SmellsTasty

SmellsTasty — CS2 Stats

GB76561198046013330[U:1:85747602]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

293Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
889Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,197), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate40.0%41.3%41.9%1.9% short
Shot accuracy19.6%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.050.960.98above
Match win rate40.1%42.5%43.3%3.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSmellsTastyFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim40
Positioning46
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52462Last 10052%Win rateLLLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim4.0
Utility2.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.0
Positioning4.6
Utility2.7
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time630ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 16–5 · dust2, 5 Apr
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · overpass, 6 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 6 Jul
16–2Biggest win · inferno, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
51Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 14mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB31141745%-0.01
dust2A1810856%0.00
overpassS1410471%0.02
mirageD124833%-0.00
ancientS96367%-0.02
cacheC94544%-0.01
nuke21150%-0.01
vertigo220100%0.06
grail1010%-0.08
anubis110100%-0.01
train1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,549Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
2,307Matches
40.1%Match win rate
40.0%Headshot %
19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 2 players
5,292MVPs
889Hours (in match)
2,441Bombs planted
492Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,530
AWP4,347
Knife1,486
P901,310
P2501,036

Lifetime map wins

5,692dust2
4,606inferno
1,284nuke
303train
283cbble
190vertigo
140office
100italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
28.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.3%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
639msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
6.75HE damage / grenade
4.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3753% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass9–130.0215%5 Feb
nuke9–13-0.035%2 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0123%2 Feb
dust211–13-0.0713%1 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0421%31 Jan
ancient11–13-0.086%31 Jan
inferno10–13-0.039%31 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0027%31 Jan
mirage11–13-0.086%30 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0111%30 Jan
dust213–10-0.028%30 Jan
inferno13–1-0.0619%30 Jan
overpass10–130.0118%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.073%25 Aug
grail7–13-0.0810%6 Jul
overpass13–1-0.0033%6 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0511%6 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0119%6 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0430%6 Jul
train5–13-0.0420%6 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1627%6 Jul
dust213–40.0220%3 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0425%3 Jul
dust213–6-0.0528%24 Mar
overpass13–90.0128%19 Sept
inferno13–110.0315%18 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0415%18 Sept
overpass13–60.0613%18 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0613%18 Sept
overpass13–20.1318%17 Sept
ancient13–11-0.028%17 Sept
overpass13–70.0920%16 Sept
overpass13–80.0111%16 Sept
vertigo13–00.1420%16 Sept
ancient0–7-0.0615%16 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0223%11 Sept
mirage4–130.0119%11 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0413%5 Sept
overpass7–13-0.037%5 Sept
mirage3–13-0.048%4 Sept
inferno3–130.0427%4 Sept
inferno13–9-0.013%3 Sept
ancient13–30.0416%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0510%2 Sept
inferno13–80.0113%1 Sept
overpass16–14-0.0110%22 Aug
dust212–16-0.0720%21 Aug
cache5–16-0.0629%21 Aug
dust216–100.0211%20 Aug
cache9–16-0.066%17 Aug
ancient16–70.019%17 Aug
dust216–12-0.0210%14 Aug
cache13–16-0.039%12 Aug
inferno12–16-0.078%12 Aug
dust215–150.0212%9 Aug
ancient16–50.0810%8 Aug
dust215–15-0.0116%8 Aug
cache16–12-0.019%8 Aug
inferno16–90.0111%8 Aug
inferno8–16-0.0512%8 Aug
overpass16–13-0.0211%7 Aug
dust216–100.0013%6 Aug
overpass9–5-0.017%6 Aug
inferno16–10-0.0414%5 Aug
inferno16–20.134%2 Aug
cache16–6-0.027%2 Aug
cache16–90.036%31 Jul
dust210–16-0.029%29 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0417%27 Jul
cache16–80.0210%26 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0110%26 Jul
inferno16–13-0.027%24 Jul
overpass16–90.0614%24 Jul
dust216–60.036%8 May
cache14–160.1112%7 May
cache0–6-0.070%7 May
mirage13–160.0313%7 May
mirage16–120.1119%18 Apr
inferno4–16-0.026%9 Apr
dust216–40.0515%7 Apr
inferno16–130.0810%5 Apr
dust26–1-0.0019%5 Apr
dust216–50.1512%5 Apr
mirage8–160.0810%2 Apr
inferno10–16-0.0119%1 Apr
inferno8–16-0.0119%1 Apr
mirage0–16-0.046%23 Mar
overpass10–16-0.0414%5 Aug
inferno16–110.0922%10 Jul
inferno1–16-0.0312%10 Jul
inferno9–16-0.0214%10 Jun
inferno10–16-0.028%27 Apr
dust213–160.0312%26 Apr
dust214–16-0.0217%31 Jan
inferno16–50.1225%28 Jan
inferno9–60.0110%3 Dec
inferno3–16-0.0314%28 Nov
inferno14–160.0217%17 Nov
dust210–16-0.0212%16 Nov
mirage9–70.0520%15 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →