✪ FreaK

✪ FreaK — CS2 Stats

US76561198031659297[U:1:71393569]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,145Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,509Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,767Top 50% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69182 of 248328 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,767 +691 22 May – 8 Sept · 22 days played
18,17222,732peak 22,73222 May8 Sept
22,840Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-05-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,965 below peak (22,732)
  • +329 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,233 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches4——
Win rate25%——
K/D1.33——
Headshot %41%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate37.1%43.8%44.8%7.7% short
Shot accuracy17.6%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.231.021.03above
Match win rate46.6%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ FreaKFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,767 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning58
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateWLTLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–11 · inferno, 16 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · ancient, 17 Aug →
430msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 25 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 41% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2711–1641%0.02
mirageB2412–1250%0.02
cacheB178–947%0.03
ancientA1710–759%0.02
infernoA117–464%0.03
anubis—32–167%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

172,230Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
8,322Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
37.1%Headshot %
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
21,033MVPs
3,509Hours (in match)
5,541Bombs planted
1,849Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4755,254
AWP25,163
P2504,200
SSG 082,439
P902,389

Lifetime map wins

23,573dust2
16,998inferno
5,577nuke
1,037train
948cbble
798italy
439vertigo
374office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

205Matches
53%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
91.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2450%1.0816.8
Ancient3100%1.3419.0
Inferno20%0.9119.0
Mirage250%1.3013.5
Nuke10%0.7814.0
Anubis10%1.1820.0
Train1100%1.757.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
564msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
12.54HE damage / grenade
4.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2053% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.1011%8 Sept →
cache10–130.0221%8 Sept →
ancient15–150.0514%6 Sept →
cache0–13-0.067%6 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.018%1 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0422%1 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0317%1 Sept →
cache13–70.0231%1 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0124%1 Sept →
ancient13–100.0212%31 Aug →
cache13–100.0920%31 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0316%31 Aug →
inferno9–00.056%31 Aug →
dust213–00.0820%30 Aug →
cache13–80.0028%30 Aug →
ancient13–100.0525%27 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.073%27 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0117%27 Aug →
dust213–110.0112%27 Aug →
mirage8–130.0611%26 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0118%25 Aug →
cache10–130.0224%25 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0325%25 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0411%25 Aug →
dust213–40.067%22 Aug →
mirage6–130.016%22 Aug →
mirage13–110.0217%21 Aug →
dust24–130.0122%20 Aug →
inferno11–130.0125%20 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0811%20 Aug →
mirage7–130.0615%19 Aug →
mirage13–80.0220%19 Aug →
mirage5–130.0113%19 Aug →
ancient13–100.028%19 Aug →
dust25–13-0.028%18 Aug →
ancient13–160.039%18 Aug →
mirage16–130.0220%18 Aug →
anubis13–100.0214%18 Aug →
cache13–80.0316%18 Aug →
mirage13–50.0424%18 Aug →
mirage13–80.0421%17 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0416%17 Aug →
ancient2–00.0250%17 Aug →
inferno13–100.0613%17 Aug →
dust210–130.0714%17 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0417%17 Aug →
ancient16–130.0215%17 Aug →
mirage11–130.0719%16 Aug →
inferno13–110.1618%16 Aug →
ancient13–80.1017%16 Aug →
cache13–90.0118%16 Aug →
dust213–110.0718%16 Aug →
dust215–150.0220%14 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0115%14 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0417%14 Aug →
ancient13–00.014%14 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0513%13 Aug →
dust24–13-0.089%13 Aug →
cache14–160.0914%13 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0315%13 Aug →
dust213–40.1113%13 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0215%13 Aug →
dust29–130.0713%12 Aug →
mirage13–100.0516%12 Aug →
cache13–110.0822%12 Aug →
dust213–100.049%1 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0020%1 Aug →
dust28–130.0617%1 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0015%1 Aug →
inferno13–70.0820%1 Aug →
cache16–140.0814%1 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0210%1 Aug →
mirage13–110.0717%21 Jul →
mirage13–60.089%21 Jul →
dust210–130.0116%21 Jul →
cache13–110.0515%21 Jul →
dust213–80.0619%21 Jul →
dust211–130.0021%21 Jul →
ancient8–130.0116%21 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0619%20 Jul →
mirage16–120.0212%18 Jul →
ancient13–90.0818%18 Jul →
ancient12–10.0214%18 Jul →
mirage13–100.0114%18 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0325%17 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0028%17 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0216%17 Jul →
ancient15–150.1124%17 Jul →
inferno13–90.0317%17 Jul →
mirage10–130.0111%12 Jul →
mirage7–130.0711%12 Jul →
cache0–13-0.0513%10 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0715%10 Jul →
inferno13–70.1323%10 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.048%22 May →
overpass8–13-0.047%20 May →
mirage2–130.0023%20 May →
cache2–13-0.0121%20 May →
cache11–130.1124%20 May →
cache11–130.0421%20 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.