Obatovski — CS2 Stats

76561198045472498[U:1:85206770]

1,229Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,203Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating4,870Grey band · top ~79.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Jun 2026 (104 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,870 -870 20 Nov – 29 Jun · 29 days played
3,5867,243peak 7,24320 Nov29 Jun
7,243Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2025-11-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,373 below peak (7,243)
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 130 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,269), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate41.8%40.9%41.3%meets
Shot accuracy11.4%14.2%12.7%1.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.840.950.950.11 short
Match win rate38.4%42.1%42.6%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGObatovskiFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER4,870 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim38
Positioning38
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–56–3Last 10041%Win rateLWLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −125ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim3.8
Utility4.0
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 696ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.8
Positioning3.8
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time699ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 719ms → last ⅓ avg 699ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–4 · overpass, 6 Dec →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · dust2, 14 Mar →
469msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 29 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 21 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 14ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D186–1233%-0.03
infernoD175–1229%-0.03
overpassB178–947%-0.02
mirageC167–944%-0.01
nukeB147–750%-0.02
anubisB84–450%-0.03
ancientD51–420%-0.05
office—22–0100%-0.05
train—21–150%-0.01
cache—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,434Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
3,160Matches
38.4%Match win rate
41.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 1 players
11.4%Shot accuracy
8,268MVPs
1,203Hours (in match)
3,022Bombs planted
773Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,521
AWP8,045
P901,834
MP91,601
FAMAS1,547

Lifetime map wins

6,620inferno
4,361dust2
2,644train
2,442nuke
1,967vertigo
842cbble
61lake
56safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

48Matches
42%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
73.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21040%1.0714.8
Mirage786%0.9410.3
Inferno333%0.8813.0
Anubis30%0.9918.0
Nuke250%1.6520.0
Vertigo1100%2.0020.0
Ancient10%0.6210.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
696msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
13.1%Flash assists
9.74HE damage / grenade
2.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3636 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.7571% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0714%29 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0013%25 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0525%23 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0717%23 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.034%23 Jun →
nuke10–6-0.018%23 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0424%22 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0419%22 Jun →
mirage13–40.0323%22 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0926%22 Jun →
dust213–100.0122%22 Jun →
overpass7–13-0.0218%22 Jun →
overpass13–60.0311%22 Jun →
nuke1–13-0.0319%22 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0216%22 Jun →
overpass4–13-0.0129%22 Jun →
nuke13–1-0.038%21 Jun →
cache6–13-0.0217%21 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0710%20 Jun →
mirage13–3-0.0216%18 Jun →
dust28–130.0013%16 Jun →
dust26–13-0.055%16 Jun →
dust212–120.0040%14 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0622%13 Mar →
overpass13–10-0.0323%11 Mar →
ancient16–12-0.049%3 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0210%1 Mar →
dust213–40.0713%1 Mar →
nuke9–1-0.0629%28 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0717%28 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0229%28 Feb →
dust213–110.0120%28 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.066%27 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0816%27 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.019%25 Feb →
mirage13–2-0.0314%24 Feb →
dust25–13-0.123%20 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0318%20 Feb →
overpass5–130.0023%8 Feb →
nuke7–130.0018%7 Feb →
dust214–16-0.0117%5 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0318%5 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.039%5 Feb →
overpass6–13-0.049%5 Feb →
ancient2–13-0.0417%5 Feb →
anubis13–2-0.039%5 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.088%5 Feb →
overpass15–15-0.0118%2 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0512%2 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0222%2 Feb →
anubis13–80.0218%2 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0512%1 Feb →
overpass13–6-0.119%1 Feb →
nuke13–16-0.0116%1 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.1011%30 Jan →
mirage14–16-0.0213%30 Jan →
nuke13–10-0.0217%30 Jan →
inferno13–2-0.0319%30 Jan →
anubis16–14-0.0511%29 Jan →
mirage13–50.0412%29 Jan →
office13–3-0.050%28 Jan →
mirage5–13-0.0420%28 Jan →
anubis13–30.0312%28 Jan →
nuke13–40.0430%28 Jan →
office13–9-0.0411%27 Jan →
mirage13–160.0516%27 Jan →
inferno13–16-0.0616%27 Jan →
nuke13–5-0.0422%7 Jan →
dust215–15-0.0723%5 Jan →
dust22–13-0.0713%4 Jan →
dust213–4-0.0110%4 Jan →
overpass11–130.0116%27 Dec →
inferno13–4-0.0329%24 Dec →
mirage11–13-0.0116%24 Dec →
train13–40.0221%22 Dec →
mirage13–50.0413%22 Dec →
overpass11–13-0.0211%22 Dec →
inferno6–13-0.0926%21 Dec →
mirage13–70.0014%20 Dec →
ancient10–13-0.0122%20 Dec →
train11–13-0.0415%20 Dec →
dust210–13-0.0313%16 Dec →
inferno12–160.0217%15 Dec →
dust213–3-0.0017%15 Dec →
nuke11–13-0.0413%15 Dec →
nuke10–13-0.0718%13 Dec →
overpass13–6-0.0510%13 Dec →
dust29–130.0010%6 Dec →
overpass13–40.0711%6 Dec →
dust25–13-0.0216%6 Dec →
inferno7–13-0.0120%6 Dec →
overpass13–11-0.0110%5 Dec →
inferno2–13-0.0130%5 Dec →
inferno5–13-0.0010%4 Dec →
overpass13–6-0.0115%4 Dec →
inferno13–10-0.0113%3 Dec →
mirage10–130.0123%21 Nov →
overpass2–13-0.0524%21 Nov →
overpass6–13-0.0219%21 Nov →
inferno9–130.0317%20 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.