Ralf

Ralf — CS2 Stats

76561197982186914[U:1:21921186]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,053Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating24,549Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24989 of 230988 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,893 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,549 → 24,549
0Faceit ELO · 1,893 → 1,893
+20Tracked matches · now 4,053
−3.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 30 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,549 -2,699 30 Jun14 Sept · 21 days played
20,44327,896peak 27,89630 Jun14 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,893 +0 4 Sept14 Sept · 2 observations
1,8931,893peak 1,8934 Sept14 Sept
28,068Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,893Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-06-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,893
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 108 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,347 below peak (27,896)
  • +587 over 30 days · improving
  • -2,699 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 451 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRalfFACEITLevel 9 · 1,893 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,549 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,893csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning70
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58411Last 10058%Win rateLWWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +74ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility7.2
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 48% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.0
Utility7.2
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time550ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−4.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 10 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–1 · mirage, 4 Sept
430msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 10 Jul
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 28anubisWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2819968%0.03
dust2B20101050%0.02
mirageB147750%0.02
ancientB137654%0.07
cacheS128467%0.06
anubisC73443%0.03
nukeS64267%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,722Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
79.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24552%1.2917.4
Ancient23951%1.2116.5
Inferno20352%1.2217.2
Anubis16649%1.0215.4
Dust210133%1.1617.4
Nuke4844%1.1316.8
Train4452%1.1216.2
Overpass2972%1.4820.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
551msReaction time
64.3%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
10.2%Flash assists
11.85HE damage / grenade
16.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno21–250.0423%19 Sept
cache13–40.0514%18 Sept
inferno13–100.0619%18 Sept
mirage13–90.1012%18 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0019%18 Sept
anubis5–130.0315%18 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0125%15 Sept
nuke11–130.0025%15 Sept
mirage10–130.0019%14 Sept
ancient9–130.0823%14 Sept
mirage5–30.0322%14 Sept
inferno4–00.000%14 Sept
inferno13–110.0819%13 Sept
ancient16–140.1419%13 Sept
inferno11–130.0329%12 Sept
cache13–160.0321%12 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0421%11 Sept
dust213–9-0.0232%10 Sept
anubis16–120.0114%10 Sept
mirage13–100.047%10 Sept
cache13–30.1323%10 Sept
inferno11–130.1014%10 Sept
cache13–70.0614%5 Sept
inferno13–10.0713%5 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0217%5 Sept
mirage14–160.0517%5 Sept
dust29–130.0523%5 Sept
ancient13–110.0616%5 Sept
dust213–70.0723%5 Sept
anubis3–130.0117%5 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0220%5 Sept
ancient4–130.0630%4 Sept
dust25–13-0.0317%4 Sept
mirage2–1-0.0150%4 Sept
cache8–130.0021%2 Sept
inferno16–140.0314%30 Aug
anubis22–200.0528%30 Aug
cache16–120.0514%30 Aug
mirage13–70.0312%29 Aug
dust214–16-0.0419%25 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0024%22 Aug
anubis11–130.0416%21 Aug
inferno16–140.0115%21 Aug
dust210–13-0.0312%21 Aug
ancient15–150.0217%18 Aug
cache13–110.1225%18 Aug
anubis13–70.1010%18 Aug
mirage8–130.0923%17 Aug
inferno16–130.1525%17 Aug
inferno13–90.0819%11 Aug
inferno6–130.0218%11 Aug
inferno13–100.0212%9 Aug
dust213–90.0423%9 Aug
dust23–13-0.0950%9 Aug
dust213–40.1426%9 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0313%9 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0030%9 Aug
inferno13–10.0720%7 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0325%7 Aug
dust213–110.1019%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0021%30 Jul
dust213–60.0425%30 Jul
dust29–130.0321%28 Jul
mirage16–130.0420%22 Jul
ancient16–130.0413%22 Jul
nuke13–70.0320%20 Jul
cache6–130.0314%19 Jul
ancient13–30.0518%19 Jul
inferno13–100.0122%19 Jul
dust213–100.0322%19 Jul
nuke13–90.0613%19 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0122%18 Jul
cache13–70.0719%18 Jul
dust210–130.0223%18 Jul
inferno9–130.0124%18 Jul
inferno13–80.0823%17 Jul
dust213–80.0119%17 Jul
ancient10–130.1226%16 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0233%16 Jul
cache13–60.0419%16 Jul
cache8–130.0327%12 Jul
mirage9–130.0022%12 Jul
ancient13–70.0716%12 Jul
cache13–40.1331%11 Jul
ancient5–130.0341%10 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0224%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0330%10 Jul
inferno10–130.0116%10 Jul
ancient13–10.1634%10 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0217%10 Jul
dust213–60.0218%7 Jul
ancient11–130.0512%6 Jul
dust25–130.0223%5 Jul
inferno13–40.0630%5 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0514%3 Jul
inferno13–100.0534%3 Jul
dust213–70.0833%3 Jul
inferno13–30.0320%1 Jul
inferno11–130.0223%1 Jul
dust24–13-0.0331%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →