naitte — CS2 Stats

PROODDIKBrazilRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198029203966[U:1:68938238]✓ No bans

2,400Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.6 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,646Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1911 of 15482 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,777 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning68

Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateWWWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression9.1

Utility7.1

Positioning6.8

Opening Duels5.2

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning6.8

Utility7.1

Mechanics6.6

Opening Duels5.2

Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time559ms+19ms

first ⅓ avg 540ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms

Headshot accuracy30.0%+2.2%

first ⅓ avg 27.9% → last ⅓ avg 30.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–3

13–2Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

W3Current streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 31nukeWeakest map · 11% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	31	22–9	71%	0.03
ancient	A	20	12–8	60%	0.02
mirage	B	15	7–8	47%	0.03
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	0.03
nuke	D	9	1–8	11%	-0.02
inferno	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.02
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
cache	—	3	3–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,283Matches

59%Win rate

1.30Avg K/D

93.2ADR

58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	437	58%	1.21	18.6
Ancient	366	62%	1.35	19.5
Anubis	343	61%	1.27	18.7
Mirage	173	48%	1.19	17.8
Nuke	167	58%	1.17	17.8
Vertigo	45	60%	1.18	17.3
Inferno	36	42%	1.02	14.7
Train	34	68%	1.31	19.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.1%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.4%Spray accuracy

79.5%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

552msReaction time

37.6%T opening success

64.1%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

12.4%Flash assists

16.86HE damage / grenade

11.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.6199% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–11	-0.03	22%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.06	33%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	22%	26 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	26%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	31%	26 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	18%	25 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	33%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	47%	20 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	16%	6 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.00	42%	6 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	38%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	22%	2 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.03	36%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	35%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.00	29%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.11	38%	30 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	25%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.02	25%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.03	36%	29 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.02	45%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.14	41%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.08	41%	28 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.06	33%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.09	28%	23 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	29%	23 Jun →
anubis	7–13	0.02	23%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.06	17%	22 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	33%	21 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	31%	21 Jun →
inferno	22–20	0.01	26%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.06	28%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.06	16%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.14	27%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.02	27%	18 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.07	30%	18 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.01	21%	15 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.03	25%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.12	30%	14 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.07	22%	12 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.07	33%	11 Jun →
anubis	15–19	0.01	25%	11 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	18%	11 Jun →
anubis	16–13	0.08	27%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.06	30%	8 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.03	24%	7 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.06	22%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.05	42%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.02	18%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.01	18%	3 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.05	23%	28 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	18%	23 May →
dust2	13–2	0.06	21%	23 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	28%	23 May →
dust2	10–6	0.04	39%	11 May →
ancient	13–7	0.05	31%	11 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	11%	11 May →
dust2	3–3	-0.08	0%	11 May →
ancient	13–10	0.08	28%	10 May →
overpass	2–13	-0.05	40%	10 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	29%	10 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	24%	10 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	12%	10 May →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	36%	9 May →
anubis	14–9	0.02	28%	9 May →
dust2	13–9	0.04	28%	9 May →
ancient	13–4	0.04	24%	8 May →
dust2	13–5	0.09	33%	8 May →
ancient	13–10	0.05	34%	7 May →
nuke	7–13	0.05	24%	2 May →
dust2	13–10	0.03	25%	2 May →
overpass	13–11	0.04	29%	2 May →
mirage	11–13	0.01	24%	30 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.03	32%	29 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	30%	29 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.02	27%	29 Apr →
anubis	9–13	0.02	21%	27 Apr →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	41%	27 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	24%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.03	29%	26 Apr →
anubis	13–11	0.04	32%	25 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.05	26%	24 Apr →
dust2	16–19	0.00	27%	24 Apr →
nuke	7–13	-0.00	24%	4 Apr →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	15%	4 Apr →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	19%	4 Apr →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	41%	3 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	32%	3 Apr →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	50%	3 Apr →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	25%	3 Apr →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	17%	3 Apr →
inferno	13–7	0.01	43%	3 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.00	26%	3 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.10	29%	3 Apr →
overpass	13–9	0.02	19%	2 Apr →
ancient	13–3	0.13	26%	2 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	25%	2 Apr →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	38%	2 Apr →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	22%	2 Apr →
overpass	3–13	-0.04	18%	1 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.14	27%	1 Apr →