High_Eye

High_Eye — CS2 Stats

AT76561198037457337[U:1:77191609]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,366Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,974Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating12,608Blue band · top ~41.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,608 +2,828 23 Jul – 7 Oct · 26 days played
9,24913,100peak 13,10023 Jul7 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,270 +0 12 Sept – 14 Sept · 2 observations
1,2701,270peak 1,27012 Sept14 Sept
13,100Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,270Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-07-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 492 below peak (13,100)
  • +175 over 30 days · steady
  • +2,828 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,392 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate33.5%43.8%44.8%11.3% short
Shot accuracy13.5%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.021.030.05 short
Match win rate43.6%44.7%45.2%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHigh_EyeFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,608 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,270csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning53
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.3
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time619ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 20 Aug →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 2–4 · cache, 26 Jul →
469msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · mirage, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 27 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2314–961%0.00
mirageC187–1139%0.01
infernoA1810–856%-0.01
anubisC114–736%0.01
cacheS118–373%0.03
nukeS96–367%-0.02
ancientB84–450%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%0.01
italy—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,529Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
4,008Matches
43.6%Match win rate
33.5%Headshot %
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,283MVPs
1,630Hours (in match)
3,234Bombs planted
808Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP18,392
AK-4713,175
MP72,293
P2501,662
P901,518
Tec-91,439

Lifetime map wins

14,406dust2
5,631inferno
860cbble
762nuke
708vertigo
439train
237office
124italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
60%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
68.5ADR
28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1464%1.2014.3
Anubis1050%0.8313.8
Dust2875%0.8111.6
Mirage875%1.4417.8
Cache729%0.779.7
Nuke250%1.2013.0
Ancient250%0.8514.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
607msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
50.0%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
11.28HE damage / grenade
8.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.0943% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0018%7 Oct →
nuke13–80.0414%7 Oct →
anubis13–50.0612%7 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0514%30 Sept →
cache16–130.0416%30 Sept →
mirage13–70.0511%30 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0415%30 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0413%23 Sept →
inferno15–150.0222%23 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0316%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0319%23 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0111%20 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0311%20 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.057%15 Sept →
inferno13–80.0518%11 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0125%11 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0114%9 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0520%4 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.1217%1 Sept →
inferno13–100.0011%31 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0014%31 Aug →
mirage15–150.0313%31 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0321%31 Aug →
cache13–90.0614%31 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0315%31 Aug →
dust213–30.0711%29 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0113%29 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0111%28 Aug →
inferno13–80.0318%28 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0524%28 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0017%28 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0118%28 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0518%28 Aug →
dust213–100.0715%28 Aug →
dust213–10.0832%27 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0710%27 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0624%27 Aug →
ancient11–130.0227%26 Aug →
dust213–30.0922%26 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0415%25 Aug →
anubis11–130.0722%25 Aug →
dust213–10-0.063%24 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0313%20 Aug →
inferno13–90.0426%20 Aug →
nuke13–50.0014%20 Aug →
mirage13–40.1110%20 Aug →
inferno13–30.0518%20 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0621%11 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0317%11 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0317%11 Aug →
anubis13–80.0423%9 Aug →
mirage13–90.0221%9 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0315%31 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0128%31 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0619%31 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0224%31 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0118%29 Jul →
inferno13–50.0115%29 Jul →
mirage13–60.0616%29 Jul →
mirage11–130.0515%29 Jul →
dust213–90.0623%29 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0120%28 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0517%28 Jul →
cache13–20.0518%28 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0214%28 Jul →
cache13–60.0614%28 Jul →
nuke11–130.0712%28 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0224%26 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.049%26 Jul →
inferno13–10.0138%26 Jul →
cache13–80.0216%26 Jul →
dust213–70.0416%26 Jul →
cache2–4-0.0145%26 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0314%26 Jul →
ancient13–50.0419%26 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0120%24 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0119%24 Jul →
anubis7–130.0316%24 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0316%24 Jul →
cache13–30.0010%23 Jul →
dust213–80.0238%23 Jul →
italy3–130.0211%23 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0322%23 Jul →
inferno10–130.0224%23 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0312%23 Jul →
anubis13–110.0113%23 Jul →
mirage13–40.0120%23 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0421%22 Jul →
dust213–3-0.108%22 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0313%22 Jul →
cache13–100.0223%21 Jul →
dust213–80.0417%21 Jul →
nuke13–2-0.0912%21 Jul →
mirage10–130.0411%21 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0325%20 Jul →
cache8–130.0516%20 Jul →
mirage11–130.0413%20 Jul →
nuke13–20.0514%20 Jul →
cache13–50.0211%19 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0113%19 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.