B0RG✪

B0RG✪ — CS2 Stats

DK76561198042146972[U:1:81881244]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

502Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
985Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,377 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 502 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,974 -400 30 Mar – 23 Apr · 6 days played
15,93916,374peak 16,37430 Mar23 Apr
16,374Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,377Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-03-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,377
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 154 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-10-22
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-10-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 22 Oct 2026 and 27 Oct 2026.

Measured 22 Oct 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate44.6%46.8%48.2%3.6% short
Shot accuracy18.3%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.061.070.09 short
Match win rate44.4%46.3%46.9%2.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGB0RG✪FACEITLevel 8 · 1,377 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,377csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning49
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateTWWWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +64ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility5.5
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time596ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–10 · ancient, 19 Apr →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 7–9 · vertigo, 15 Apr →
422msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · mirage, 29 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · overpass, 11 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2314–961%0.02
anubisB209–1145%0.00
infernoS1812–667%-0.01
overpassC146–843%0.01
nukeC125–742%-0.00
mirageS75–271%0.01
dust2D51–420%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,522Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
2,521Matches
44.4%Match win rate
44.6%Headshot %
18.3%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 8 players
7,026MVPs
985Hours (in match)
2,447Bombs planted
496Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,219
AWP6,636
AUG1,623
SG 5531,061
Knife1,056
SSG 081,013

Lifetime map wins

3,890inferno
2,093dust2
1,638nuke
1,303train
958vertigo
317lake
202cbble
29safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

784Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
79.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6554%1.0315.0
Ancient6354%1.1817.3
Anubis5951%1.1717.2
Overpass4042%1.1015.5
Nuke4058%0.9813.9
Mirage4038%1.1816.8
Vertigo1593%1.8318.5
Dust21457%1.0115.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
69.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
585msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
42.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
7.37HE damage / grenade
8.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.8477% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–120.0123%29 Sept →
mirage7–1-0.0120%29 Sept →
inferno13–40.0822%6 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0228%6 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.004%27 Apr →
overpass13–10-0.0015%27 Apr →
nuke3–13-0.0426%23 Apr →
overpass6–13-0.0519%21 Apr →
inferno9–7-0.0633%21 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0320%20 Apr →
nuke7–130.0236%20 Apr →
inferno13–40.0418%20 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0230%19 Apr →
ancient13–100.1530%19 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.034%19 Apr →
anubis13–60.006%19 Apr →
overpass13–11-0.0126%16 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.0323%16 Apr →
ancient0–11-0.0513%16 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0024%16 Apr →
ancient13–40.0812%16 Apr →
vertigo7–9-0.0740%15 Apr →
anubis13–7-0.0615%14 Apr →
nuke13–80.1122%14 Apr →
inferno13–110.0514%14 Apr →
ancient12–16-0.038%13 Apr →
overpass16–140.048%13 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0522%13 Apr →
ancient13–50.0321%13 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0217%12 Apr →
inferno11–130.0117%11 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.0317%11 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0315%11 Apr →
overpass11–130.0219%11 Apr →
overpass13–30.079%11 Apr →
anubis4–130.0124%11 Apr →
ancient13–90.0223%11 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0315%11 Apr →
ancient28–260.0118%10 Apr →
overpass13–100.029%10 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0532%10 Apr →
mirage16–120.0419%10 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0315%10 Apr →
nuke13–70.0814%9 Apr →
anubis13–90.0524%9 Apr →
ancient5–130.0429%9 Apr →
ancient13–100.0526%8 Apr →
anubis11–130.0121%8 Apr →
inferno13–100.0020%8 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0313%8 Apr →
ancient13–90.0222%7 Apr →
anubis14–16-0.0115%7 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.044%7 Apr →
inferno13–90.018%6 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0329%6 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0128%6 Apr →
dust213–90.0213%6 Apr →
nuke13–3-0.0418%6 Apr →
anubis13–100.0719%6 Apr →
inferno13–50.0224%6 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0214%5 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0115%5 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.049%5 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0512%5 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.096%5 Apr →
anubis11–130.0112%5 Apr →
ancient13–160.0414%5 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.079%4 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0020%4 Apr →
anubis11–130.0320%4 Apr →
inferno13–40.0511%4 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0413%3 Apr →
anubis13–160.0313%3 Apr →
mirage13–30.1019%3 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0320%3 Apr →
overpass6–130.0017%3 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0810%2 Apr →
ancient13–70.1216%2 Apr →
anubis4–130.0510%1 Apr →
anubis13–80.029%1 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0222%1 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0819%1 Apr →
overpass7–130.0422%1 Apr →
anubis17–190.0614%1 Apr →
mirage13–90.0415%1 Apr →
mirage13–30.0521%1 Apr →
nuke11–130.0121%1 Apr →
ancient7–3-0.028%1 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0315%31 Mar →
ancient13–110.0727%31 Mar →
inferno13–7-0.049%31 Mar →
overpass13–90.0321%30 Mar →
inferno13–110.0120%30 Mar →
dust212–12-0.0114%30 Mar →
nuke13–7-0.0218%30 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0840%30 Mar →
overpass7–130.0725%30 Mar →
ancient13–100.0315%30 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.0228%30 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0324%30 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.