 Sept
dust213–11-0.0416%9 Sept
mirage13–10.1031%9 Sept
ancient13–90.0514%9 Sept
anubis13–00.0413%9 Sept
cache11–13-0.0112%8 Sept
nuke13–110.0116%8 Sept
nuke2–00.04100%8 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0114%8 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0112%8 Sept
inferno13–80.0012%8 Sept
dust213–11-0.0419%8 Sept
ancient13–50.0314%8 Sept
mirage9–4-0.024%8 Sept
dust23–13-0.0111%7 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0213%7 Sept
cache13–80.0219%5 Sept
dust213–00.0725%5 Sept
anubis14–160.0312%5 Sept
mirage13–100.0723%5 Sept
cache13–8-0.0519%4 Sept
dust27–13-0.0312%4 Sept
dust210–130.0224%3 Sept
nuke13–100.0122%3 Sept
anubis13–80.0012%3 Sept
cache13–40.0121%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0415%3 Sept
ancient13–60.0814%30 Aug
inferno15–150.019%30 Aug
anubis8–130.0317%30 Aug
dust214–16-0.0517%30 Aug
cache13–11-0.0315%29 Aug
anubis13–100.0113%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0220%29 Aug
inferno16–140.0114%29 Aug
cache13–7-0.019%28 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0120%27 Aug
nuke13–20.0820%27 Aug
dust213–80.1118%27 Aug
anubis16–12-0.0214%27 Aug
ancient13–30.0512%26 Aug
ancient13–110.0412%26 Aug
mirage12–10.058%26 Aug
cache11–13-0.0113%26 Aug
inferno13–80.0316%26 Aug
ancient13–80.0812%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0528%26 Aug
overpass11–13-0.0220%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0620%25 Aug
cache16–140.0622%25 Aug
cache9–130.0218%24 Aug
ancient13–90.0319%24 Aug
dust28–13-0.0229%24 Aug
dust213–16-0.0416%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0313%23 Aug
cache9–13-0.0017%23 Aug
inferno2–13-0.017%22 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0629%22 Aug
dust213–20.1017%22 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0313%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0121%22 Aug
cache9–130.0117%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0210%21 Aug
cache12–160.0512%21 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0415%21 Aug
inferno13–100.0329%20 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0425%20 Aug
dust213–6-0.0331%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0315%20 Aug
inferno13–90.0712%14 Aug
inferno2–60.0628%14 Aug
dust25–130.0122%14 Aug
nuke7–130.0318%14 Aug
mirage12–120.0516%14 Aug
nuke6–130.0312%9 Aug
dust213–20.0625%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0018%9 Aug
cache10–130.0313%9 Aug
mirage5–130.0210%9 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0212%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.0117%8 Aug
dust213–11-0.0020%8 Aug
ancient13–80.0810%5 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0311%5 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →