ziiffi

ziiffi — CS2 Stats

76561198031360721[U:1:71094993]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

979Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,284Purple band · top ~27.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 945 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−338Premier CS Rating · 15,622 → 15,284

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,284 -1,783 28 Aug – 4 Nov · 26 days played
15,20718,682peak 18,68228 Aug4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 945 +0 14 Sept – 4 Oct · 4 observations
945945peak 94514 Sept4 Oct
18,682Peak Premier in tracked matches
945Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 945
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 106 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,398 below peak (18,682)
  • -2,430 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,716 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGziiffiFACEITLevel 6 · 945 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,284 · Purple bandPEAK ELO945csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning65
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateLLWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.1
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 44% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.5
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time593ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy12.5%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 11.2% → last ⅓ avg 12.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 2 Nov →
26%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 23 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 0–2 · inferno, 4 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 23anubisWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2315–865%0.01
anubisC197–1237%-0.01
dust2C156–940%-0.02
ancientB137–654%-0.01
nukeA127–558%-0.01
mirageB105–550%-0.01
cacheB84–450%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

396Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
75.5ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8061%1.0414.5
Ancient7258%1.0815.9
Nuke6749%0.9514.1
Anubis5252%0.9715.5
Dust25042%1.0414.9
Mirage3749%1.0515.8
Overpass1644%1.1215.9
Cache1354%1.0113.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
590msReaction time
67.6%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
10.21HE damage / grenade
6.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1302% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0514%4 Nov →
inferno0–2-0.060%4 Nov →
dust219–16-0.0516%3 Nov →
ancient13–50.0116%3 Nov →
cache13–2-0.0116%3 Nov →
inferno13–40.108%2 Nov →
dust27–13-0.049%2 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0318%2 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0015%2 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0510%2 Nov →
dust211–130.0518%1 Nov →
anubis9–13-0.065%31 Oct →
inferno11–130.0211%31 Oct →
anubis6–130.0310%31 Oct →
ancient13–10.078%31 Oct →
dust29–13-0.016%31 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0217%31 Oct →
inferno13–70.0317%31 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0518%30 Oct →
inferno13–60.0611%30 Oct →
ancient13–40.059%29 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.057%28 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0815%26 Oct →
nuke13–110.019%26 Oct →
cache13–70.0117%26 Oct →
anubis9–130.0319%25 Oct →
nuke13–50.0214%24 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0319%24 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.052%23 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0726%23 Oct →
cache5–130.0215%23 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.018%23 Oct →
dust213–80.0213%22 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0326%22 Oct →
anubis13–100.0711%19 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.037%18 Oct →
mirage13–100.0212%1 Oct →
mirage9–130.026%29 Sept →
inferno14–160.0013%28 Sept →
anubis9–130.0113%28 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.027%26 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0414%26 Sept →
anubis13–50.044%26 Sept →
cache13–60.0114%25 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0214%25 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.067%25 Sept →
dust23–13-0.144%24 Sept →
mirage13–20.0915%23 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0417%23 Sept →
dust217–190.0113%22 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.037%21 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0413%20 Sept →
mirage12–2-0.0413%19 Sept →
nuke16–120.0315%19 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.017%19 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.037%19 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0212%18 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0715%18 Sept →
cache5–13-0.048%17 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.058%17 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0210%14 Sept →
inferno13–110.0818%14 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0010%10 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0122%10 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0310%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.058%9 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0717%8 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0417%8 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0513%8 Sept →
inferno13–50.0214%8 Sept →
inferno13–70.029%4 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.087%3 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0114%3 Sept →
anubis13–90.0013%3 Sept →
ancient9–130.0013%3 Sept →
nuke22–20-0.029%2 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0320%2 Sept →
anubis17–19-0.0011%2 Sept →
inferno13–160.0121%2 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0311%30 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.018%29 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.019%28 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.064%28 Aug →
nuke13–50.065%28 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0110%28 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.036%28 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0212%28 Aug →
inferno13–50.026%28 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0110%27 Aug →
dust213–70.008%27 Aug →
anubis9–130.0012%27 Aug →
cache13–60.0510%27 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.019%27 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0316%25 Aug →
inferno13–80.0217%25 Aug →
dust213–70.069%20 Aug →
inferno4–130.0410%20 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0316%18 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0211%18 Aug →
ancient13–80.0310%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.