nallen darrapäivä

nallen darrapäivä — CS2 Stats

76561198035549220[U:1:75283492]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,025Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,350Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62924 of 251476 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,553 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,350 +1,673 13 Sept – 10 Oct · 7 days played
19,67721,350peak 21,35013 Sept10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,553 +0 4 Sept – 18 Sept · 3 observations
1,5531,553peak 1,5534 Sept18 Sept
21,350Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,553Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-07-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,553
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 198 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,350
  • +1,673 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,650 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnallen darrapäiväFACEITLevel 8 · 1,553 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,350 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,553csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning57
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWLWWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility3.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.7
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels8.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time565ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 30 Sept →
26%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 21 Jul →
344msFastest reaction time · 19–15 · ancient, 19 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
4–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 39% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2811–1739%-0.02
ancientB2312–1152%-0.02
infernoB199–1047%-0.02
anubisA149–564%0.00
cacheA127–558%-0.01
nuke—31–233%-0.05
dust2—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 28). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,682Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
72.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15752%0.9013.5
Ancient11656%0.8514.1
Inferno10547%0.8913.4
Anubis9853%0.9114.5
Overpass2556%0.9914.8
Dust22544%0.9713.5
Cache1547%0.9513.1
Nuke1040%0.8412.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
567msReaction time
70.1%T opening success
60.9%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
5.97HE damage / grenade
6.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2911% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4514 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–7-0.094%10 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.149%10 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0214%3 Oct →
mirage13–60.0812%3 Oct →
anubis13–90.059%3 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0120%30 Sept →
mirage13–100.0322%30 Sept →
ancient13–70.1012%30 Sept →
mirage10–130.018%29 Sept →
cache13–110.0121%29 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.048%26 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0523%26 Sept →
anubis13–100.0213%26 Sept →
dust28–13-0.028%26 Sept →
mirage13–100.0023%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.0214%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0513%25 Sept →
anubis13–90.017%25 Sept →
cache13–10.019%25 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0014%22 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0318%22 Sept →
ancient13–110.0119%22 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0321%20 Sept →
cache13–110.0116%20 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0115%20 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0111%20 Sept →
ancient19–150.0216%19 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.009%19 Sept →
mirage13–70.0713%19 Sept →
mirage19–160.0117%15 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0116%15 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0319%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.0221%14 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0510%14 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0320%13 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0123%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.017%11 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0716%11 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0713%11 Sept →
ancient13–70.0222%6 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0710%6 Sept →
inferno19–150.017%6 Sept →
anubis17–19-0.0218%4 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.099%4 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0023%4 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0315%2 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0110%2 Sept →
anubis9–130.0418%2 Sept →
inferno8–130.0220%1 Sept →
ancient14–160.0013%1 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0617%31 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0618%31 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.079%31 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0310%31 Aug →
anubis9–130.0021%30 Aug →
inferno13–50.036%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0211%30 Aug →
mirage10–130.0413%26 Aug →
inferno13–90.0522%26 Aug →
anubis13–80.0422%24 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0110%24 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0710%24 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0413%14 Aug →
anubis13–20.0714%10 Aug →
ancient13–100.0124%10 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0513%10 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0218%8 Aug →
inferno13–30.034%8 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0814%8 Aug →
ancient11–130.0217%6 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.024%6 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.069%5 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0622%5 Aug →
cache14–16-0.078%5 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0411%3 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0212%3 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0411%2 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.018%2 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0320%2 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0216%27 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0618%27 Jul →
mirage3–130.0326%21 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.049%21 Jul →
cache13–80.0710%21 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0114%20 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0722%20 Jul →
ancient13–100.0214%20 Jul →
cache13–70.0213%14 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0218%14 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.017%13 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.078%13 Jul →
inferno16–12-0.0314%12 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.025%12 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.025%12 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.106%8 Jul →
ancient11–130.0213%8 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0814%8 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.067%8 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0210%7 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0116%7 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.