XNTON

XNTON — CS2 Stats

UG76561198034800208[U:1:74534480]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,840Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,081Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating12,531Blue band · top ~41.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 12,531 → 12,531
+6Tracked matches · now 1,840
+10.3ppWin rate · 44.8% → 55.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 7 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,531 -2,468 8 Feb15 Sept · 23 days played
12,53115,101peak 15,1018 Feb15 Sept
15,390Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,721Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-02-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,570 below peak (15,101)
  • -905 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,469 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches62+4
Win rate67%0%+67pp
K/D0.790.68+0.10
Headshot %63%86%−22pp

Measured 15 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; previous 10 Sep 2026 → 15 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate63.6%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy19.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.281.061.070.79 short
Match win rate36.4%46.3%46.9%10.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXNTONFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER12,531 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,721csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning42
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateWWLWWWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · −185ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 682ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.6 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.1
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch8.8

Excellent counter-strafingReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.2
Utility6.1
Mechanics9.6
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time692ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 692ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 1 Aug
60%Best headshot accuracy · 0–8 · dust2, 15 May
383msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · inferno, 18 Sept
13–1Biggest win · cache, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2081240%-0.01
dust2C1881044%-0.05
infernoB179853%-0.02
anubisD124833%-0.01
ancientC104640%0.00
nukeS96367%0.00
mirageC83538%-0.03
overpass41325%-0.00
poseidon110100%0.11
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

174,950Lifetime kills
0.28K/D
7,289Matches
36.4%Match win rate
63.6%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 8 players
19.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 8 players
7,227MVPs
5,933Hours (in match)
2,744Bombs planted
960Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47104,129
AWP2,437
MP91,669
FAMAS1,572
SG 5531,367

Lifetime map wins

7,670inferno
6,462dust2
2,965nuke
1,872train
609vertigo
61lake
47cbble
20bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

471Matches
53%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
77.5ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

64%1v1 clutch win
54%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2040%1.0817.2
Inferno1963%1.0815.9
Mirage1833%1.0313.9
Anubis1747%1.2616.3
Nuke850%1.5615.4
Dust2650%1.2418.5
Overpass667%1.0113.0
Vertigo250%1.0417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.6%Spray accuracy
93.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
661msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
8.64HE damage / grenade
11.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7836% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0719%18 Sept
mirage13–80.0434%18 Sept
inferno0–13-0.1411%18 Sept
cache13–10.0714%18 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0313%18 Sept
cache13–50.0535%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0521%3 Sept
dust213–11-0.0029%3 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0023%27 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0115%27 Aug
cache13–70.0026%27 Aug
nuke9–6-0.0112%1 Aug
poseidon9–10.1129%1 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1011%1 Aug
dust29–13-0.0427%1 Aug
cache1–8-0.100%1 Aug
inferno13–4-0.068%1 Aug
cache13–20.0921%1 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0223%1 Aug
nuke8–13-0.059%1 Aug
dust24–80.0222%28 Jul
ancient13–40.0730%16 Jul
mirage13–50.0431%16 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0524%16 Jul
dust213–8-0.0123%16 Jul
inferno13–30.0733%16 Jul
cache1–13-0.0627%9 Jul
nuke13–50.0544%9 Jul
dust25–13-0.0729%9 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0520%2 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0324%2 Jul
cache9–13-0.0327%2 Jul
anubis0–20.0250%26 Jun
dust24–13-0.0719%26 Jun
cache9–130.0130%26 Jun
mirage2–9-0.0522%18 Jun
dust213–10-0.0625%18 Jun
cache8–130.0230%18 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0521%18 Jun
cache7–13-0.0631%4 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0516%29 May
dust213–9-0.0021%29 May
cache13–80.0421%29 May
anubis6–13-0.0623%29 May
dust28–13-0.1020%23 May
mirage5–13-0.0627%21 May
inferno13–6-0.0212%21 May
cache11–130.0231%21 May
cache11–13-0.0216%21 May
dust20–8-0.1160%15 May
nuke6–13-0.0722%15 May
cache12–12-0.069%15 May
cache2–7-0.1033%9 May
cache6–13-0.0319%9 May
cache13–90.0628%7 May
cache13–60.0528%7 May
cache13–10-0.0125%30 Apr
cache7–13-0.0543%30 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0123%29 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0218%29 Apr
inferno13–90.0125%29 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0720%24 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0324%23 Apr
dust213–8-0.0424%23 Apr
ancient15–15-0.049%23 Apr
dust213–40.0133%10 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0217%10 Apr
dust27–13-0.0632%2 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0720%2 Apr
inferno13–20.0519%2 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0627%2 Apr
anubis13–20.0441%27 Mar
nuke13–3-0.0023%27 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0428%27 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0036%25 Mar
nuke13–90.1026%25 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0523%25 Mar
ancient11–130.0626%25 Mar
inferno13–70.0129%25 Mar
dust215–15-0.0415%19 Mar
anubis6–130.0119%19 Mar
dust26–13-0.108%19 Mar
dust28–13-0.0432%27 Feb
anubis6–130.0532%27 Feb
overpass13–80.0424%27 Feb
inferno6–130.0130%27 Feb
anubis13–40.0425%26 Feb
inferno13–90.0030%26 Feb
dust213–9-0.1110%26 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0511%20 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0217%20 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0429%15 Feb
nuke13–40.0423%15 Feb
inferno10–130.0141%14 Feb
ancient13–40.0930%14 Feb
vertigo13–70.0517%11 Feb
anubis13–80.0225%8 Feb
nuke13–90.0425%8 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0018%8 Feb
inferno16–140.0234%7 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →