GoodLyn

GoodLyn — CS2 Stats

FR76561198043747647[U:1:83481919]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

913Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,685Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,310Top 50% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#78901 of 259209 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,397 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,310 +311 16 Aug – 21 Oct · 14 days played
19,22420,310peak 20,31016 Aug21 Oct
20,310Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,397Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,397
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 134 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,310
  • +1,086 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,690 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate24.3%44.8%45.7%21.4% short
Shot accuracy17.6%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.301.031.05above
Match win rate56.7%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGoodLynFACEITLevel 6 · 1,397 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,310 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,397csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning39
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–39–7Last 10054%Win rateLWLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −158ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.3
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning3.9
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time654ms+59ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–2 · poseidon, 22 Oct →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 1–4 · dust2, 31 Oct →
414msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · office, 29 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · train, 12 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
9–1In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 69% over 16mirageWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
poseidonS1611–569%-0.00
infernoB136–746%-0.01
dust2A106–460%0.01
ancientB105–550%0.00
cacheB84–450%0.01
mirageD72–529%-0.01
nukeD62–433%0.00
vertigoC52–340%0.06
anubisA53–260%0.04
office—42–250%0.03
shelter—42–250%0.10
boulder—33–0100%0.01
train—21–150%0.04
debris—22–0100%-0.05
fachwerk—21–150%-0.04
eldorado—11–0100%-0.03
italy—10–10%-0.04
overpass—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

270,625Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
10,162Matches
56.7%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 6 players
24.3%Headshot %
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
17,824MVPs
3,141Hours (in match)
8,688Bombs planted
3,185Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,524
AWP30,246
AUG17,184
P9014,571
SG 55314,071
Knife12,078
FAMAS8,555

Lifetime map wins

14,345inferno
8,792dust2
3,545nuke
2,354lake
2,238cbble
2,147bank
2,097train
1,805office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

386Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
84.1ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3642%1.0316.2
Dust23554%1.0116.5
Mirage3060%1.2616.3
Anubis2446%1.0616.1
Nuke1974%1.3017.9
Ancient1650%1.1417.4
Train838%1.1115.1
Overpass475%1.4218.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
616msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
9.60HE damage / grenade
2.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4732 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2639% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust21–40.0246%31 Oct →
office13–11-0.0013%31 Oct →
office4–13-0.0117%29 Oct →
poseidon9–20.2724%22 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0518%21 Oct →
poseidon5–9-0.185%21 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.056%21 Oct →
poseidon6–9-0.1315%21 Oct →
poseidon9–5-0.1713%20 Oct →
poseidon9–7-0.0723%14 Oct →
poseidon9–40.0523%14 Oct →
poseidon9–20.0133%14 Oct →
poseidon9–50.2324%12 Oct →
poseidon9–30.0824%12 Oct →
train13–20.0715%12 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0416%9 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0629%9 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0619%9 Oct →
train4–130.0116%8 Oct →
inferno6–90.026%8 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0715%3 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0120%3 Oct →
inferno13–90.0127%3 Oct →
cache13–50.0416%2 Oct →
debris9–2-0.158%2 Oct →
nuke13–60.0220%24 Sept →
mirage5–130.0322%24 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0515%24 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0617%23 Sept →
vertigo8–130.049%23 Sept →
inferno13–80.0331%16 Sept →
fachwerk5–13-0.0321%11 Sept →
office9–130.0523%11 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0020%10 Sept →
inferno8–1-0.0025%8 Sept →
eldorado9–2-0.0313%8 Sept →
inferno4–130.0216%8 Sept →
ancient13–60.0414%7 Sept →
cache15–150.0112%7 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0717%6 Sept →
dust213–60.0824%6 Sept →
mirage8–130.0713%6 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0530%6 Sept →
dust29–130.0211%6 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.053%5 Sept →
office13–90.0717%5 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.018%5 Sept →
ancient13–100.0315%4 Sept →
inferno6–130.0215%3 Sept →
cache11–13-0.098%3 Sept →
dust210–130.0216%2 Sept →
cache13–80.0117%2 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.1124%2 Sept →
debris9–40.0510%2 Sept →
poseidon5–90.0215%2 Sept →
cache6–130.068%1 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0212%31 Aug →
dust20–6-0.017%31 Aug →
cache7–130.0213%31 Aug →
inferno15–150.0610%31 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0016%31 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0210%31 Aug →
dust213–110.0224%29 Aug →
cache13–3-0.039%27 Aug →
dust213–110.0219%27 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.038%26 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0215%25 Aug →
italy12–12-0.0417%25 Aug →
boulder13–110.0317%25 Aug →
vertigo13–30.0816%25 Aug →
shelter9–130.0518%25 Aug →
anubis13–70.0316%25 Aug →
poseidon4–9-0.1213%24 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0112%24 Aug →
shelter12–120.1417%22 Aug →
shelter13–40.0322%22 Aug →
ancient4–0-0.0220%22 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.0414%22 Aug →
anubis13–30.2423%21 Aug →
shelter13–100.1926%21 Aug →
boulder7–2-0.0213%21 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0514%21 Aug →
poseidon9–3-0.0020%21 Aug →
poseidon9–60.024%21 Aug →
poseidon9–70.0617%19 Aug →
ancient12–12-0.0112%19 Aug →
boulder13–50.0316%19 Aug →
poseidon9–30.0132%19 Aug →
nuke10–130.1019%18 Aug →
vertigo13–4-0.028%18 Aug →
fachwerk13–7-0.0510%17 Aug →
ancient6–130.0517%17 Aug →
cache13–30.0714%17 Aug →
ancient13–40.0114%16 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0113%16 Aug →
ancient10–130.0514%16 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0324%16 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0214%16 Aug →
overpass13–110.0318%16 Aug →
vertigo9–130.1324%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.