Milfman

Milfman — CS2 Stats

SE76561198029428480[U:1:69162752]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,410Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,241Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+7Tracked matches · now 2,410
−1.0ppWin rate · 72.4% → 71.4%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,888 -1,231 6 Mar – 5 May · 22 days played
25,27628,119peak 28,1196 Mar5 May
28,558Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-03-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches11——
Win rate45%——
K/D0.83——
Headshot %55%——

Measured 24 Sep 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning70
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateTWLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.6
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning7.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time526ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 1 May →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 2 May →
328msFastest reaction time · 5–6 · ancient, 10 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3415–1944%0.02
ancientB137–654%0.02
infernoA116–555%0.04
nukeB115–645%0.03
mirageC104–640%0.01
cacheA106–460%0.05
anubisS64–267%0.03
office—21–150%0.03
overpass—20–20%0.04
vertigo—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

231,355Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
7,160Matches
43.4%Match win rate
56.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of tracked players
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
18,017MVPs
5,507Hours (in match)
8,908Bombs planted
1,929Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47111,997
AWP10,053
MP93,664
FAMAS2,963
UMP-452,919

Lifetime map wins

12,612dust2
12,577inferno
4,994vertigo
3,940nuke
1,792train
1,231cbble
324office
99assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,327Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
84.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis22754%1.1316.0
Inferno14960%1.1616.2
Mirage12942%1.0215.2
Ancient12558%1.1216.4
Vertigo11450%1.1115.9
Nuke5252%1.2116.2
Dust25155%1.1616.0
Overpass3259%1.1118.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
527msReaction time
51.6%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
11.10HE damage / grenade
3.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3826 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–120.0220%21 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0123%20 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0313%16 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0518%6 Oct →
dust213–70.0116%6 Oct →
anubis13–70.0624%10 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0117%10 Sept →
ancient5–60.0029%10 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0212%10 Sept →
cache13–20.1531%9 Sept →
inferno15–150.0619%9 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0224%9 Sept →
ancient13–30.0533%8 Sept →
dust211–130.0618%1 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0220%13 Jun →
dust213–100.0221%13 Jun →
cache13–110.0319%13 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0213%12 Jun →
inferno13–50.0711%12 Jun →
office13–30.0914%12 May →
dust25–130.0218%6 May →
dust23–13-0.0719%5 May →
dust213–8-0.0017%5 May →
ancient13–60.0316%5 May →
dust213–20.0615%4 May →
cache13–20.1221%3 May →
nuke13–110.0211%2 May →
dust213–10-0.0119%2 May →
cache13–80.0536%2 May →
cache13–90.0726%2 May →
dust27–130.0319%2 May →
cache3–130.067%2 May →
cache13–9-0.0126%1 May →
vertigo13–50.0713%1 May →
dust213–20.2016%1 May →
cache7–13-0.0312%30 Apr →
cache9–130.0917%30 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0214%26 Apr →
inferno13–50.0815%26 Apr →
ancient10–130.0212%26 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0017%22 Apr →
dust22–13-0.0426%22 Apr →
nuke13–100.0612%22 Apr →
inferno13–90.0226%22 Apr →
ancient6–130.0119%21 Apr →
dust213–40.1225%21 Apr →
dust213–50.1211%19 Apr →
dust213–30.0722%11 Apr →
ancient8–30.1217%10 Apr →
nuke11–130.0314%3 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0715%3 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0514%3 Apr →
nuke5–130.0716%30 Mar →
dust213–100.0410%30 Mar →
mirage13–110.0315%23 Mar →
dust28–130.0417%22 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.1119%22 Mar →
inferno12–160.099%20 Mar →
dust213–100.1822%20 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0126%20 Mar →
nuke9–130.0514%20 Mar →
overpass8–130.0415%19 Mar →
ancient11–130.024%19 Mar →
ancient13–110.0711%18 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0219%18 Mar →
nuke11–130.0215%18 Mar →
dust213–90.0615%18 Mar →
inferno13–60.0420%18 Mar →
dust25–13-0.058%18 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0213%17 Mar →
inferno9–130.0514%17 Mar →
overpass9–130.0410%17 Mar →
mirage13–40.0211%17 Mar →
nuke13–8-0.006%17 Mar →
dust26–130.0225%16 Mar →
nuke13–90.0115%15 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0320%15 Mar →
anubis8–130.1019%13 Mar →
ancient1–13-0.0824%13 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0010%13 Mar →
dust213–60.0911%13 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0113%12 Mar →
mirage13–70.1313%12 Mar →
ancient13–80.0623%12 Mar →
inferno13–80.1118%11 Mar →
dust213–70.0716%11 Mar →
nuke16–120.1017%11 Mar →
mirage9–130.0414%11 Mar →
ancient13–90.0612%9 Mar →
anubis13–100.045%8 Mar →
dust28–130.0510%8 Mar →
mirage10–130.0228%8 Mar →
dust21–13-0.0213%8 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0312%7 Mar →
dust26–13-0.1111%7 Mar →
inferno2–13-0.0415%7 Mar →
office10–13-0.038%7 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0413%7 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.018%6 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0611%6 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.