hass

hass — CS2 Stats

CA76561198043599865[U:1:83334137]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,575Tracked matches68%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,448Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+10Tracked matches · now 1,575
+8.6ppWin rate · 59.3% → 67.9%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,579 -1,065 7 Jan – 19 Jan · 3 days played
21,57922,644peak 22,6447 Jan19 Jan
22,644Peak Premier in tracked matches
56Days played since 2026-01-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate44.9%46.8%48.2%3.3% short
Shot accuracy13.4%13.0%13.3%meets
Kill/death ratio1.241.061.07above
Match win rate40.4%46.3%46.9%6.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhassFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning55
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateLWWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 651ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.2
Utility5.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.5
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time638ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 18 Jan →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 18 Jan →
453msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · cache, 13 May →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 16 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 24nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2414–1058%0.02
mirageC208–1240%-0.00
cacheB147–750%0.01
dust2A127–558%-0.00
anubisA116–555%0.00
ancientD93–633%-0.00
nukeD51–420%-0.02
overpass—32–167%0.07
vertigo—11–0100%0.14
sanctum—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

89,320Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
4,189Matches
40.4%Match win rate
44.9%Headshot %
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,915MVPs
1,571Hours (in match)
3,694Bombs planted
1,082Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,232dust2
4,070inferno
2,328vertigo
2,069nuke
803train
533cbble
69office
22italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

144Matches
62%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
79.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3557%0.9614.6
Anubis3566%1.1316.8
Ancient2352%1.1317.5
Inferno2176%1.1314.7
Vertigo1191%1.2316.7
Overpass825%0.7611.5
Nuke757%1.2314.9
Dust2250%1.1414.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
640msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
7.69HE damage / grenade
6.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5416% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–130.0111%7 Oct →
cache13–100.0619%4 Oct →
dust213–40.0321%4 Oct →
inferno13–60.0228%4 Oct →
anubis13–80.0916%3 Oct →
cache7–130.0114%3 Oct →
anubis9–130.0115%18 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.019%13 Aug →
cache13–80.0513%3 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0411%2 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0322%15 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0132%9 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0014%5 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0310%5 Jul →
cache3–13-0.064%5 Jul →
overpass13–80.0924%5 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0219%4 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0226%4 Jul →
ancient9–1-0.038%29 Jun →
cache13–100.0116%29 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0421%28 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0425%26 Jun →
cache13–60.1029%26 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0120%16 Jun →
anubis13–9-0.0413%16 Jun →
cache9–13-0.0220%2 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0212%1 Jun →
cache13–80.0716%23 May →
cache13–100.0115%23 May →
vertigo9–30.1429%20 May →
inferno9–7-0.0611%20 May →
sanctum9–60.0116%19 May →
nuke8–8-0.0610%19 May →
inferno9–3-0.0429%19 May →
mirage13–6-0.0212%18 May →
mirage8–13-0.0020%16 May →
anubis7–13-0.028%16 May →
mirage6–130.0224%13 May →
cache12–120.0322%13 May →
ancient14–16-0.0321%10 May →
mirage13–8-0.0619%10 May →
cache13–2-0.0114%30 Apr →
cache11–130.0120%28 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.019%23 Apr →
inferno13–110.0526%16 Apr →
inferno13–10.0217%16 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0220%14 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0823%9 Apr →
dust213–8-0.0412%9 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0130%7 Apr →
inferno13–110.0426%4 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0016%2 Apr →
inferno13–7-0.019%27 Mar →
dust213–60.0421%27 Mar →
inferno7–130.0524%22 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0533%19 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0625%18 Mar →
mirage13–90.0319%18 Mar →
anubis13–110.0625%18 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0328%17 Mar →
inferno10–130.055%13 Mar →
dust28–130.0721%13 Mar →
anubis11–130.0114%13 Mar →
inferno10–130.0415%10 Mar →
mirage13–70.0723%10 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0322%5 Mar →
dust24–130.0528%5 Mar →
mirage12–120.0021%5 Mar →
mirage7–130.0217%5 Mar →
ancient4–130.0315%5 Mar →
anubis13–40.0312%4 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0418%20 Feb →
overpass13–30.1134%14 Feb →
mirage6–130.0219%7 Feb →
inferno13–110.0614%2 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.0411%1 Feb →
mirage3–10.1027%1 Feb →
anubis13–70.0113%1 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0416%31 Jan →
dust213–100.0518%31 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0223%31 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.039%20 Jan →
anubis1–13-0.0514%20 Jan →
inferno9–40.1920%20 Jan →
inferno13–90.0411%19 Jan →
overpass11–130.0211%19 Jan →
ancient2–8-0.028%18 Jan →
inferno9–00.2538%18 Jan →
ancient10–130.0217%15 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0621%15 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0416%8 Jan →
inferno13–80.0222%8 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0916%7 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0129%7 Jan →
inferno13–110.0325%5 Jan →
ancient13–30.1325%5 Jan →
nuke9–130.0420%5 Jan →
inferno10–13-0.0213%5 Jan →
dust212–12-0.0018%5 Jan →
mirage12–120.0220%4 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.