eckkneipenhvstler

eckkneipenhvstler — CS2 Stats

DE76561198042860558[U:1:82594830]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,399Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,756Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33439 of 251265 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,931 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 23,756 → 23,756
0Faceit ELO · 1,931 → 1,931
+1Tracked matches · now 2,399
−1.6ppWin rate · 48.3% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,756 +2,003 23 Apr – 17 Sept · 33 days played
20,00023,891peak 23,89123 Apr17 Sept
23,891Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,931Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-04-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,931
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 70 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 135 below peak (23,891)
  • +198 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,481 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,244 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeckkneipenhvstlerFACEITLevel 9 · 1,931 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,756 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,931csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning37
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateLWWLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.6
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning3.7
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time624ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+4.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 27 Apr →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 1–4 · dust2, 5 Jul →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · cache, 28 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 7 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 26anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2615–1158%-0.02
dust2B2010–1050%-0.02
cacheB179–853%-0.02
anubisC166–1038%0.00
overpassC83–538%-0.02
infernoC52–340%-0.03
mirage—41–325%-0.05
nuke—20–20%-0.02
vertigo—21–150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,536Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
78.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis36853%1.0016.2
Ancient36354%0.9815.5
Inferno27046%0.9716.1
Overpass11450%0.9814.9
Dust26042%0.8213.8
Train4356%1.0015.3
Mirage3631%0.8313.0
Vertigo3540%0.8514.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
629msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
8.30HE damage / grenade
7.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4977 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.8064% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass8–13-0.0518%25 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0215%7 Sept →
cache13–50.0538%30 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0024%30 Aug →
dust213–30.0124%30 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0433%30 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0218%29 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0511%29 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0819%28 Aug →
cache13–3-0.0150%28 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0216%28 Aug →
anubis7–130.0426%17 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0329%13 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0133%13 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0021%12 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0621%5 Aug →
cache10–130.0424%29 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0415%29 Jul →
mirage8–3-0.0222%18 Jul →
mirage2–6-0.0520%18 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0426%18 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0924%18 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0234%18 Jul →
inferno0–13-0.090%18 Jul →
dust25–1-0.0030%17 Jul →
ancient6–0-0.0038%17 Jul →
dust216–13-0.0521%12 Jul →
ancient16–14-0.0517%12 Jul →
dust210–130.0330%11 Jul →
ancient13–50.0322%11 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0227%11 Jul →
cache13–60.0219%10 Jul →
cache13–50.0229%10 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0214%10 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0222%10 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0814%5 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0118%5 Jul →
dust21–40.2060%5 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0338%5 Jul →
ancient12–16-0.0025%5 Jul →
anubis0–7-0.1017%3 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0821%28 Jun →
anubis2–13-0.0217%26 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0726%26 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.0317%26 Jun →
anubis13–7-0.0328%26 Jun →
ancient13–3-0.0217%26 Jun →
dust213–2-0.0220%26 Jun →
overpass13–7-0.0112%23 Jun →
dust213–6-0.0653%23 Jun →
dust213–80.0123%22 Jun →
anubis14–16-0.0218%21 Jun →
overpass13–110.0215%20 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0118%20 Jun →
ancient13–30.0115%20 Jun →
overpass15–15-0.0027%19 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0124%19 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.0120%19 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0828%18 Jun →
overpass10–2-0.0432%17 Jun →
ancient13–40.0915%17 Jun →
anubis10–130.0227%15 Jun →
anubis13–40.0423%15 Jun →
dust213–6-0.0417%12 Jun →
overpass12–160.0213%12 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0336%12 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0215%7 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0225%5 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0124%4 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0223%4 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0012%3 Jun →
vertigo12–120.0621%3 Jun →
dust20–9-0.0817%1 Jun →
ancient13–16-0.0616%31 May →
dust29–130.0127%30 May →
inferno13–6-0.0120%30 May →
anubis7–130.0024%29 May →
dust29–13-0.0629%29 May →
ancient13–70.0329%29 May →
anubis16–120.0122%29 May →
ancient7–13-0.0217%24 May →
ancient13–10-0.0222%13 May →
cache7–13-0.0116%13 May →
vertigo13–70.0123%10 May →
anubis13–4-0.0314%10 May →
ancient8–13-0.0213%9 May →
ancient11–13-0.0116%8 May →
cache10–13-0.0316%8 May →
anubis10–13-0.0613%8 May →
cache13–7-0.0215%8 May →
cache13–9-0.0019%7 May →
cache13–1-0.0013%7 May →
cache10–13-0.0822%3 May →
cache3–13-0.0418%3 May →
overpass10–13-0.0710%1 May →
cache13–11-0.0122%29 Apr →
anubis13–10.2514%27 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0418%25 Apr →
cache13–16-0.0527%23 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0418%23 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.