Erosive — CS2 Stats
76561198043103183[U:1:82837455]Steam profile ↗
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 66.0% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 17.6% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.12 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 57.1% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 26 | 9–17 | 35% | 0.03 | |
| B | 20 | 10–10 | 50% | 0.05 | |
| B | 18 | 9–9 | 50% | 0.03 | |
| A | 17 | 10–7 | 59% | 0.06 | |
| D | 12 | 4–8 | 33% | 0.04 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | 0.00 | |
| — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | 0.05 | |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.05 | |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.07 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 229 | 52% | 1.34 | 19.0 |
| Ancient | 226 | 53% | 1.47 | 20.2 |
| Dust2 | 149 | 56% | 1.30 | 18.3 |
| Anubis | 125 | 58% | 1.47 | 20.4 |
| Overpass | 45 | 64% | 1.53 | 20.5 |
| Inferno | 35 | 57% | 1.31 | 20.1 |
| Cache | 14 | 71% | 1.79 | 23.7 |
| Nuke | 12 | 50% | 1.41 | 19.9 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.4309% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 29% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.04 | 26% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 17–19 | -0.03 | 20% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 25% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.06 | 29% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 20% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 20% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.02 | 26% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 19% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.06 | 23% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.00 | 25% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.12 | 25% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.02 | 19% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.09 | 19% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 28% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.04 | 26% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 33% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.06 | 29% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.04 | 15% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 0–2 | -0.09 | 0% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.07 | 26% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.02 | 42% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.02 | 24% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 0–4 | -0.09 | 67% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 30% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 18% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 30% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.00 | 29% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.05 | 26% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.08 | 29% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.10 | 43% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.02 | 32% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.07 | 29% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.02 | 27% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.16 | 26% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 0–12 | 0.05 | 32% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.01 | 33% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 24% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 21% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.06 | 26% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.08 | 23% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.00 | 21% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.04 | 30% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.14 | 21% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.08 | 21% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.10 | 19% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.09 | 25% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.06 | 23% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 27% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 27% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.10 | 40% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 18% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 43% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.04 | 32% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.01 | 25% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.06 | 22% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.08 | 25% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 26% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 8–1 | 0.10 | 42% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 17% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.18 | 31% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.14 | 23% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.13 | 26% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.13 | 20% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.05 | 19% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 19% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.04 | 22% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.12 | 24% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.07 | 23% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.02 | 24% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.04 | 34% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.03 | 17% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 30% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.03 | 20% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.05 | 42% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.07 | 17% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.08 | 24% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.09 | 30% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.07 | 28% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.02 | 29% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.09 | 26% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.27 | 30% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.09 | 24% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.10 | 30% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 23% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.02 | 25% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.19 | 24% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.07 | 27% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.05 | 0% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 23% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.01 | 33% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.00 | 23% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.13 | 34% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.03 | 28% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 23% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.01 | 28% | 27 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.