Klemmp

Klemmp — CS2 Stats

76561198034973477[U:1:74707749]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

217Tracked matches72%Win rate2022Tracked since
260Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,304), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate42.7%50.9%
Shot accuracy10.1%13.8%
Kill/death ratio1.091.09
Match win rate55.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKlemmpFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning68
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–39–1Last 10060%Win rateTLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility2.6
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch6.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.8
Utility2.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time557ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 3 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 16–13 · dust2, 15 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 2 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 2 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
21Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2715–1256%0.02
infernoB2110–1148%0.01
anubisS1713–476%0.01
mirageC114–736%-0.01
vertigoS86–275%0.01
dust2S64–267%0.06
overpassS65–183%0.07
nuke—43–175%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,748Lifetime kills
1.09K/D
488Matches
55.7%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 10 players
42.7%Headshot %
10.1%Shot accuracy
1,328MVPs
260Hours (in match)
886Bombs planted
237Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

972inferno
503train
468cbble
301dust2
198nuke
182vertigo
16office
11assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

394Matches
56%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
88.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3456%1.2218.4
Inferno2646%1.2616.9
Anubis2658%1.1416.6
Mirage1631%0.8213.2
Vertigo1275%0.9816.8
Overpass1070%1.6815.3
Dust2956%1.4719.0
Nuke850%1.3417.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
541msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
49.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
10.03HE damage / grenade
10.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7926% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–150.0918%3 Sept →
dust28–130.0523%3 Sept →
mirage5–130.0826%18 Oct →
inferno13–60.0916%19 Nov →
ancient16–140.0022%19 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0320%5 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0312%5 Nov →
anubis16–140.0916%29 Oct →
ancient13–30.0518%29 Oct →
inferno13–100.0529%15 Oct →
dust216–130.0945%15 Oct →
inferno16–120.0820%1 Oct →
dust213–40.0817%1 Oct →
inferno13–70.0537%17 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0132%17 Sept →
dust213–110.0310%10 Sept →
ancient19–150.1120%10 Sept →
dust213–70.1426%3 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0621%3 Sept →
ancient15–190.0818%3 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0119%2 Jul →
anubis13–100.0521%2 Jul →
ancient13–70.0329%2 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0729%16 Jun →
vertigo13–40.0515%16 Jun →
vertigo13–110.0223%6 Jun →
ancient13–110.0227%4 Jun →
anubis13–70.004%4 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0811%29 May →
anubis16–130.0524%28 May →
mirage10–13-0.0135%28 May →
nuke13–70.0427%25 May →
inferno11–130.0526%22 May →
anubis16–13-0.0310%21 May →
vertigo13–110.0711%20 May →
anubis8–13-0.0411%20 May →
inferno10–13-0.0414%17 May →
mirage13–7-0.0315%17 May →
inferno11–130.0015%13 May →
anubis11–13-0.0718%13 May →
mirage13–60.0115%13 May →
anubis13–6-0.039%29 Apr →
anubis13–50.0036%26 Apr →
vertigo13–11-0.0118%26 Apr →
mirage13–40.0911%25 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0120%23 Apr →
anubis16–120.0717%23 Apr →
anubis13–90.0322%5 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0413%1 Apr →
ancient4–130.0724%19 Mar →
nuke2–0-0.080%12 Mar →
inferno13–110.0524%9 Mar →
inferno13–16-0.0333%9 Mar →
ancient10–130.0720%9 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0311%9 Mar →
ancient13–110.0020%5 Mar →
anubis13–80.0615%5 Mar →
ancient13–60.0514%5 Mar →
anubis13–40.0922%27 Feb →
inferno13–30.0518%27 Feb →
overpass13–5-0.007%27 Feb →
overpass7–20.0823%25 Feb →
nuke16–120.1029%25 Feb →
overpass13–40.1124%21 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0413%21 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0223%20 Feb →
inferno13–80.0123%20 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0717%20 Feb →
ancient13–160.0223%15 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0726%15 Feb →
overpass11–130.0726%13 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0027%13 Feb →
ancient13–60.0318%13 Feb →
vertigo10–13-0.0314%11 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0018%10 Feb →
ancient13–60.0610%6 Feb →
inferno13–80.088%6 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0918%6 Feb →
inferno13–90.0615%4 Feb →
inferno3–13-0.0520%4 Feb →
overpass13–80.0629%4 Feb →
vertigo19–16-0.0311%3 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0119%1 Feb →
ancient7–130.0044%1 Feb →
ancient19–160.0027%30 Jan →
ancient13–16-0.0221%30 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0329%30 Jan →
vertigo12–16-0.0015%29 Jan →
anubis13–5-0.0819%29 Jan →
mirage16–120.0429%23 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0717%23 Jan →
inferno13–16-0.0217%16 Jan →
anubis13–40.0615%16 Jan →
ancient13–50.0717%16 Jan →
inferno13–100.0019%9 Jan →
ancient10–130.0328%9 Jan →
anubis14–160.0416%2 Jan →
overpass13–20.0924%2 Jan →
ancient16–13-0.0313%2 Jan →
vertigo13–11-0.0324%18 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10100 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.