Elmo

Elmo — CS2 Stats

76561198029529054[U:1:69263326]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

373Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,195Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,877 -122 26 Feb – 30 Dec · 46 days played
14,09818,066peak 18,06626 Feb30 Dec
18,176Peak Premier in tracked matches
54Days played since 2024-02-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate40.6%41.8%42.7%2.1% short
Shot accuracy17.3%12.2%11.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.300.980.99above
Match win rate44.6%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGElmoFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning50
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateWLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility2.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.0
Utility2.0
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time605ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–5 · overpass, 7 Apr →
26%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 19 Jun →
438msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 9 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 18 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2113–862%0.01
ancientB168–850%0.00
infernoC156–940%-0.03
vertigoB147–750%0.00
nukeB115–645%-0.00
mirageB115–645%-0.03
overpassS96–367%0.04
dust2—22–0100%-0.01
mills—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,291Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 10% of Level 3 players
3,120Matches
44.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
40.6%Headshot %
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
8,842MVPs
1,195Hours (in match)
2,256Bombs planted
704Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,463inferno
3,102dust2
1,091nuke
993cbble
776train
769office
626vertigo
142aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
52%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
—ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3100%1.2817.0
Inferno2100%1.9818.5
Overpass2100%1.7210.5
Nuke10%1.0814.0
Vertigo10%0.7112.0
Mirage10%0.383.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.0%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
599msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
38.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
9.34HE damage / grenade
5.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0448% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.595% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0313%16 Mar →
nuke2–13-0.059%16 Mar →
inferno10–130.0313%13 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0324%13 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.045%11 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.046%30 Dec →
ancient6–130.0318%30 Dec →
inferno13–40.0512%29 Dec →
mirage13–5-0.0123%28 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.068%28 Dec →
inferno13–50.0421%28 Dec →
anubis13–60.018%23 Dec →
anubis13–9-0.0313%23 Dec →
ancient7–13-0.056%22 Dec →
mirage7–13-0.0614%22 Dec →
vertigo13–90.0210%15 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.084%15 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0316%3 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0225%2 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.1124%29 Sept →
anubis13–20.026%25 Sept →
vertigo13–50.029%19 Sept →
nuke13–80.0717%19 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0110%14 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.108%12 Sept →
inferno13–20.0820%1 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0014%1 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0214%28 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0210%9 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0416%9 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.1019%3 Aug →
vertigo14–16-0.0114%3 Aug →
anubis13–10.1010%18 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0724%18 Jul →
vertigo13–60.068%12 Jul →
mills13–8-0.0315%8 Jul →
vertigo11–130.0118%3 Jul →
anubis13–20.0718%19 Jun →
inferno13–8-0.0826%19 Jun →
anubis4–130.0320%5 Jun →
vertigo13–11-0.0310%5 Jun →
dust213–50.0117%5 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0411%3 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.056%3 Jun →
anubis4–130.0226%31 May →
nuke13–11-0.0413%31 May →
anubis13–70.0111%28 May →
ancient13–20.0511%28 May →
dust213–4-0.0216%28 May →
mirage15–15-0.0512%27 May →
anubis10–130.018%23 May →
ancient13–6-0.0215%23 May →
nuke13–6-0.0213%23 May →
ancient13–80.1024%19 Apr →
vertigo8–13-0.0111%15 Apr →
nuke13–50.0519%14 Apr →
vertigo13–50.1111%14 Apr →
nuke7–130.0414%12 Apr →
vertigo5–130.0117%10 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.045%7 Apr →
anubis2–13-0.0914%7 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0314%7 Apr →
overpass9–50.1619%7 Apr →
nuke6–90.0118%7 Apr →
inferno2–9-0.1513%7 Apr →
overpass13–7-0.035%7 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.0012%7 Apr →
vertigo7–130.0020%7 Apr →
vertigo13–100.007%6 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0012%4 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0521%4 Apr →
overpass8–130.0014%4 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0213%4 Apr →
anubis13–60.018%3 Apr →
overpass13–10-0.0110%2 Apr →
ancient13–30.0714%2 Apr →
vertigo13–11-0.0310%2 Apr →
ancient9–130.0310%1 Apr →
nuke13–4-0.0017%1 Apr →
anubis13–70.1118%1 Apr →
mirage13–50.0319%31 Mar →
overpass13–40.0926%27 Mar →
overpass0–40.000%27 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0615%27 Mar →
ancient0–13-0.085%27 Mar →
overpass13–20.115%26 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0115%25 Mar →
ancient13–70.0523%23 Mar →
mirage13–90.0520%22 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0217%22 Mar →
inferno15–12-0.0020%21 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0120%20 Mar →
ancient13–70.0514%17 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0114%17 Mar →
overpass13–90.0117%11 Mar →
vertigo6–13-0.098%11 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.056%28 Feb →
mirage16–140.0223%26 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0110%26 Feb →
anubis13–160.0216%26 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.