UnbearableBear — CS2 Stats
76561198043782545[U:1:83516817]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 56.8% | 52.8% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 13.1% | 13.7% | 0.6% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.20 | 1.08 | above |
| Match win rate | 48.7% | 49.2% | meets |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.
Sharp aimer
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 98% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 8.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 37 | 25–12 | 68% | 0.02 | |
| C | 16 | 6–10 | 38% | 0.04 | |
| S | 10 | 8–2 | 80% | 0.02 | |
| S | 8 | 6–2 | 75% | 0.05 | |
| S | 7 | 5–2 | 71% | 0.07 | |
| C | 7 | 3–4 | 43% | 0.08 | |
| — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | -0.02 | |
| — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | 0.02 | |
| — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.08 | |
| poseidon | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | -0.09 |
| eldorado | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.17 |
| debris | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.12 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dust2 | 10 | 80% | 1.96 | 23.1 |
| Mirage | 9 | 67% | 1.69 | 22.6 |
| Inferno | 8 | 75% | 1.73 | 20.6 |
| Ancient | 4 | 75% | 1.80 | 29.5 |
| Nuke | 2 | 100% | 1.66 | 22.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| poseidon | 0–9 | -0.17 | 25% | 27 Aug → | |
| 0–9 | -0.12 | 15% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 4–9 | 0.08 | 26% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 9–7 | 0.17 | 29% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.31 | 27% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.04 | 23% | 26 Aug → | ||
| eldorado | 8–8 | 0.17 | 26% | 26 Aug → | |
| 5–9 | -0.05 | 16% | 26 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 3–9 | -0.02 | 17% | 26 Aug → | |
| 2–9 | -0.18 | 14% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.12 | 33% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 21% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.03 | 18% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 26% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.05 | 29% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 29% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 36% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 16% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.06 | 52% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 21% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.06 | 14% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.15 | 26% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.06 | 23% | 21 Aug → | ||
| debris | 9–4 | 0.12 | 18% | 21 Aug → | |
| 7–9 | 0.14 | 14% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.00 | 26% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.02 | 18% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 7–1 | 0.05 | 13% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | 0.04 | 53% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 21% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 33% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 28% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.03 | 20% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 21% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.14 | 32% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.14 | 19% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.02 | 9% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 20% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 24% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 28% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.10 | 12% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.06 | 20% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.01 | 19% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 36% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.07 | 9% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 19% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 50% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.07 | 0% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.15 | 27% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 23% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.19 | 15% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.00 | 17% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 33% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 27% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.00 | 17% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.05 | 41% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 20% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.01 | 18% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 16% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.05 | 39% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.03 | 22% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.10 | 16% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.06 | 16% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.10 | 25% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 15% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.18 | 35% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | -0.03 | 29% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.01 | 22% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.02 | 37% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.06 | 18% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.00 | 20% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.10 | 17% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 24% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 25% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.03 | 28% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.00 | 27% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.02 | 22% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.03 | 20% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.04 | 30% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.06 | 28% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 32% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.01 | 24% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.02 | 36% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 0–4 | -0.07 | 0% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.03 | 19% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 21% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 13% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.02 | 22% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.03 | 24% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.10 | 22% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.05 | 13% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 16% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.18 | 21% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 16% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.13 | 24% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.03 | 17% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 6–0 | 0.29 | 24% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.08 | 35% | 21 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.