Lazoreq

Lazoreq — CS2 Stats

76561198039577037[U:1:79311309]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

254Tracked matches55%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,514Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,850Purple band · top ~25% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,850 +3,524 7 Jun – 22 Oct · 33 days played
11,44416,513peak 16,5137 Jun22 Oct
16,807Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2026-06-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 663 below peak (16,513)
  • -523 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,283 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,150 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.4%43.8%44.8%3.4% short
Shot accuracy14.6%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.021.03meets
Match win rate42.6%44.7%45.2%2.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLazoreqFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,850 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning63
Utility12

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateLLLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility1.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.3
Utility1.2
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time600ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 18 Jun →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · mirage, 15 Aug →
469msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 7 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 6 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 40% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3012–1840%-0.00
mirageA2615–1158%0.03
cacheB1910–953%0.02
nukeC94–544%-0.02
ancientS64–267%0.05
anubis—42–250%0.02
inferno—31–233%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.04
office—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,878Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,344Matches
42.6%Match win rate
41.4%Headshot %
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
6,782MVPs
1,037Hours (in match)
1,431Bombs planted
551Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,280dust2
2,045nuke
1,966inferno
583train
237cbble
118vertigo
54assault
33lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches
45%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
105.5ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis333%1.2421.7
Dust22100%1.5825.5
Mirage250%1.1717.0
Inferno1100%1.3818.0
Vertigo10%0.8016.0
Ancient10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
594msReaction time
49.7%T opening success
57.4%CT opening success
0.22Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.45HE damage / grenade
0.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2186 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust21–130.0217%25 Oct →
dust29–13-0.018%22 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0315%14 Oct →
cache13–40.1123%14 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0936%7 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0314%7 Oct →
ancient13–30.0818%5 Oct →
inferno16–120.0212%5 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0320%5 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0822%1 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0217%1 Oct →
cache13–30.1426%30 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0223%30 Sept →
mirage15–150.0518%26 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0013%23 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0117%23 Sept →
mirage13–60.0019%14 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0122%14 Sept →
anubis5–130.0513%12 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0117%12 Sept →
cache13–30.0318%12 Sept →
nuke13–50.0613%9 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0519%9 Sept →
cache9–130.0927%9 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0313%9 Sept →
dust213–70.0318%9 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0522%8 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0014%7 Sept →
cache9–130.0229%7 Sept →
mirage13–70.0934%6 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0119%6 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0019%6 Sept →
nuke13–90.0120%6 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0128%5 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0322%3 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0513%23 Aug →
mirage13–40.1034%16 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0220%15 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0436%15 Aug →
cache13–70.0014%15 Aug →
cache13–20.0820%14 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0011%13 Aug →
cache8–13-0.1013%12 Aug →
dust215–150.0125%12 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0216%11 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0210%11 Aug →
mirage13–40.0420%11 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0220%11 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0616%11 Aug →
dust213–90.0320%11 Aug →
dust211–00.0625%11 Aug →
ancient13–60.0914%10 Aug →
dust215–150.0111%10 Aug →
mirage10–130.0516%10 Aug →
dust213–4-0.027%10 Aug →
nuke6–130.0331%9 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0418%8 Aug →
mirage13–80.0115%8 Aug →
cache13–90.0226%8 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0120%8 Aug →
nuke2–9-0.220%8 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0217%6 Aug →
mirage10–20.0431%6 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0126%4 Aug →
mirage13–80.0311%3 Aug →
mirage13–60.0219%3 Aug →
mirage13–90.0918%3 Aug →
inferno7–130.0126%1 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0123%1 Aug →
dust213–50.0425%1 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0515%1 Aug →
anubis13–90.0722%1 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0620%1 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0718%31 Jul →
cache9–130.0015%29 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0223%27 Jul →
mirage13–50.0319%27 Jul →
dust215–150.1327%27 Jul →
cache8–130.0331%22 Jul →
mirage9–130.0018%18 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0221%18 Jul →
dust213–90.0115%17 Jul →
dust213–80.0525%12 Jul →
ancient13–10.1430%6 Jul →
nuke13–90.0217%5 Jul →
dust213–80.0716%4 Jul →
cache13–1-0.0019%4 Jul →
mirage8–130.0723%3 Jul →
mirage8–130.019%24 Jun →
overpass13–5-0.0324%24 Jun →
vertigo13–90.0414%24 Jun →
cache9–130.0429%24 Jun →
mirage13–80.1921%18 Jun →
dust26–130.0516%18 Jun →
ancient2–130.0411%18 Jun →
office8–130.0016%9 Jun →
mirage12–120.0822%9 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0119%9 Jun →
cache13–20.0136%9 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0614%7 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.