pøwder — CS2 Stats

DE76561199229537814[U:1:1269272086]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,052Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,880Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3282 of 20665 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,990 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning43

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–43Last 10057%Win rateLLWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5

Aggression4.0

Utility5.8

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels0.5

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning4.3

Utility5.8

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time570ms−6ms

first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms

Headshot accuracy20.3%+7.1%

first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–5

13–1Biggest win — ancient

10Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 0% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	24	12–12	50%	0.00
ancient	A	24	15–9	63%	0.01
anubis	S	21	14–7	67%	-0.00
inferno	S	10	7–3	70%	-0.03
cache	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
overpass	S	7	5–2	71%	0.01
nuke	D	5	0–5	0%	-0.03
mirage	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,557Matches

51%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

82.0ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	349	52%	1.14	17.3
Anubis	343	57%	1.13	16.8
Inferno	256	47%	1.06	16.0
Dust2	116	41%	1.02	14.9
Overpass	81	51%	1.10	16.1
Mirage	71	46%	1.03	15.5
Vertigo	52	58%	1.12	16.7
Nuke	49	47%	1.00	15.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy

36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.3%Spray accuracy

73.9%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

564msReaction time

15.9%T opening success

47.9%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

3.8%Flash assists

7.41HE damage / grenade

12.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 15.9431% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	10–13	-0.04	18%	15 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.22	38%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	20%	9 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.08	18%	7 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	16%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.01	18%	5 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	10%	5 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.02	21%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	38%	2 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.05	23%	31 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	13%	31 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	33%	29 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	19%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.12	23%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.05	17%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	13%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	14%	27 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.02	19%	27 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.06	31%	26 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	14%	26 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	16%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	20%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	10%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–1	-0.01	33%	16 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	22%	16 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.05	0%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.02	27%	16 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.03	50%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.00	12%	14 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.01	11%	14 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	15%	14 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.06	19%	12 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.01	18%	12 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.00	17%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	17%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.07	14%	10 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.16	30%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	13%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.01	37%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.04	8%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.01	19%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.04	8%	2 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	7%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	8%	30 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	8%	29 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	23%	27 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.03	15%	27 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	23%	26 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.02	17%	26 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.01	10%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.04	28%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.07	20%	26 Jun →
overpass	13–7	-0.05	17%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	16%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	28%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	15%	23 Jun →
anubis	16–12	0.02	26%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.04	18%	22 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.06	20%	21 Jun →
anubis	14–16	0.03	20%	21 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.09	23%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.00	13%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.07	19%	20 Jun →
overpass	8–13	0.00	17%	19 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.06	18%	18 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	21%	18 Jun →
overpass	10–2	-0.01	15%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–4	-0.03	8%	17 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	11%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–4	-0.00	16%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.04	14%	13 Jun →
anubis	16–13	0.04	16%	13 Jun →
inferno	2–13	0.01	23%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.01	17%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.03	16%	12 Jun →
overpass	12–16	-0.06	14%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.05	19%	12 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	9%	6 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	4%	5 Jun →
dust2	14–16	-0.07	11%	5 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.01	14%	5 Jun →
anubis	13–16	0.03	12%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.03	11%	4 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.01	14%	4 Jun →
dust2	0–9	-0.07	22%	1 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.01	6%	30 May →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	12%	30 May →
ancient	13–6	0.04	12%	30 May →
ancient	7–13	-0.07	17%	24 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	13%	23 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	8%	22 May →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	8%	22 May →
anubis	13–5	-0.01	10%	22 May →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	17%	22 May →
anubis	13–2	0.02	18%	22 May →
ancient	8–13	0.01	10%	22 May →
overpass	13–6	0.02	15%	22 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	16%	22 May →
anubis	19–15	-0.04	8%	18 May →