kawa

kawa — CS2 Stats

76561198029360985[U:1:69095257]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,625Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,476Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,661Purple band · top ~17.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,407 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,661 +3,013 30 Aug – 21 Oct · 12 days played
14,64818,846peak 18,84630 Aug21 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,407 +0 30 Aug – 4 Oct · 2 observations
1,4071,407peak 1,40730 Aug4 Oct
19,249Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,407Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
14Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,407
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,185 below peak (18,846)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,339 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,185), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate45.6%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy12.6%12.4%12.7%meets
Kill/death ratio1.031.031.050.02 short
Match win rate43.1%45.2%45.7%2.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkawaFACEITLevel 6 · 1,407 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,661 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,407csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning64
Utility16

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateLWLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · +0ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility1.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch0.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 59% on T to 44% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.4
Utility1.6
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.06
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time626ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy25.2%+5.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 7–0 · anubis, 10 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 7–1 · cache, 9 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · vertigo, 14 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 18% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1811–761%-0.01
anubisD173–1418%-0.00
dust2A159–660%0.01
infernoD124–833%-0.01
nukeC114–736%0.01
ancientD93–633%0.01
cacheD72–529%-0.02
trainS54–180%0.02
vertigo—21–150%-0.01
office—11–0100%0.07
shelter—11–0100%0.11
poseidon—10–10%-0.15
italy—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,136Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
6,949Matches
43.1%Match win rate
45.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
12.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
18,010MVPs
1,812Hours (in match)
5,182Bombs planted
1,051Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,548
AWP8,773
SG 5533,297
SSG 082,896
AUG2,749
FAMAS2,640

Lifetime map wins

9,537nuke
4,269dust2
3,844inferno
3,389vertigo
2,020train
1,935office
1,602cbble
641italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

131Matches
55%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
75.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1759%1.1016.5
Mirage1553%0.9813.6
Dust21346%0.9412.8
Nuke956%0.9113.2
Overpass580%1.0213.2
Anubis560%0.8914.6
Inferno560%0.7010.0
Cache2100%1.2422.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
636msReaction time
59.0%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.17Enemies flashed / flash
0.8%Flash assists
8.70HE damage / grenade
0.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1734 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–130.0427%21 Oct →
ancient13–90.0524%21 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0320%20 Oct →
nuke9–60.0435%20 Oct →
anubis7–130.0015%19 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0513%19 Oct →
dust213–70.0821%19 Oct →
mirage13–60.0124%19 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0511%19 Oct →
anubis13–50.0633%14 Oct →
vertigo9–60.0538%14 Oct →
mirage2–120.0215%14 Oct →
nuke7–130.0614%13 Oct →
inferno5–90.1011%13 Oct →
mirage13–110.0223%10 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0226%10 Oct →
dust213–6-0.068%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0213%10 Oct →
mirage13–110.0120%10 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0522%10 Oct →
dust213–0-0.0267%10 Oct →
ancient10–130.0124%10 Oct →
anubis3–130.0022%10 Oct →
inferno13–100.0128%10 Oct →
anubis7–00.1717%10 Oct →
office13–110.0730%9 Oct →
train13–2-0.0029%9 Oct →
anubis8–130.0119%9 Oct →
cache7–10.00100%9 Oct →
dust211–70.0826%9 Oct →
mirage13–40.1014%9 Oct →
shelter5–10.1129%9 Oct →
dust213–90.0617%8 Oct →
cache12–70.0232%8 Oct →
nuke12–120.0219%8 Oct →
train13–9-0.0128%7 Oct →
anubis11–130.0118%7 Oct →
dust23–130.0413%7 Oct →
mirage13–50.0320%7 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0329%7 Oct →
train13–30.0731%7 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0622%7 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0933%7 Oct →
dust25–13-0.1015%7 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.1523%6 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0121%6 Oct →
poseidon2–9-0.1550%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0119%6 Oct →
ancient3–130.0425%6 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0424%6 Oct →
inferno13–100.0221%6 Oct →
mirage13–100.0016%6 Oct →
dust213–90.1042%6 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0020%6 Oct →
nuke8–130.0134%6 Oct →
nuke13–80.0924%6 Oct →
anubis13–50.0723%6 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0627%6 Oct →
inferno7–130.0118%6 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0026%6 Oct →
mirage15–150.0530%5 Oct →
dust210–130.0432%5 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0421%4 Oct →
cache10–130.0410%4 Oct →
dust213–70.0626%4 Oct →
nuke13–110.0821%4 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0519%4 Oct →
cache9–130.0022%4 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0620%4 Oct →
inferno13–110.0421%4 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0315%4 Oct →
ancient13–40.019%4 Oct →
italy7–13-0.0424%3 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0633%3 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0424%3 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.078%3 Oct →
dust213–90.0223%3 Oct →
ancient13–30.0418%3 Oct →
anubis11–130.0017%3 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0416%3 Oct →
cache3–130.0037%3 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1725%3 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0422%3 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0128%3 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0425%3 Oct →
train12–120.0123%2 Oct →
mirage8–130.0018%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0319%2 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0230%2 Oct →
cache1–13-0.1410%2 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0818%2 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.088%2 Oct →
anubis3–110.0017%2 Oct →
train10–50.0216%2 Oct →
vertigo9–13-0.0821%2 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0014%2 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0724%2 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0316%2 Oct →
mirage11–130.0127%2 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0311%2 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.