Goobert

Goobert — CS2 Stats

FI76561198039110083[U:1:78844355]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

851Tracked matches42%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,381Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+4Tracked matches · now 851
0.0ppWin rate · 42.3% → 42.3%

Rating over time

35Days played since 2026-03-26

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,888), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate39.4%43.7%44.8%5.4% short
Shot accuracy10.3%12.0%12.4%2.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.111.021.03above
Match win rate41.0%44.7%45.2%4.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGoobertFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning44
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–43–13Last 10044%Win rateLWWWTWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 20

  • 8–9–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim4.4
Utility4.2
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning4.4
Utility4.2
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.4

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time566ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 11–13 · vertigo, 9 Apr →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · poseidon, 7 Apr →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · train, 25 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 26 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2814–1450%0.01
nukeC145–936%-0.00
dust2B115–645%0.01
mirageD113–827%-0.01
vertigoB105–550%0.03
anubisS64–267%-0.00
ancientA53–260%0.02
inferno—40–40%-0.04
poseidon—41–325%-0.05
overpass—22–0100%0.03
office—21–150%0.07
train—11–0100%-0.00
warden—10–10%0.04
sanctum—10–10%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

53,103Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,998Matches
41.0%Match win rate
39.4%Headshot %
10.3%Shot accuracy
6,769MVPs
807Hours (in match)
1,997Bombs planted
380Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,241inferno
2,811dust2
2,199nuke
1,070vertigo
650train
233lake
231office
186safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
50%Win rate
1.49Avg K/D
87.1ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1100%1.0014.0
Ancient10%0.539.0
Dust21100%3.5021.0
Mirage10%0.9211.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.6%Headshot accuracy
29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
67.2%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
568msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
10.46HE damage / grenade
4.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.6321% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7264% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0114%1 Oct →
cache13–90.0510%30 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0617%17 Sept →
dust213–50.019%16 Sept →
cache12–120.0016%28 Aug →
overpass13–11-0.0210%25 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0511%25 Aug →
train13–5-0.0015%25 Aug →
cache13–100.0012%18 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0217%9 Aug →
dust213–50.0612%5 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.022%4 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.108%30 Jul →
vertigo8–130.0220%30 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0813%30 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0513%30 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0911%23 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0615%23 Jul →
ancient13–110.0218%23 Jul →
mirage12–120.0513%23 Jul →
office13–10-0.0112%20 Jul →
dust212–120.0215%30 Jun →
poseidon8–8-0.144%30 Jun →
vertigo4–9-0.034%30 Jun →
overpass13–50.0819%25 Jun →
ancient13–6-0.0213%25 Jun →
dust29–130.0018%25 Jun →
mirage11–130.0213%25 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0713%25 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0018%24 Jun →
ancient2–130.0124%23 Jun →
cache4–130.0311%23 Jun →
anubis13–50.1021%23 Jun →
cache13–60.1110%23 Jun →
anubis13–90.038%28 May →
nuke2–9-0.0721%27 May →
office7–130.1518%27 May →
vertigo12–120.095%27 May →
nuke9–130.1218%27 May →
cache6–130.0111%27 May →
mirage12–12-0.0019%27 May →
mirage13–8-0.0022%26 May →
dust213–70.0618%26 May →
vertigo13–8-0.0115%26 May →
dust213–20.1224%26 May →
vertigo13–9-0.0114%26 May →
nuke12–120.008%25 May →
nuke13–70.0319%25 May →
cache4–13-0.048%25 May →
cache13–70.1323%25 May →
cache12–12-0.017%24 May →
cache8–13-0.0229%24 May →
cache13–10-0.0314%24 May →
nuke4–9-0.085%24 May →
cache13–9-0.044%24 May →
cache6–13-0.0322%24 May →
cache13–60.0911%24 May →
cache13–11-0.0118%11 May →
cache9–13-0.0323%11 May →
cache10–13-0.018%10 May →
dust24–13-0.0511%10 May →
cache6–13-0.0524%10 May →
nuke9–30.0310%10 May →
vertigo2–9-0.0531%10 May →
cache13–100.0218%9 May →
cache13–50.1217%9 May →
cache10–13-0.0410%8 May →
cache13–50.0014%8 May →
cache13–7-0.0628%8 May →
cache13–5-0.0119%8 May →
cache12–12-0.0319%8 May →
cache8–130.0317%4 May →
cache13–90.119%4 May →
anubis3–13-0.0021%26 Apr →
nuke2–13-0.0410%26 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.055%16 Apr →
mirage12–12-0.0217%16 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0311%16 Apr →
dust29–13-0.028%14 Apr →
dust213–20.0510%14 Apr →
poseidon4–9-0.160%14 Apr →
poseidon9–60.0816%14 Apr →
nuke13–100.0113%11 Apr →
vertigo13–100.019%11 Apr →
vertigo13–50.0210%11 Apr →
vertigo13–90.0711%11 Apr →
warden5–130.0419%9 Apr →
vertigo11–130.1815%9 Apr →
nuke13–110.018%9 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0630%7 Apr →
anubis13–40.0215%7 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0415%7 Apr →
mirage13–20.0313%7 Apr →
nuke9–70.035%7 Apr →
poseidon8–80.0331%7 Apr →
mirage16–140.0514%29 Mar →
ancient13–80.0915%29 Mar →
mirage1–13-0.0323%29 Mar →
inferno12–120.0512%26 Mar →
sanctum6–90.1310%26 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.