Strandmark

Strandmark — CS2 Stats

SE76561198038816897[U:1:78551169]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,520Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 1,520
−6.7ppWin rate · 53.3% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 29 Apr 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,689 +1,788 29 Apr1 May · 5 days played
17,90120,125peak 20,12529 Apr1 May
20,393Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2024-04-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStrandmarkFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning43
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateLLLLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility2.8
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.5

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.86 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.3
Utility2.8
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time614ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · train, 18 Nov
28%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · inferno, 17 Feb
445msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 14 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 29 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 30infernoWeakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA30191163%-0.01
ancientA23131057%-0.00
infernoC2181338%-0.01
dust2A148657%-0.00
nukeC52340%-0.01
trainC52340%0.02
anubis21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
618msReaction time
19.5%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.86Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
7.86HE damage / grenade
7.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.4702% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–130.0416%14 Sept
dust24–130.0221%14 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0313%29 Aug
dust26–130.0026%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0322%2 May
dust213–5-0.0021%2 May
inferno13–10-0.0215%1 May
inferno10–130.0219%24 Feb
train6–130.0114%24 Feb
dust216–12-0.0115%24 Feb
nuke12–16-0.0524%21 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0318%20 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0119%20 Feb
mirage13–110.0413%20 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0614%20 Feb
train11–13-0.0316%20 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0413%20 Feb
ancient13–90.0321%20 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0711%20 Feb
dust213–10-0.0316%20 Feb
dust27–13-0.058%19 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0712%18 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0318%18 Feb
dust213–110.0014%18 Feb
inferno1–13-0.0528%17 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0113%17 Feb
train8–13-0.0414%9 Feb
ancient13–40.0419%9 Feb
dust210–13-0.0220%9 Feb
ancient16–120.0213%9 Feb
train13–80.027%9 Feb
mirage13–70.0218%9 Feb
ancient13–50.0420%9 Feb
ancient15–150.0215%8 Feb
mirage13–110.0615%8 Feb
inferno13–60.009%8 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0718%8 Feb
ancient11–130.0416%8 Feb
inferno13–30.0821%8 Feb
ancient13–50.0926%6 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0011%6 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0216%6 Feb
inferno15–19-0.0214%6 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0421%29 Dec
ancient13–60.0023%29 Dec
mirage13–40.0323%20 Dec
mirage6–13-0.069%12 Dec
ancient7–13-0.075%6 Dec
dust213–80.0618%6 Dec
dust216–130.0126%5 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0215%5 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0022%5 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0522%3 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0212%3 Dec
ancient16–140.0120%2 Dec
ancient13–6-0.0422%1 Dec
anubis3–13-0.0523%30 Nov
inferno5–13-0.0617%29 Nov
dust27–13-0.0613%26 Nov
mirage13–110.0222%26 Nov
inferno13–160.0117%25 Nov
mirage13–110.0618%25 Nov
ancient11–130.0014%21 Nov
nuke9–130.0317%20 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0416%20 Nov
inferno13–60.0714%19 Nov
train13–60.1517%18 Nov
mirage16–130.0414%18 Nov
ancient4–13-0.1018%15 Nov
inferno13–8-0.039%15 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0515%9 Nov
ancient13–70.0112%9 Nov
inferno11–130.0221%9 Nov
inferno5–13-0.0424%8 Nov
ancient13–70.0717%7 Nov
inferno12–16-0.0119%5 Nov
ancient13–30.0617%3 Nov
mirage13–110.0514%3 Nov
ancient9–13-0.0811%3 Nov
nuke13–40.0024%2 Nov
mirage16–130.0114%1 Nov
inferno3–13-0.0811%1 Nov
ancient10–13-0.0413%1 Nov
inferno9–130.0016%1 Nov
mirage13–10-0.0310%27 Oct
mirage13–3-0.0413%27 Oct
mirage6–13-0.0310%27 Oct
mirage7–13-0.0226%26 Oct
inferno13–11-0.0420%25 Oct
anubis13–11-0.0221%25 Oct
mirage13–100.0116%24 Oct
dust213–80.0119%23 Oct
dust29–13-0.0322%19 Oct
mirage13–9-0.0515%18 Oct
mirage19–17-0.0216%2 May
dust213–70.0511%29 Apr
mirage13–20.0627%29 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0219%29 Apr
inferno0–13-0.0818%29 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0020%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →