reXi — CS2 Stats

76561198030087328[U:1:69821600]VAC banned

2,337Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since

4,125Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating20,355Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14899 of 40014 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,486 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	38.4%	46.1%	47.0%	8.6% short
Shot accuracy	11.7%	12.6%	12.7%	1.0% short
Kill/death ratio	1.11	1.05	1.07	above
Match win rate	43.3%	45.7%	46.4%	3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning41

Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateWLLLWWWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim7.1

Aggression4.0

Utility7.1

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.1

Clutch7.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning4.1

Utility7.1

Mechanics4.2

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time549ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms

Headshot accuracy20.2%+2.8%

first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 13–3

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 17nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	23	12–11	52%	-0.00
dust2	C	21	9–12	43%	0.00
inferno	C	17	6–11	35%	0.01
cache	S	17	12–5	71%	0.03
anubis	D	10	3–7	30%	0.01
nuke	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.00
ancient	—	4	2–2	50%	0.04
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,515Lifetime kills

1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players

5,948Matches

43.3%Match win rate

38.4%Headshot %

11.7%Shot accuracy

11,045MVPs

2,377Hours (in match)

6,902Bombs planted

1,425Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,982

AWP17,507

M4A4 / M4A1-S17,291

P2000 / USP-S5,913

Glock-184,402

Desert Eagle4,044

MAC-103,015

MP92,926

P902,456

Negev2,101

Lifetime map wins

14,765dust2

8,487inferno

4,282nuke

1,345vertigo

711train

333cbble

200office

95assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches

58%Win rate

1.23Avg K/D

75.4ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

55%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	32	59%	1.20	14.9
Anubis	19	58%	1.38	15.9
Inferno	17	47%	1.20	15.2
Ancient	12	42%	1.30	17.7
Vertigo	12	58%	1.13	18.3
Nuke	7	86%	1.08	14.0
Dust2	6	83%	1.34	16.2
Overpass	1	100%	0.76	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.8%Spray accuracy

69.0%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

542msReaction time

21.8%T opening success

39.2%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

8.4%Flash assists

9.20HE damage / grenade

17.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.8416% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–6	0.13	17%	29 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	22%	29 Aug →
inferno	12–16	0.00	13%	29 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.01	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	45%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.07	16%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.09	27%	24 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	25%	23 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	15%	23 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.05	17%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	12%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	27%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	35%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	10%	22 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.02	21%	22 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	30%	18 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	10%	18 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	22%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	10%	17 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.06	17%	16 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	24%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.04	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	9%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.05	20%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–2	-0.02	31%	15 Aug →
cache	12–16	0.01	27%	14 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.00	21%	14 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	17%	13 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.02	8%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	24%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.00	18%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.07	18%	10 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	24%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.08	20%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	27%	9 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	18%	9 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.03	16%	9 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.09	12%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.10	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	24%	8 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.04	24%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	20%	8 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	24%	7 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.02	32%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.15	20%	7 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	17%	7 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.05	17%	5 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	24%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.00	19%	5 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.04	15%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	32%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.08	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	20%	2 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.00	26%	1 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.07	25%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	14%	30 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.02	30%	30 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.01	17%	29 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	21%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.01	14%	29 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	7%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.03	26%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.08	23%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.07	29%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	25%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	10%	26 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	3%	26 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	50%	24 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	15%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	14%	24 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.06	19%	24 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	25%	24 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.02	15%	22 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	19%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	18%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.08	23%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	9%	19 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.08	19%	19 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.05	9%	19 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	12%	18 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	24%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	9%	18 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	16%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	13%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	19%	17 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	10%	17 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	28%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	11%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.21	25%	14 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.02	13%	13 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.00	24%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.13	15%	13 Jul →
overpass	13–4	-0.02	17%	3 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	20%	3 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.07	17%	3 Jul →