LLegacies — CS2 Stats

76561198027098938[U:1:66833210]

3,093Tracked matches45%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,111Purple band · top ~12% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11268 of 23612 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 984 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLLegaciesFACEITLevel 5 · 984 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,111 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning44
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateWWWLLLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression4.5
Utility3.5
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.4
Utility3.5
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time567ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — mirage 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 68% over 19mirageWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1913668%-0.01
infernoB168850%-0.01
mirageC1661038%-0.03
dust2C146843%-0.02
nukeB147750%0.01
cacheA127558%-0.02
anubisC94544%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

125Matches
54%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
77.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22945%0.7812.9
Mirage2767%1.0313.3
Ancient1968%1.0516.0
Anubis1553%1.0716.7
Nuke1145%0.8213.4
Inferno1030%1.0016.0
Vertigo540%1.0517.0
Cache450%0.8214.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
564msReaction time
24.3%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
4.84HE damage / grenade
7.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3604 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.25% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0017%25 Aug
anubis13–60.0013%25 Aug
inferno13–100.0222%25 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0214%24 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0832%24 Aug
ancient14–160.0715%24 Aug
dust215–15-0.0619%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0324%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0629%23 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0421%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0216%23 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0131%23 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0623%23 Aug
nuke13–160.0414%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.0320%22 Aug
cache13–8-0.0122%22 Aug
nuke11–130.0425%22 Aug
dust26–13-0.0315%22 Aug
cache13–9-0.0310%22 Aug
dust24–11-0.0518%22 Aug
nuke16–120.0519%22 Aug
dust213–8-0.0315%21 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0111%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0928%20 Aug
inferno13–80.0716%20 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0410%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.149%19 Aug
cache8–13-0.0623%17 Aug
cache7–13-0.0323%17 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0814%16 Aug
ancient13–6-0.019%16 Aug
nuke13–30.0316%16 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0238%16 Aug
cache13–80.0832%16 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0114%15 Aug
anubis13–70.0520%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.0423%15 Aug
dust216–140.0217%15 Aug
ancient13–80.0324%14 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0416%10 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0216%10 Aug
inferno8–130.0317%9 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0034%9 Aug
inferno13–60.0220%9 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0714%9 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0118%9 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0114%9 Aug
cache10–130.0114%8 Aug
mirage13–30.0916%8 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0126%7 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0434%7 Aug
nuke13–50.0219%7 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0515%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0434%6 Aug
cache13–8-0.0110%6 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0410%5 Aug
mirage13–40.0222%5 Aug
dust22–00.000%5 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1017%5 Aug
nuke14–160.0417%5 Aug
inferno13–100.0626%4 Aug
nuke13–80.0519%3 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0531%3 Aug
anubis15–150.0219%3 Aug
ancient16–130.0026%2 Aug
mirage7–130.0323%2 Aug
inferno1–130.0333%2 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0322%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0224%2 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0224%2 Aug
anubis13–100.0424%31 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0132%29 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0439%29 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0219%29 Jul
mirage12–5-0.0014%26 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0213%26 Jul
cache12–4-0.0618%25 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0514%25 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0118%24 Jul
ancient16–140.0118%23 Jul
cache5–13-0.0618%22 Jul
ancient8–130.0118%22 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0514%21 Jul
mirage6–13-0.047%21 Jul
cache16–14-0.0019%21 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0733%19 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0313%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0113%18 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0710%18 Jul
ancient13–80.0230%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.0118%6 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0427%5 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0411%5 Jul
ancient13–60.0615%5 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0629%5 Jul
dust213–70.0620%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.0310%3 Jul
dust213–10-0.0121%3 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0019%3 Jul
anubis13–40.0410%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →