m0oNbOii

m0oNbOii — CS2 Stats

IS76561198040146976[U:1:79881248]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,648Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,057Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,468Top 50% of 208,731 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#91751 of 255835 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,500 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,468 +886 15 Jul – 9 Oct · 38 days played
18,58221,593peak 21,59315 Jul9 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,500 +0 1 Sept – 17 Sept · 2 observations
1,5001,500peak 1,5001 Sept17 Sept
21,707Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,500Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-07-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,500
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 31 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,125 below peak (21,593)
  • -747 over 30 days · declining
  • +886 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 532 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches12——
Win rate42%——
K/D0.91——
Headshot %48%——

Measured 17 Sep 2026 → 21 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate37.1%45.7%46.8%9.7% short
Shot accuracy14.6%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.141.051.06above
Match win rate44.3%45.7%46.3%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGm0oNbOiiFACEITLevel 7 · 1,500 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,468 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,500csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning48
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54–45–1Last 10054%Win rateWLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · +80ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch0.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time537ms−91ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 27 Aug →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · nuke, 18 Jul →
320msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 26 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 18dust2Weakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2411–1346%0.01
cacheS2013–765%0.01
mirageA1912–763%-0.00
infernoS1814–478%0.02
dust2D91–811%-0.03
anubisC83–538%0.01
ancient—20–20%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

224,182Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
9,094Matches
44.3%Match win rate
37.1%Headshot %
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
23,799MVPs
3,460Hours (in match)
6,829Bombs planted
1,665Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4747,805
AWP38,957
SSG 0834,774
P2505,952
Tec-94,806
FAMAS4,169

Lifetime map wins

16,801dust2
10,367inferno
9,518nuke
2,842vertigo
1,668office
1,424train
1,203cbble
292dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

280Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
81.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1675%1.0214.9
Dust2825%0.9015.0
Anubis850%0.9619.0
Inferno743%1.1216.9
Ancient633%0.9217.2
Nuke540%1.0117.0
Vertigo425%0.7114.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
548msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
11.6%Flash assists
9.62HE damage / grenade
4.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4228 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9662% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–5-0.0216%19 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0120%18 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0519%18 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0025%13 Oct →
nuke13–110.0318%9 Oct →
nuke11–130.0427%29 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0129%25 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0916%25 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0025%9 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0533%8 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0422%7 Sept →
mirage13–50.0115%6 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0118%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0220%5 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0520%5 Sept →
nuke13–100.0113%3 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0127%29 Aug →
nuke10–130.0511%29 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0119%28 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0019%28 Aug →
inferno13–90.0017%28 Aug →
cache7–130.0430%27 Aug →
nuke9–10.189%27 Aug →
mirage13–60.0532%25 Aug →
cache13–110.0225%25 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0433%23 Aug →
inferno13–0-0.0130%23 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0633%19 Aug →
anubis15–150.0312%19 Aug →
cache13–40.0843%19 Aug →
dust213–110.0532%18 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0422%18 Aug →
dust27–13-0.054%15 Aug →
inferno9–60.1029%14 Aug →
cache13–50.0417%14 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0328%14 Aug →
nuke13–50.0012%13 Aug →
inferno9–130.0223%13 Aug →
inferno13–100.0321%9 Aug →
mirage13–110.0414%9 Aug →
anubis11–130.0219%5 Aug →
inferno13–50.0436%5 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0715%5 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0527%5 Aug →
inferno3–1-0.010%5 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0313%5 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0115%3 Aug →
anubis4–130.0225%30 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0813%30 Jul →
mirage13–60.0233%29 Jul →
nuke13–90.0323%29 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.0222%29 Jul →
inferno13–90.1129%29 Jul →
anubis16–14-0.0025%28 Jul →
nuke13–80.0226%28 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0115%27 Jul →
anubis13–70.0231%26 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0329%26 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0114%26 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0215%25 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0311%24 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0333%24 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0642%23 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0117%23 Jul →
cache13–90.0119%23 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0010%23 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.028%23 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.016%22 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0122%22 Jul →
cache13–50.0314%21 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0629%21 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0215%21 Jul →
cache9–130.0319%21 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0117%19 Jul →
mirage9–130.0118%19 Jul →
nuke13–30.1023%19 Jul →
nuke10–130.0826%19 Jul →
mirage13–50.0120%19 Jul →
cache13–90.0022%19 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0428%19 Jul →
inferno13–20.0715%18 Jul →
nuke2–130.0253%18 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0418%18 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0228%18 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0826%18 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0118%16 Jul →
nuke13–70.0220%15 Jul →
mirage9–130.017%15 Jul →
cache13–20.0222%15 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.043%13 Jul →
inferno13–10.0513%13 Jul →
anubis13–80.0212%11 Jul →
cache13–110.0622%11 Jul →
nuke8–130.0418%10 Jul →
cache13–10.0647%10 Jul →
inferno16–120.0716%10 Jul →
nuke13–60.0516%10 Jul →
anubis10–130.0126%10 Jul →
mirage13–30.0231%10 Jul →
inferno11–130.0823%10 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.